Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry

  • Hideaki Kumahara (a1) (a2), Yves Schutz (a1), Makoto Ayabe (a2), Mayumi Yoshioka (a3), Yutaka Yoshitake (a4), Munehiro Shindo (a5), Kojiro Ishii (a2) and Hiroaki Tanaka (a5)...
Abstract

Assessing the total energy expenditure (TEE) and the levels of physical activity in free-living conditions with non-invasive techniques remains a challenge. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of a new uniaxial accelerometer for assessing TEE and physical-activity-related energy expenditure (PAEE) over a 24 h period in a respiratory chamber, and to establish activity levels based on the accelerometry ranges corresponding to the operationally defined metabolic equivalent (MET) categories. In study 1, measurement of the 24 h energy expenditure of seventy-nine Japanese subjects (40 (SD 12) years old) was performed in a large respiratory chamber. During the measurements, the subjects wore a uniaxial accelerometer (Lifecorder; Suzuken Co. Ltd, Nagoya, Japan) on their belt. Two moderate walking exercises of 30 min each were performed on a horizontal treadmill. In study 2, ten male subjects walked at six different speeds and ran at three different speeds on a treadmill for 4 min, with the same accelerometer. O2 consumption was measured during the last minute of each stage and was expressed in MET. The measured TEE was 8447 (SD 1337) kJ/d. The accelerometer significantly underestimated TEE and PAEE (91·9 (SD 5·4) and 92·7 (SD 17·8) % chamber value respectively); however, there was a significant correlation between the two values (r 0·928 and 0·564 respectively; P<0·001). There was a strong correlation between the activity levels and the measured MET while walking (r2 0·93; P<0·001). Although TEE and PAEE were systematically underestimated during the 24 h period, the accelerometer assessed energy expenditure well during both the exercise period and the non-structured activities. Individual calibration factors may help to improve the accuracy of TEE estimation, but the average calibration factor for the group is probably sufficient for epidemiological research. This method is also important for assessing the diurnal profile of physical activity.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Dr Yves Schutz, fax +41 21 692 55 95, email Yves.Schutz@iphysiol.unil.ch
References
Hide All
Bassett DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL & King GA (2000) Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32, S471S480.
Bland JM & Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307310.
Bouten CV, Verboeket-Van de Venne WP, Westerterp KR, Verduin M & Janssen JD (1996) Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water. J Appl Physiol 81, 10191026.
Bouten CV, Westerterp KR, Verduin M & Janssen JD (1994) Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26, 15161523.
Bray MS, Wong WW, Morrow JR Jr, Butte NF & Pivarnik JM (1994) Caltrac versus calorimeter determination of 24-h energy expenditure in female children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26, 15241530.
Brozek J, Grande F, Anderson JT & Keys A (1963) Densitometric analysis of body composition: Review of some quantitative assumptions. Ann NY Acad Sci 110, 113140.
Chen KY & Sun M (1997) Improving energy expenditure estimation by using a triaxial accelerometer. J Appl Physiol 83, 21122122.
Du Bois BS & Du Bois EF (1916) Clinical calorimetry: a formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Med 17, 863871.
Ebina N, Shimada M, Tanaka H et al. (2002) Comparative study of total energy expenditure in Japanese men using doubly labeled water method against activity record, heart rate monitoring, and accelerometer methods. Jpn J Phys Fitness Sports Med 51, 151164 (In Japanese: English abstract).
Esparza J, Fox C, Harper IT et al. (2000) Daily energy expenditure in Mexican and USA Pima indians: low physical activity as a possible cause of obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 5559.
Fehling PC, Smith DL, Warner SE & Dalsky GP (1999) Comparison of accelerometers with oxygen consumption in older adults during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31, 171175.
Fields DA, Goran MI & McCrory MA (2002) Body-composition assessment via air-displacement plethysmography in adults and children: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 75, 453467.
Fleisch A (1951) Le métabolisme basal standard et sa détermination au moyen du "Metabocalculator" (Basal standard metabolic rate and its determination by means of the "Metabocalculator"). Helv Med Acta 18, 2344.
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization/United Nations University (1985) Energy and Protein Requirements. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Technical Report Series no. 724 Geneva: WHO.
Freedson PS, Melanson E & Sirard J (1998) Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30, 777781.
Fujimoto S, Watanabe T, Sakamoto A, Yukawa K & Morimoto K (1968) Studies on the physical surface area of Japanese. 18. Calculation formulas in three stages over all ages. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 23, 443450(In Japanese: English abstract).
Harris JA & Benedict FG (1919) A Biometric Study of Basal Metabolism in Man. Publication no. 279. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute Washington.
Haymes EM & Byrnes WC (1993) Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25, 13651369.
Health Promotion and Nutrition Division, Health Service Bureau, Ministry of Health and Welfare (1996) Recommended Dietary Allowances for the Japanese, 5th revision 2024. Tokyo: Dai-ichi shuppan Co. Ltd.
Jequier E & Schutz Y (1983) Long-term measurements of energy expenditure in humans using a respiration chamber. Am JClin Nutr 38, 989998.
Levine JA, Baukol PA & Westerterp KR (2001) Validation of the Tracmor triaxial accelerometer system for walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33, 15931597.
Levine JA, Eberhardt NL & Jensen MD (1999) Role of nonexercise activity thermogenesis in resistance to fat gain in humans. Science 283, 212214.
Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Martinez JA, Hu FB, Gibney MJ & Kearney J (1999) Physical inactivity, sedentary lifestyle and obesity in the European Union. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 23, 11921201.
Meijer EP, Goris AH, Wouters L & Westerterp KR (2001) Physical inactivity as a determinant of the physical activity level in the elderly. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25, 935939.
Meijer GA, Westerterp KR, Koper H ten Hoor F (1989) Assessment of energy expenditure by recording heart rate and body acceleration. Med Sci Sports Exerc 21, 343347.
Nagamine S & Suzuki S (1964) Anthropometry and body composition of Japanese young men and women. Hum Biol 36, 815.
Nichols JF, Morgan CG, Sarkin JA, Sallis JF & Calfas KJ (1999) Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31, 908912.
Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN et al. (1995) Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. J Am Med Assoc 273, 402407.
Ravussin E & Bogardus C (2000) Energy balance and weight regulation: genetics versus environment. Br J Nutr 83, S17S20.
Robertson JD & Reid DD (1952) Standards for the basal metabolism of normal people in Britain. Lancet 1, 940943.
Schutz Y, Ravussin E, Diethelm R & Jequier E (1982) Spontaneous physical activity measured by radar in obese and control subject studied in a respiration chamber. Int J Obes 6, 2328.
Schutz Y, Weinsier RL & Hunter GR (2001) Assessment of free-living physical activity in humans: an overview of currently available and proposed new measures. Obes Res 9, 368379.
Suzuki I, Kawakami N & Shimizu H (1997) Accuracy of calorie counter method to assess daily energy expenditure and physical activities in athletes and nonathletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 37, 131136.
Terrier P, Aminian K & Schutz Y (2001) Can accelerometry accurately predict the energy cost of uphill/downhill walking? Ergonomics 44, 4862.
Weinsier RL, Hunter GR, Heini AF, Goran MI & Sell SM (1998) The etiology of obesity: relative contribution of metabolic factors, diet, and physical activity. Am J Med 105, 145150.
Yamada S & Baba Y (1990) Validity of daily energy expenditure estimated by calorie counter combined with accelerometer. J Univ Occup Environ Health 12, 7782 (In Japanese: English abstract).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 519 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 778 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.