Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-wzgmz Total loading time: 0.492 Render date: 2022-07-01T04:47:03.732Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Too Much of a Bad Thing? Civilian Victimization and Bargaining in Civil War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2013

Abstract

While studies of the motives for intentional insurgent violence against civilians are now common, relatively little academic research has focused on the impact of victimization on conflict processes or war outcomes. This article addresses this gap in the literature. Specifically, the authors examine the influence of civilian victimization on bargaining between the regime and insurgents during a civil war. A curvilinear relationship between the level of civilian victimization used by insurgents and the likelihood that conflict ends in negotiated settlement is posited. The probability of settlement is highest for groups that engage in a moderate level of civilian killing but declines at particularly high levels. A competing risk analysis using monthly conflict data on African civil wars between 1989 and 2010 supports this argument.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

School of Politics and Global Studies, Arizona State University; Department of Political Science, University at Buffalo, SUNY (emails: reed.wood@asu.edu; kathman@buffalo.edu). The authors, whose names are listed in reverse alphabetical order, wish to thank Christian Davenport, Emily Ritter, Jacqueline Demerrit, Scott Wolford, Christopher Sullivan, Jeff Carter, Susan Allen, Megan Shannon, and Jon Winburn for their helpful suggestions. They are also grateful for the comments provided by the three anonymous reviewers. On-line appendix and dataset available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S000712341300001X Data set.

References

Abrahms, Max. 2006. Why Terrorism Does Not Work. International Security 31:4278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahms, Max. 2012. The Political Effectiveness of Terrorism Revisited. Comparative Political Studies 45:336393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1970. On Violence. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Scott, Clinton, Joshua, Meirowitz, Adam Ramsay, Kristopher. 2008. Design, Inference, and the Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. American Political Science Review 102:269273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azam, Jean-Paul. 2006. On Thugs and Heroes: Why Warlords Victimize Their Own Civilians. Economics of Governance 7:5357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azam, Jean-Paul Hoeffler, Anke. 2002. Violence against Civilians in Civil Wars: Looting or Terror? Journal of Peace Research 39:461485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balcells, Laia. 2011. Continuation of Politics by Two Means: Direct and Indirect Violence in Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55:397422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch-Lindsay, Dylan Enterline, Andrew. 2002. Killing Time: The World Politics of Civil War Duration. International Studies Quarterly 4:615642.Google Scholar
Balch-Lindsay, Dylan, Enterline, Andrew Joyce, Kyle. 2008. Third Party Intervention and the Civil War Process. Journal of Peace Research 45:345363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bapat, Navin. 2005. Insurgency and the Opening of the Peace Process. Journal of Peace Research 42:699717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, Kyle McQuinn, Brian. 2009. Rebel Groups as Predatory Organizations: The Political Effects of the 2004 Tsunami in Indonesia and Sri Lanka. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53:624645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Patrick, Mason, T. David, Gurses, Mehmet, Petrovsky, Nicolai Radin, Dagmar. 2008. When and How the Fighting Stops: Explaining the Duration and Outcome of Civil Wars. Defense and Peace Economics 19:415434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, David. 2006. Veto Players and Civil War Duration. American Journal of Political Science 50:875892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, David, Gleditsch, Kristian Salehyan, Idean. 2009. It Takes Two: A Dyadic Approach to Civil War Duration and Outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53:570597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, Alexander. 2007. Draining the Sea by Filling the Graves: Investigating the Effectiveness of Indiscriminate Violence as a Counterinsurgency Strategy. Civil Wars 9:420442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, Alexander. 2008. Targeting Civilians in War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eck, Kristine. 2012. In Data We Trust? A Comparison of UCDP, GED and ACLED Conflict Events Datasets. Cooperation and Conflict 47:121141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, Kristine Hultman, Lisa. 2007. One-sided Violence against Civilians in Civil War: Insights from New Fatality Data. Journal of Peace Research 44:233246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49:379414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filson, Darren Werner, Suzanne. 2002. A Bargaining Model of War and Peace: Anticipating the Onset, Duration, and Outcome of War. American Journal of Political Science 46:819837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Jason Gray, Robert. 1999. A Proportional Hazard Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94:496509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, Elisabeth, Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Lujala, Paivi Ketil Rød, Jan. 2005. Conflict Diamonds: A New Dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science 22:257272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta Strand, Håvard. 2002. Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39:615637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Margaret. 1990. The Mozambican National Resistance Movement (RENAMO): A Study of the Destruction of an African Country. Africa 60:3968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, Thomas. 1983. Revolution and Counterrevolution: Mozambique's War of Independence, 1964–1974. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Danny. 2004. The Civilian Target in Sierra Leone and Liberia: Political Power, Military Strategy, and Humanitarian Intervention. African Affairs 103:211226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, Stephen. 1970. Viet Cong Repression and Its Implications for the Future. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Hovil, Lucy Werker, Erik. 2005. Portrait of a Failed Rebellion: An Account of Rational, Sub-optimal Violence in Western Uganda. Rationality and Society 17:534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultman, Lisa. 2007. Battle Losses and Rebel Violence: Raising the Cost of Fighting. Terrorism and Political Violence 19:205222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultman, Lisa. 2009. The Power to Hurt in Civil War: The Strategic Aim of RENAMO Violence. Journal of Southern African Studies 35:821834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2006. Handling and Manhandling Civilians in Civil War. American Political Science Review 100:429447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Mary. 1999. New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocher, Mathew, Pepinsky, Thomas Kalyvas, Stathis. 2011. Aerial Bombing and Counterinsurgency in the Vietnam War. American Journal of Political Science 55:201218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreutz, Joakim. 2010. How and When Armed Conflicts End: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 47:243250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydd, Andrew Walter, Barbara. 2006. The Strategies of Terrorism. International Security 31:4980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David. 2002. Rational Extremism: Understanding Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century. Dialogue IO Spring:1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leites, Nathan Wolf, Charles. 1970. Rebellion and Authority: An Analytic Essay on Insurgent Conflicts. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Lischer, Sarah. 2005. Dangerous Sanctuaries: Refugee Camps, Civil Wars and the Dilemma of Humanitarian Aid. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lujala, Päivi. 2009. Deadly Combat over Natural Resources: Gems, Petroleum, Drugs, and the Severity of Armed Civil Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53:5071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyall, Jason. 2009. Does Indiscriminate Violence Inref Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from Chechnya. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53:331362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty, Jaggers, Keith. 2011. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010. Available from http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm. Last accessed 22 February 2013.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham. 1943. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review 50:370396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, T. David. 1996. Insurgency, Counterinsurgency, and the Rational Peasant. Public Choice 86:6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, T. David. 2009. International Relations Theory and How Civil Wars End. International Interactions 35:341351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, T. David Fett, Patrick J.. 1996. How Civil Wars End: A Rational Choice Approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40:556568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metelitis, Claire. 2010. Inside Insurgency: On the Front Lines with the FACR, SPLA and PKK. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Moghadam, Assaf. 2006. Suicide Terrorism, Occupation, and the Globalization of Martyrdom: A Critique of Dying to Win . Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29:707729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pape, Robert. 1998. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Pavignani, Enrico, Colombo, Alessandro. 2001. Providing Health Services in Countries Disrupted by Civil Wars: A Comparative Analysis of Mozambique and Angola. Department of Emergency and Humanitarian Action, World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1999. In the Shadow of Power. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 2006. War as a Commitment Problem. International Organization 60:169203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Robert. 2012. Persistent Fighting and Shifting Power. American Journal of Political Science 56:620637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, Kristopher. 2008. Settling It on the Field: Battlefield Events and War Termination. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52:850879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick. 2002. Third Party Intervention and the Duration of Interstate Conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46:5573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Todd Enders, Walter. 2008. Economic Consequences of Terrorism in Developed and Developing Countries: An Overview. Pp. 1747 in Terrorism and Economic Development, edited by Philip Keefer and Norman Loayza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, Bremer, Stuart Stuckey, John. 1972. Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965. Pp. 1948 in Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by Bruce Russett. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Press.Google Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav. 2003. The Power to Hurt: Costly Conflict with Completely Informed State. American Political Science Review 97:123133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepanova, Ekaterina. 2009. Trends in Armed Conflicts: One-sided Violence against Civilians. In SIPRI Yearbook 2009: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, edited by Bates Gill. Available at http://www.sipri.org/yearbook/2009/ Google Scholar
Sundberg, Ralph, Lindgren, Mathilda, Padskocimait, Ausra. 2010. UCDP GED Codebook version 1.0-2011. Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University. Available at http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/datasets/ucdp_ged/ Google Scholar
Vinci, Anthony. 2005. The Strategic Use of Fear by the Lord's Resistance Army. Small Wars and Insurgencies 16(3):360381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Harrison. 2000. Bargaining and War. American Journal of Political Science 44:469484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara. 2002. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Jeremy. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Reed M. 2010. Rebel Capability and Strategic Violence against Civilians. Journal of Peace Research 47:601614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wucherpfennig, Julian, Metternich, Nils, Cederman, Lars-Erik Gleditsch, Kristian. 2012. Ethnicity, the State, and the Duration of Civil War. World Politics 64:79115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Wood supplementary material

Supplementary table

Download Wood supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 105 KB
43
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Too Much of a Bad Thing? Civilian Victimization and Bargaining in Civil War
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Too Much of a Bad Thing? Civilian Victimization and Bargaining in Civil War
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Too Much of a Bad Thing? Civilian Victimization and Bargaining in Civil War
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *