Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 33
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ashwar, Bilal Ahmad Gani, Adil Shah, Asima Wani, Idrees Ahmed and Masoodi, Farooq Ahmad 2016. Preparation, health benefits and applications of resistant starch-a review. Starch - Stärke, Vol. 68, Issue. 3-4, p. 287.


    Nishimura, Naomichi Tanabe, Hiroki and Yamamoto, Tatsuro 2016. Isomaltodextrin, a highly branched α-glucan, increases rat colonic H2production as well as indigestible dextrin. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, Vol. 80, Issue. 3, p. 554.


    Ordiz, M. Isabel May, Thaddaeus D. Mihindukulasuriya, Kathie Martin, John Crowley, Jan Tarr, Phillip I. Ryan, Kelsey Mortimer, Elissa Gopalsamy, Geetha Maleta, Ken Mitreva, Makedonka Young, Graeme and Manary, Mark J. 2015. The effect of dietary resistant starch type 2 on the microbiota and markers of gut inflammation in rural Malawi children. Microbiome, Vol. 3, Issue. 1,


    Morales-Medina, Rocío del Mar Muñío, María Guadix, Emilia M. and Guadix, Antonio 2014. Production of resistant starch by enzymatic debranching in legume flours. Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 101, p. 1176.


    Gélinas, Pierre 2013. Preventing constipation: a review of the laxative potential of food ingredients. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue. 3, p. 445.


    Klosterbuer, Abby S. Hullar, Meredith A. J. Li, Fei Traylor, Elizabeth Lampe, Johanna W. Thomas, William and Slavin, Joanne L. 2013. Gastrointestinal effects of resistant starch, soluble maize fibre and pullulan in healthy adults. British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 110, Issue. 06, p. 1068.


    Bird, Anthony R. Lopez-Rubio, Amparo Shrestha, Ashok K. and Gidley, Michael J. 2009. Modern Biopolymer Science.


    Grabitske, Hollie A. and Slavin, Joanne L. 2009. Gastrointestinal Effects of Low-Digestible Carbohydrates. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, Vol. 49, Issue. 4, p. 327.


    Maki, Kevin C. Sanders, Lisa M. Reeves, Matthew S. Kaden, Valerie N. Rains, Tia M. and Cartwright, Yolanda 2009. Beneficial effects of resistant starch on laxation in healthy adults. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Vol. 60, Issue. sup4, p. 296.


    Birkett, A.M. and Brown, I.L. 2008. Technology of Functional Cereal Products.


    Birkett, A.M. and Brown, I.L. 2007. Novel Food Ingredients for Weight Control.


    Elia, M and Cummings, J H 2007. Physiological aspects of energy metabolism and gastrointestinal effects of carbohydrates. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 61, p. S40.


    Lunn, J. and Buttriss, J. L. 2007. Carbohydrates and dietary fibre. Nutrition Bulletin, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 21.


    Rahman, Sadequr Bird, Anthony Regina, Ahmed Li, Zhongyi Philippe Ral, Jean McMaugh, Steve Topping, David and Morell, Matthew 2007. Resistant starch in cereals: Exploiting genetic engineering and genetic variation. Journal of Cereal Science, Vol. 46, Issue. 3, p. 251.


    Storey, D Lee, A Bornet, F and Brouns, F 2007. Gastrointestinal responses following acute and medium term intake of retrograded resistant maltodextrins, classified as type 3 resistant starch. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 61, Issue. 11, p. 1262.


    Björck, Inger 2006. Carbohydrates in Food, Second Edition.


    Nugent, A. P. 2005. Health properties of resistant starch. Nutrition Bulletin, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 27.


    Champ, M. 2004. Starch in Food.


    Cummings, John H. Edmond, Laurie M. and Magee, Elizabeth A. 2004. Dietary carbohydrates and health: do we still need the fibre concept?. Clinical Nutrition Supplements, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 5.


    Heacock, Patricia M. Hertzler, Steven R. and Wolf, Bryan 2004. The glycemic, insulinemic, and breath hydrogen responses in humans to a food starch esterified by 1-octenyl succinic anhydride. Nutrition Research, Vol. 24, Issue. 8, p. 581.


    ×

The effect of resistant starch on colon function in humans

  • J. Tomlin (a1) and N. W. Read (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/BJN19900058
  • Published online: 01 March 2007
Abstract

Starch that is resistant to human amylases forms during the cooking and subsequent cooling of some foods, and may therefore be a substrate for the bacterial flora of the colon. It is thus possible that resistant starch (RS) will affect colon function in a similar manner to non-starch polysaccharides. To test this theory, a group of eight volunteers took two diet supplements for 1 week each in a random order with a 1 week separation. One supplement comprised mainly 350 g Cornflakes/d and the other 380 g Rice Krispies/d, providing 10.33 and 0.86 g RS/.d respectively. The amounts of amylase-digestible starch, non-starch polysaccharides, total carbohydrate, energy, protein and fat were balanced between the two periods by giving small amounts of Casilan, wheat bran, butter and boiled sweets. The volunteers made faecal collections during day 3 to day 7 of each period. Whole-gut transit time was calculated using the continuous method. Stool consistency and ease of defaecation were assessed by the volunteers. All episodes of flatulence noticed were recorded in a diary, along with food intake. Serial breath hydrogen measurements were made at 15 min intervals for 8 h on day 1 of each supplement. Questionnaires regarding colon function were completed at the end of each dietary period. There were no significant differences in the stool mass, frequency or consistency, ease of defaecations, transit time or flatulence experienced during the two supplements (P > 0.05). Significantly more H2 (area under curve) was produced while eating Cornflakes than Rice Krispies (P < 0.05). The difference of 9.47 g RS/d between the two diets was over three times the calculated normal daily RS intake of 2.76 g/d. As the only significant difference observed was in the breath H2 excretion on day 1, we suggest that either RS is rapidly and completely fermented to end-products including H2 gas, which is subsequently excreted via the lungs and has little influence on colon function, or that bacterial adaptation removed any observable effect on faecal mass and transit time by day 3.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The effect of resistant starch on colon function in humans
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The effect of resistant starch on colon function in humans
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The effect of resistant starch on colon function in humans
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. H. Cummings , D. J. A. Jenkins & H. S. Wiggins (1976). Measurement of the mean transit time of dietary residue through the human gut. Gut 17, 210218.

G. J. Davies , M. Crowder , B. Reid & J. W. T. Dickerson (1986). Bowel function measurements of individuals with different eating patterns. Gut 27, 164169.

M. L. Dreher , C. J. Dreher & J. W. Berry (1984). Starch digestibility of foods: a nutritional perspective. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 20, 4771.

H. N. Englyst , V. Anderson & J. H. Cummings (1983). Starch and NSP in some cereal foods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 14341440.

H. N. Englyst & J. H. Cummings (1984). Simplified method for the measurement of total NSP by GLC of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst 109, 937942.

H. N. Englyst & G. T. MacFarlane (1986). Breakdown of resistant and readily digestible starch by human gut bacteria. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37, 699706.

B. Flourie , C. Florent , J. Jouany -P., P. Thivend , F. Etanchaud & J. C. Rambaud (1986). Colonic metabolism of wheat starch in healthy humans. Gastroenterology 90, 111119.

A. M. Stephen & J. H. Cummings (1980). Microbial contribution to human faecal mass. Journal of Medical Microbiology 13, 4556.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: