Skip to main content Accessibility help

Impact of a non-restrictive satiating diet on anthropometrics, satiety responsiveness and eating behaviour traits in obese men displaying a high or a low satiety phenotype

  • Hélène Arguin (a1), Angelo Tremblay (a1) (a2) (a3), John E. Blundell (a4), Jean-Pierre Després (a1) (a2), Denis Richard (a2), Benoît Lamarche (a3) and Vicky Drapeau (a2) (a3) (a5)...


The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a non-restrictive satiating diet in men displaying various degrees of satiety efficiency. In all, sixty-nine obese men aged 41·5 (sd 5·7) years were randomly assigned to a control (10–15, 55–60 and 30 % energy as protein, carbohydrate and lipid, respectively; n 34) or satiating (20–25, 45–50 and 30–35 % energy as protein, carbohydrate and lipid, respectively; n 35) diet for 16 weeks, and were classified as having a low (LSP) or high (HSP) satiety phenotype. Both diets were consumed ad libitum. Changes in body weight, BMI, percent fat mass, waist circumference, satiety responsiveness and eating behaviour traits were assessed following the intervention. Dropout rates were higher in the control diet (44·1 %) compared with the satiating diet (8·6 %). Decreases in body weight, BMI and waist circumference were significant in both groups, yet HSP individuals lost more body weight than LSP individuals (P=0·048). Decreases in % fat mass were greater in the satiating diet (LSP: −2·1 (sd 2·1) %; P<0·01 and HSP: −3·0 (sd 2·5) %; P<0·001) compared with the control diet (LSP: −1·1 (sd 2·5) % and HSP: −1·3 (sd 2·6) %) (P=0·034). Satiety responsiveness was markedly improved in the satiating diet, whereas no significant changes were observed in the control group. Changes in dietary restraint (+3·3 (sd 2·9) to +7·2 (sd 5·5)), flexible control (+0·9 (sd 1·4) to +2·3 (sd 2·7)), rigid control (+2·2 (sd 1·5) to +2·5 (sd 2·8)), disinhibition (−2·8 (sd 3·7) to −3·2 (sd 2·6)) and susceptibility to hunger (−2·7 (sd 4·1) to −4·6 (sd 3·9)) were similar between the diets. Compared with the control diet, the satiating diet favoured adherence, decreased % fat mass and improved satiety responsiveness in both HSP and LSP individuals.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Impact of a non-restrictive satiating diet on anthropometrics, satiety responsiveness and eating behaviour traits in obese men displaying a high or a low satiety phenotype
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Impact of a non-restrictive satiating diet on anthropometrics, satiety responsiveness and eating behaviour traits in obese men displaying a high or a low satiety phenotype
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Impact of a non-restrictive satiating diet on anthropometrics, satiety responsiveness and eating behaviour traits in obese men displaying a high or a low satiety phenotype
      Available formats


Corresponding author

* Corresponding author: V. Drapeau, fax +1 418 656 2441, email


Hide All
1. Hopkins, M & Blundell, JE (2016) Energy balance, body composition, sedentariness and appetite regulation: pathways to obesity. Clin Sci 130, 16151628.
2. Barkeling, B, King, NA, Näslund, E, et al. (2007) Characterization of obese individuals who claim to detect no relationship between their eating pattern and sensations of hunger or fullness. Int J Obes 31, 435439.
3. Drapeau, V, Hetherington, M & Tremblay, A (2011) Impact of eating and lifestyle behaviours on body weight. Beyond energy value. In Handbook of Behaviour, Diet and Nutrition Vol. Part 5, pp. 693–706 [VR Preedy, R Ross Watson and CR Martin, editors]. New York: Springer.
4. Drapeau, V, Blundell, J, Therrien, F, et al. (2005) Appetite sensations as a marker of overall intake. Br J Nutr 93, 273280.
5. Drapeau, V, King, N, Hetherington, M, et al. (2007) Appetite sensations and satiety quotient: predictors of energy intake and weight loss. Appetite 48, 159166.
6. Drapeau, V, Blundell, J, Gallant, AR, et al. (2013) Behavioural and metabolic characterisation of the low satiety phenotype. Appetite 70, 6772.
7. Langeveld, M & DeVries, JH (2015) The long-term effect of energy restricted diets for treating obesity: effect of diets for treating obesity. Obesity 23, 15291538.
8. Gilbert, J-A, Joanisse, DR, Chaput, J-P, et al. (2011) Milk supplementation facilitates appetite control in obese women during weight loss: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Nutr 105, 133143.
9. Rolls, BJ (2009) The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake. Physiol Behav 97, 609615.
10. Anderson, GH & Moore, SE (2004) Dietary proteins in the regulation of food intake and body weight in humans. J Nutr 134, 974S979S.
11. Halton, TL & Hu, FB (2004) The effects of high protein diets on thermogenesis, satiety and weight loss: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr 23, 373385.
12. Dahl, WJ & Stewart, ML (2015) Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Health Implications of Dietary Fiber. J Acad Nutr Diet 115, 18611870.
13. Parra, D, Ramel, A, Bandarra, N, et al. (2008) A diet rich in long chain omega-3 fatty acids modulates satiety in overweight and obese volunteers during weight loss. Appetite 51, 676680.
14. Gonzalez, JT, Green, BP, Brown, MA, et al. (2015) Calcium ingestion suppresses appetite and produces acute overcompensation of energy intake independent of protein in healthy adults. J Nutr 145, 476482.
15. Tremblay, A, Arguin, H & Panahi, S (2016) Capsaicinoids: a spicy solution to the management of obesity? Int J Obes 40, 11981204.
16. Health Canada (2007) Eating well with Canada’s food guide. (accessed March 2017).
17. Stunkard, AJ & Messick, S (1985) The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 29, 7183.
18. Hill, A & Blundell, J (1986) Macronutrients and satiety: the effects of a high-protein or high-carbohydrate meal on subjective motivation to eat and food preferences. Nutr Behav 3, 133144.
19. Arvaniti, K, Richard, D & Tremblay, A (2000) Reproducibility of energy and macronutrient intake and related substrate oxidation rates in a buffet-type meal. Br J Nutr 83, 489495.
20. Dalton, M, Hollingworth, S, Blundell, J, et al. (2015) Weak Satiety responsiveness is a reliable trait associated with hedonic risk factors for overeating among women. Nutrients 7, 74217436.
21. The Airlie (VA) Consensus Conference (1988) Part 1. Measurement descriptions and techniques. In Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual, pp. 39–80 [TG Lohman, AF Roche and R Martorell, editors]. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
22. Westenhoefer, J, Stunkard, AJ & Pudel, V (1999) Validation of the flexible and rigid control dimensions of dietary restraint. Int J Eat Disord 26, 5364.
23. Laessle, RG, Tuschl, RJ, Kotthaus, BC, et al. (1989) A comparison of the validity of three scales for the assessment of dietary restraint. J Abnorm Psychol 98, 504507.
24. Lluch, A (1995) Identification des conduites alimentaires par approches nutritionnelles et psychométriques: implications thérapeutiques et préventives dans l’obésité humaine (Identification of food intake behaviours by nutritional and psychometrics means: implications for prevention and treatment of human obesity). PhD Thesis, University of Nancy.
25. Foster-Powell, K, Holt, SHA & Brand-Miller, JC (2002) International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 556.
26. Poortvliet, PC, Bérubé-Parent, S, Drapeau, V, et al. (2007) Effects of a healthy meal course on spontaneous energy intake, satiety and palatability. Br J Nutr 97, 584.
27. Brown, JD, Buscemi, J, Milsom, V, et al. (2016) Effects on cardiovascular risk factors of weight losses limited to 5–10%. Transl Behav Med 6, 339346.
28. Villeneuve, N, Pelletier-Beaumont, E, Nazare, J-A, et al. (2014) Interrelationships between changes in anthropometric variables and computed tomography indices of abdominal fat distribution in response to a 1-year physical activity–healthy eating lifestyle modification program in abdominally obese men. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 39, 503511.
29. Despres, J-P, Lemieux, I, Bergeron, J, et al. (2008) Abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome: contribution to global cardiometabolic risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 28, 10391049.
30. Leidy, HJ, Carnell, NS, Mattes, RD, et al. (2007) Higher protein intake preserves lean mass and satiety with weight loss in pre-obese and obese women. Obesity 15, 421429.
31. Tang, M, Armstrong, CLH, Leidy, HJ, et al. (2013) Normal vs. high-protein weight loss diets in men: effects on body composition and indices of metabolic syndrome. Obesity (Silver Spring) 21, E204E210.
32. Wycherley, TP, Moran, LJ, Clifton, PM, et al. (2012) Effects of energy-restricted high-protein, low-fat compared with standard-protein, low-fat diets: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 96, 12811298.
33. Gilbert, J-A, Drapeau, V, Astrup, A, et al. (2009) Relationship between diet-induced changes in body fat and appetite sensations in women. Appetite 52, 809812.
34. Flood, JE & Rolls, BJ (2007) Soup preloads in a variety of forms reduce meal energy intake. Appetite 49, 626634.
35. Rolls, BJ, Roe, LS & Meengs, JS (2004) Salad and satiety: energy density and portion size of a first-course salad affect energy intake at lunch. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 15701576.
36. Williams, RA, Roe, LS & Rolls, BJ (2014) Assessment of satiety depends on the energy density and portion size of the test meal. Obesity (Silver Spring) 22, 318324.
37. Pérez-Escamilla, R, Obbagy, JE, Altman, JM, et al. (2012) Dietary energy density and body weight in adults and children: a systematic review. J Acad Nutr Diet 112, 671684.
38. Williams, RA, Roe, LS & Rolls, BJ (2013) Comparison of three methods to reduce energy density. Effects on daily energy intake. Appetite 66, 7583.
39. Arguin, H, Gagnon-Sweeney, M, Pigeon, É, et al. (2012) Functional food and satiety. Impact of a satiating context effect on appetite control of non-obese men. Appetite 58, 354363.
40. Clifton, PM, Keogh, JB & Noakes, M (2008) Long-term effects of a high-protein weight-loss diet. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 2329.
41. Yang, D, Liu, Z, Yang, H, et al. (2014) Acute effects of high-protein versus normal-protein isocaloric meals on satiety and ghrelin. Eur J Nutr 53, 493500.
42. Larsen, TM, Dalskov, S-M, van Baak, M, et al. (2010) Diets with high or low protein content and glycemic index for weight-loss maintenance. N Engl J Med 363, 21022113.
43. Mikkelsen, PB, Toubro, S & Astrup, A (2000) Effect of fat-reduced diets on 24-h energy expenditure: comparisons between animal protein, vegetable protein, and carbohydrate. Am J Clin Nutr 72, 11351141.
44. Martens, EAP & Westerterp-Plantenga, MS (2014) Protein diets, body weight loss and weight maintenance. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 17, 7579.
45. Veldhorst, M, Smeets, A, Soenen, S, et al. (2008) Protein-induced satiety: effects and mechanisms of different proteins. Physiol Behav 94, 300307.
46. Krog-Mikkelsen, I, Sloth, B, Dimitrov, D, et al. (2011) A low glycemic index diet does not affect postprandial energy metabolism but decreases postprandial insulinemia and increases fullness ratings in healthy women. J Nutr 141, 16791684.
47. Roberts, SB (2003) Glycemic index and satiety. Nutr Clin Care 6, 2026.
48. Carreiro, AL, Dhillon, J, Gordon, S, et al. (2016) The macronutrients, appetite, and energy intake. Annu Rev Nutr 36, 73103.
49. Ye, EQ, Chacko, SA, Chou, EL, et al. (2012) Greater whole-grain intake is associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and weight gain. J Nutr 142, 13041313.
50. Wanders, AJ, van den Borne, JJGC, de Graaf, C, et al. (2011) Effects of dietary fibre on subjective appetite, energy intake and body weight: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials: dietary fibres, appetite and body weight. Obes Rev 12, 724739.
51. Blundell, JE & Halford, JC (1994) Regulation of nutrient supply: the brain and appetite control. Proc Nutr Soc 53, 407418.
52. de Graaf, C, Blom, WAM, Smeets, PAM, et al. (2004) Biomarkers of satiation and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 79, 946961.
53. Golub, N, Geba, D, Mousa, SA, et al. (2011) Greasing the wheels of managing overweight and obesity with omega-3 fatty acids. Med Hypotheses 77, 11141120.
54. Chambers, L, McCrickerd, K & Yeomans, MR (2015) Optimising foods for satiety. Trends Food Sci Technol 41, 149160.
55. Bryant, EJ, King, NA & Blundell, JE (2007) Disinhibition: its effects on appetite and weight regulation: disinhibition’s effects on weight regulation. Obes Rev 9, 409419.
56. Ouwens, MA, van Strien, T & van der Staak, CPF (2003) Tendency toward overeating and restraint as predictors of food consumption. Appetite 40, 291298.
57. Carr, KA, Lin, H, Fletcher, KD, et al. (2014) Food reinforcement, dietary disinhibition and weight gain in nonobese adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 22, 254259.
58. Rogers, M, Lemstra, M, Bird, Y, et al. (2016) Weight-loss intervention adherence and factors promoting adherence: a meta-analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence 10, 15471559.
59. Johnston, BC, Kanters, S, Bandayrel, K, et al. (2014) Comparison of weight loss among named diet programs in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis. JAMA 312, 923.
60. Meule, A, Westenhöfer, J & Kübler, A (2011) Food cravings mediate the relationship between rigid, but not flexible control of eating behavior and dieting success. Appetite 57, 582584.
61. Atkinson, G & Batterham, AM (2015) True and false interindividual differences in the physiological response to an intervention. Exp Physiol 100, 577588.
62. Bayer, O, Krüger, H, von Kries, R, et al. (2011) Factors associated with tracking of BMI: a meta-regression analysis on BMI tracking. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19, 10691076.
63. Atkinson, G & Nevill, AM (1998) Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26, 217238.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed