Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation

  • Pascalle L. G. Weijzen (a1) (a2), Paul A. M. Smeets (a1) (a3) and Cees de Graaf (a1)
Abstract

Sensory-specific satiation (SSS) drives food selection and contributes to meal termination. We hypothesised that smaller sips would increase SSS due to increased oro-sensory exposure, irrespective of energy content. The objective was to determine the effects of sip size and energy content on ad libitum intake of orangeade and subjective SSS for orangeade. Orangeade intake and ratings of wanting and liking were measured before and after ad libitum orangeade consumption in a 2 × 2 cross-over design (n 53). Conditions differed in energy content (no-energy v. regular-energy orangeade) and in sip size (large, 20 g/sip v. small, 5 g/sip). The mean intake of both orangeades was lower when consumed with small sips than when consumed with large sips (regular-energy, 352 v. 493 g; no-energy, 338 v. 405 g; both P < 0·001). When consumed with large sips, the mean intake of no-energy orangeade was lower than that of regular-energy orangeade (P = 0·02). When consumed with small sips, subjective SSS (based on the desire to drink) was higher for no-energy orangeade than for regular-energy orangeade (P = 0·01), while mean intake was comparable. We concluded that smaller sip size, i.e. increased oro-sensory exposure per unit of consumption, can lower intake of sweet drinks. Only with low oro-sensory exposure (large sip size) was intake higher for an energy-containing sweet drink than for a no-energy sweet drink. This suggests that intake of sweet drinks is stimulated by (metabolic) reward value and inhibited by sensory satiation. This underpins the importance of SSS for meal termination.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Dr Pascalle Weijzen, fax +31 570 695 918, email Pascalle.weijzen@frieslandcampina.com
References
Hide All
1Mela, DJ (2006) Eating for pleasure or just wanting to eat? Reconsidering sensory hedonic responses as a driver of obesity. Appetite 47, 1017.
2Wansink, B (2004) Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. Annu Rev Nutr 24, 455479.
3Blundell, JE, Green, S & Burley, V (1994) Carbohydrates and human appetite. Am J Clin Nutr 59, 728S734S.
4Rolls, BJ, Rolls, ET, Rowe, EA, et al. (1981) Sensory specific satiety in man. Physiol Behav 27, 137142.
5Sørensen, LB, Møller, P, Flint, A, et al. (2003) Effect of sensory perception of foods on appetite and food intake: a review of studies on humans. Int J Obes 27, 11521166.
6Weijzen, PLG, Zandstra, EH, Alfieri, C, et al. (2008) Effects of complexity and intensity on sensory specific satiety and food acceptance after repeated consumption. Food Qual Prefer 19, 349359.
7Zijlstra, N, Mars, M, De Wijk, RA, et al. (2008) The effect of viscosity on ad libitum food intake. Int J Obes 32, 676683.
8Haber, GB, Heaton, KW, Murphy, D, et al. (1977) Depletion and disruption of dietary fibre. Lancet ii, 679682.
9Hulshof, T, De Graaf, G & Weststrate, JA (1993) The effects of preloads varying in physical state and fat content on satiety and energy intake. Appetite 21, 273286.
10Mattes, RD (1996) Dietary compensation by humans for supplemental energy provided as ethanol or carbohydrates in fluids. Physiol Behav 59, 179187.
11DiMeglio, DP & Mattes, RD (2000) Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 794800.
12Mattes, RD (2006) Beverages and positive energy balance: the menace is the medium. Int J Obes 30, S60S65.
13Spiegel, TA & Jordan, HA (1978) Effects of simultaneous oral-intragastric ingestion on meal patterns and satiety in humans. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92, 133141.
14Spiegel, T (2000) Rate of intake, bites, and chews – the interpretation of lean–obese differences. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24, 229237.
15German, RZ, Crompton, AW, Owerkowicz, T, et al. (2004) Volume and rate of milk delivery as determinants of swallowing in an infant model animal (Sus scrofia). Dysphagia 19, 147154.
16De Graaf, C, Schreurs, A & Blauw, YH (1993) Short-term effects of different amounts of sweet and nonsweet carbohydrates on satiety and energy intake. Physiol Behav 54, 833843.
17Johnson, J & Vickers, Z (1993) Effects of flavour and macronutrient composition of food servings on liking, hunger, and subsequent intake. Appetite 21, 2539.
18Rolls, BJ, Hetherington, M & Burley, VJ (1988) Sensory stimulation and energy density in the development of satiety. Physiol Behav 44, 727733.
19Rolls, BJ, Laster, LJ & Summerfelt, A (1989) Hunger and food intake following consumption of low-calorie foods. Appetite 13, 115127.
20Miller, DL, Hammer, VA, Peters, JC, et al. (1996) Influence of the fat content of a food on sensory-specific satiety. FASEB J 10, A824.
21Miller, DL, Bell, EA, Pelkman, CL, et al. (2000) Effects of dietary fat, nutrition labels, and repeated consumption on sensory-specific satiety. Physiol Behav 71, 153158.
22Van Strien, T (2002) Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionaire Manual. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company Ltd.
23Hetherington, MM & Boyland, E (2007) Short-term effects of sugar gum on snack intake and appetite. Appetite 48, 397401.
24Lavin, JH, French, SJ, Ruxton, CHS, et al. (2002) An investigation of the role of oro-sensory stimulation in sugar satiety. Int J Obes 26, 384388.
25Mattes, RD & Rothacker, D (2001) Beverage viscosity is inversely related to postprandial hunger in humans. Physiol Behav 74, 551557.
26Tsuchiya, A, Almiron-Roig, E, Lluch, A, et al. (2006) Higher satiety ratings following yoghurt consumption relative to fruit drink or dairy fruit drink. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 550557.
27Harper, A, James, A, Flint, A, et al. (2007) Increased satiety after intake of a chocolate milk drink compared with a carbonated beverage, but no difference in subsequent ad libitum lunch intake. Br J Nutr 97, 579583.
28Mattes, RD (2005) Soup and satiety. Physiol Behav 83, 739747.
29Oka, K, Sakuarae, A, Fuijse, T, et al. (2003) Food texture differences affect energy metabolism in rats. J Dent Res 82, 491494.
30Tournier, A & Louis-Sylvestre, J (1991) Effect of the physical state of a food on subsequent intake in human subjects. Appetite 16, 1724.
31De Castro, JM (1993) The effects of the spontaneous ingestion of particular foods or beverages on the meal pattern and overall nutrient intake of humans. Physiol Behav 53, 11331144.
32Raben, A, Vasilaras, TH, Møller, AC, et al. (2002) Sucrose compared with artificial sweeteners: different effects on ad libitum food intake and body weight after 10 wk of supplementation in overweight subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 721729.
33Frank, GKW, Oberndorfer, TA, Simmons, AN, et al. (2008) Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweeteners. Neuroimage 39, 15591569.
34De Araujo, IE, Oliveira-Maia, AJ, Sotnikova, TD, et al. (2008) Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling. Neuron 57, 930941.
35Appleton, KM & Blundell, JE (2007) Habitual high and low consumers of artificially-sweetened beverages: effects of sweet taste and energy on short-term appetite. Physiol Behav 92, 479486.
36Davidson, TL & Swithers, SE (2004) A Pavlovian approach to the problem of obesity. Int J Obes 28, 933935.
37Swithers, SE & Davidson, TL (2005) Obesity: outwitting the wisdom of the body? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 5, 159162.
38Swithers, SE & Davidson, TL (2008) A role for sweet taste: calorie predictive relations in energy regulation by rats. Behav Neurosci 122, 161173.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed