Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The effect of the absence of rumen ciliate protozoa on growing lambs fed on a roughage–concentrate diet

  • J. Margaret Eadie (a1) and J. C. Gill (a1)
Abstract

1. Lambs were removed form their dams at 2 d of age, and at 5 weeks of age eitht of one group were incoulated with a mixed rumen ciliate and seven in a second group were maintained ciliate-free throughout the 61 weeks of the experiment. Performance of the groups was compared when given a 2:1 roughage:concentrate diet as a set ration and with ad lib. roughage.

2. Mixed ciliate populations developed in all faunated lambs and average-sized populations were maintained. Large numbers of flagellate protozoa developed in the ciliate-free animals after flagellates had been introduced into the building with the ciliate-free animals after flagellates had been introduced into the building with the ciliate inoculum.

3. Higher numbers of rumen bacteria were found in the ciliate-free group.

4. Only between the 14th and 21st weeks was there a significant different between groups in weight gain and this was infavour of the faunated group. The only significant different in body measurements was greater girth in the ciliate-free lambs.

5. Only minor differences were found between the groups in calorimetric trials, digestibility and nitrogen balanes. There were no differences between groups in concentration of total protein N and soluble sugar in the rumen. The ammonis concentration was significantly higher in the faunated group.

6. The concentrations of total rumen volatile fatty acids (VFA) were higher in the faunated group. Differences, between groups, in proportions of VFA were attributed to the activity of the rumen bacteria rather than the ciliates per se.

7. No differences between groups were found in the concentrations of blood sugar and haemoglobin.

8. It was concluded that the changes due to the presence of rumen ciliates were not great enough to be reflected in animal performance under the conditions of this experiment.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The effect of the absence of rumen ciliate protozoa on growing lambs fed on a roughage–concentrate diet
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The effect of the absence of rumen ciliate protozoa on growing lambs fed on a roughage–concentrate diet
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The effect of the absence of rumen ciliate protozoa on growing lambs fed on a roughage–concentrate diet
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Abou Akkada, A. R. & El Shazly, K. (1964). Appl. Microbiol. 12, 384.
Abou Akkada, A. R. & El Shazly, K. (1965). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64, 251.
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1960). Methods of Analysis 9th ed.Washington: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.
Becker, E. R. (1932). Q. Rev. Biol. 7, 282.
Becker, E. R. & Everett, R. C. (1930). Am. J. Hyg. 11, 362.
Becker, E. R., Schulz, J. A. & Emmerson, M. A. (1930). Iowa St. J. Sci. 4, 215.
Boyne, A. W., Eadie, J. M. & Raitt, K. (1957). J. gen. Microbiol. 17, 414.
Brouwer, E. (1965). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 11, p. 441.
Chalmers, M. I., Cuthbertson, D. P. & Synge, R. L. M. (1954). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 44, 254.
Chalmers, M. I., Davidson, J., Eadie, J. M. & Gill, J. C. (1968). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 27, 29A.
Christiansen, W. C., Kawashima, R. & Burroughs, W. (1965). J. Anim. Sci. 24, 730.
Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A. & Smith, F. (1956). Analyt. Chem. 28, 350.
Eadie, J. M. (1962). J. gen. Microbiol. 29, 563.
Eadie, J. M. (1967). J. gen. Microbiol. 49, 175.
Eadie, J. M., Hyldgaard-Jensen, J., Mann, S. O., Reid, R. S. & Whitelaw, F. G. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 157.
Fell, B. F., Kay, M., Whitelaw, F. G. & Boyne, R. (1968). Res. vet. Sci. 9, 458.
Heilmeyer, L. (1943). Spectrophotometry in Medicine p. 70. London: Hilger.
Hobson, P. N., Mann, S. O. & Summers, R. (1966). J. gen Microbiol. 45, 5P.
Hugget, A. St. G. & Nixon, D. A. (1957). Lancet ii, p. 368.
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes p. 126. London: Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd.
Klopfenstein, T. J., Purser, D. B. & Tyznik, W. J. (1966). J. Anim. Sci. 25, 765.
Kurihara, Y., Eadie, J. M., Hobson, P. N. & Mann, S. O. (1968). J. gen. Microbiol. 51, 267.
Luther, R., Trenkle, A. & Burroughs, W. (1966). J. Anim. Sci. 25, 1116.
Pounden, W. D. & Hibbs, J. W. (1950). J. Dairy Sci. 33, 639.
Storry, J. E. & Millard, D. (1965). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 16, 417.
Wainman, F. W. & Blaxter, K. L. (1969). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 12, p. 429.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed