Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Authoritarian Institutions and Regime Survival: Transitions to Democracy and Subsequent Autocracy


This article examines how authoritarian parties and legislatures affect regime survival. While authoritarian legislatures increase the stability of dictators, political parties – even when devised to quell internal threats – can destabilize dictators. The main argument is that authoritarian parties influence the distribution of power in a subsequent new democracy by helping to protect the interests of authoritarian elites. These institutions thus increase the likelihood of democratization. Using a dataset of authoritarian regimes in 108 countries from 1946 to 2002 and accounting for simultaneity, the analysis models transitions to democracy and to a subsequent authoritarian regime. Results indicate that authoritarian legislatures are associated with a lower probability of transition to a subsequent dictatorship. Authoritarian parties, however, are associated with a higher likelihood of democratization.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Carles Boix , Democracy and Redistribution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)

Benjamin Smith . ‘Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party Rule’, World Politics, 57 (2005), 421451

Jennifer Gandhi and Adam Przeworski , ‘Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats’, Comparative Political Studies, 40 (2007), 12791301

Jason Brownlee , Authoritarianism in the Age of Democratization (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007)

Jennifer Gandhi , Political Institutions under Dictatorship (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008)

Beatrice Magaloni , ‘Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule’, Comparative Political Studies, 41 (2008), 715741

Allan Meltzer and Scott Richard , ‘A Rational Theory of the Size of Government’, Journal of Political Economy, 89 (1981), 914927

John Aldrich , Why Parties? (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)

Ora John Reuter and Jennifer Gandhi, ‘Economic Performance and Elite Defection from Hegemonic Parties’, British Journal of Political Science, 41 (2011), 83110

Samuel P. Huntington , ‘How Countries Democratize’, Political Research Quarterly, 106 (1991–1992), 579616

Terry Lynn Karl, ‘Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, 23 (1990), 121

Josep Colomer , ‘Transitions by Agreement: Modeling the Spanish Way’, American Political Science Review, 85 (1991), 12831302

Robert H Dix, ‘The Breakdown of Authoritarian Regimes’, Western Political Quarterly, 35 (1982), 554573

Ronald Wintrobe , The Political Economy of Dictatorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)

Michael Bratton and Nicolas van de Walle, ‘Patrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa’, World Politics, 46 (1994), 453489

Mark Peceny, Caroline Beer and Shannon Sanchez-Terry, ‘Dictatorial Peace?’ American Political Science Review, 96 (2002), 1526

Dan Reiter and Allan Stam , ‘Identifying the Culprit: Democracy, Dictatorship, and Dispute Initiation’, American Political Science Review, 97 (2003), 333337

Barbara Geddes , Paradigms and Sand Castles (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003)

Joseph Wright , ‘Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Impact Economic Growth and Investment’, American Journal of Political Science, 52 (2008), 322343

Frances Hagopian , ‘Democracy by Undemocratic Means? Elites, Political Pacts, and Regime Transition in Contemporary Brazil’, Comparative Political Studies, 23 (1990), 147170

Harry Kantor , ‘The Development of Accion Democratica de Venezuela’, Journal of Inter-American Studies, 1 (1959), 237255

Aurel Croissant , ‘Riding the Tiger: Civilian Control and the Military in Democratizing Korea’, Armed Forces & Society, 30 (2004), 357381

Daniel King , ‘The Thai Parliamentary Elections of 1992’, Asian Survey, 32 (1992), 11091123

Michael Mezey , ‘The 1971 Coup in Thailand: Understanding Why the Legislature Fails’, Asian Survey 13 (1973), 306317

Robert Zimmerman , ‘Student Revolution in Thailand: The End of the Thai Bureaucratic Polity?’ Asian Survey, 14 (1974), 509529

Hein Goemans, Kristian Skrede Gleditsch and Giacomo Chiozza, ‘Introducing Archigos: A Data Set of Political Leaders’, Journal of Peace Research, 46 (2009), 269283

Nathaniel Beck , Jonathan Katz and Richard Tuck , ‘Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable’, American Journal of Political Science, 42 (1998), 12601288

David Carter and Curt Signorino , ‘Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data’, Political Analysis, 18 (2010), 271292

Carles Boix and Susan Stokes , ‘Endogenous Democratization’, World Politics, 55 (2003), 517549

David Pion-Berlin, ‘Between Confrontation and Accommodation: Military and Government Policy in Democratic Argentina’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 23 (1991), 543571

Michael Schatzberg , ‘Beyond Mobutu: Kabila and the Congo’, Journal of Democracy, 8 (1997), 7084

James D. Fearon and David Laitin , ‘Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War’, American Political Science Review, 97 (2003), 7590

Angus Maddison , The World Economy: Historical Statistics (Paris: OECD, 2003)

Harvey Starr and Christina Lindborg , ‘Democratic Dominoes Revisited: The Hazards of Governmental Transitions, 1974–1996’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47 (2003), 490519

Daniel Brinks and Michael Coppedge , ‘Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbour Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy’, Comparative Political Studies, 39 (2660), 463489

John Londregan and Keith Poole , ‘Poverty, the Coup Trap, and the Seizure of Executive Power’, World Politics, 42 (1990), 151183

Mark Gasiorowski , ‘Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis’, American Political Science Review, 89 (1995), 882897

Beatric Magaloni , Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)

Tamir Moustafa , The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007)

Jessica Weeks , ‘Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve’, International Organization, 62 (2008), 3564

Hanne Fjelde , ‘Generals, Dictators, and Kings: Authoritarian Regimes and Civil Conflict, 1973–2004’, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 27 (2010), 195218

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Appendix

Wright Supplementary Appendix
Wright Supplementary Appendix

 Word (560 KB)
560 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 29
Total number of PDF views: 386 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 971 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.