Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Contested Sovereignty: Mapping Referendums on Sovereignty over Time and Space

  • Fernando Mendez and Micha Germann
Abstract

The recent proliferation of referendums on sovereignty matters has fuelled growing scholarly interest. However, comparative research is hindered by the weaknesses of current compilations, which tend to suffer from conceptual vagueness, varied coding decisions, incomplete coverage and ad hoc categorizations. Based on an improved conceptualization and theory-driven typology, this article presents a new dataset of 602 sovereignty referendums from 1776–2012, more than double the number in existing lists. In an exploratory analysis, it uncovers eight distinctive clusters of sovereignty referendums and identifies patterns of activity over time and space as well as outcomes produced.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau, University of Zurich (email: fernando.mendez@zda.uzh.ch); Centre for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich (email: micha.germann@icr.gess.ethz.ch). Earlier versions of this article were presented at the 2013 ‘Colloque sur la pratique référendaire et l’idéal démocratique européen’ in Clemont-Ferrand, the 2014 ECPR general conference in Glasgow and the 2015 PSA in Sheffield. Many thanks for all constructive comments received. We would especially like to thank Nicolas Aubert, Andreas Auer, Corsin Bisaz, Matt Qvortrup, Mario Mendez, Beat Müller, Uwe Serdült and Jonathan Wheatley for their input as well as the reviewers and the editor for their helpful suggestions. The research presented in this article was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant no. 10001A_135127. The dataset, codebook and replication codes are available from https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS. Updates will be made available on the project website at http://www.contestedsovereignty.com.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Auer, Andreas, Malinverni, Giorgio, and Hottelier, Michel. 2006. Droit constitutionnel suisse [Swiss Constitutional Law]. Bern: Stämpfli.
Beigbeder, Yves. 1994. International Monitoring of Plebiscites, Referenda and National Elections: Self-Determination and Transition to Democracy. Boston, MA: M. Nijhoff.
Beran, Harry. 1984. A Liberal Theory of Secession. Political Studies 32 (1):2131.
Birch, Anthony H. 1984. Another Liberal Theory of Secession. Political Studies 32 (4):596602.
Bogdanor, Vernon. 1981. Referendums and Separatism II. In The Referendum Device, edited by Austin Ranney, 143158. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Brady, Henry E., and Kaplan, Cynthia S.. 1994. Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. In Referendums Around the World, edited by David Butler and Austin Ranney, 174217. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Buchanan, Allen E. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butler, David, and Ranney, Austin, eds. 1978. Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Butler, David, and Ranney, Austin. 1994a. Practice. In Referendums Around the World, edited by David Butler and Austin Ranney, 110. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Butler, David, and Ranney, Austin, eds. 1994b. Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Centre for Research on Direct Democracy. 2011. Direct Democracy Database. Available from http://www.c2d.ch/, accessed 27 May 2014.
Chiorazzi, Michael G., and Most, Marguerite, eds. 2005. Prestatehood Legal Materials: A Fifty-State Research Guide, Including New York City and the District of Columbia. New York: Haworth Information Press.
Choudhry, Sujit, and Howse, Robert. 2000. Constitutional Theory and the Quebec Secession Reference. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 13 (2):143169.
Clarke, Harold D., Kornberg, Allan, and Stewart, Marianne C.. 2004. Referendum Voting as Political Choice: The Case of Quebec. British Journal of Political Science 34 (2):345355.
Correlates of War Project. 2011. State System Membership List, v2011. Available from http://correlatesofwar.org, accessed 25 May 2015.
Dahl, Robert. A. 1990. After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dardanelli, Paolo. 2005. Democratic Deficit or the Europeanisation of Secession? Explaining the Devolution Referendums in Scotland. Political Studies 53 (2):320342.
Denver, David. 2002. Voting in the 1997 Scottish and Welsh Devolution Referendums: Information, Interests and Opinions. European Journal of Political Research 41 (6):827843.
Farley, Lawrence T. 1986. Plebiscites and Sovereignty: The Crisis of Political Illegitimacy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Fauchille, Paul. 1925. Traité de droit international public. Tome I, deuxième partie: Paix [Treatise of International Public Law. Volume I, Second Part: Peace]. Paris: Rousseau and Cie.
Freudenthal, Felix. 1891. Die Volksabstimmung bei Gebietsabtretungen und Eroberungen [The Referendum in the Context of Cessions and Annexations]. Erlangen: Junge and Sohn.
Gawenda, Jerzy. A.B. 1946. Le plébiscite en droit international: Problème d’ordre juridique et politique [The Plebiscite in International Law: Judicial and Political Problems]. Fribourg: St-Paul.
Giroud, J. 1920. Le plébiscite international: Etude historique et critique de droit des gens [The International Plebiscite: Historical Study and Critique of International Law]. Le Puy: Peyriller, Rouchon and Gamon.
Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Goodhart, Philip. 1971. Referendum. London: Tom Stacey.
Goodhart, Philip. 1981. Referendums and Separatism I. In The Referendum Device, edited by Austin Ranney, 138142. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Haas, Ernst B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
He, Baogang. 2002. Referenda as a Solution to the National-Identity/Boundary Question: An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature. Alternatives 27 (1):6797.
Heraclides, Alexis. 1997. Ethnicity, Secessionist Conflict and the International Society: Towards Normative Paradigm Shift. Nations and Nationalism 3 (4):493520.
Hewitt, Christoher, and Cheetham, Tom. 2000. Encyclopedia of Modern Separatist Movements. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Hobolt, Sara B. 2009. Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hug, Simon. 2002. Voices of Europe: Citizens, Referendums and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hughes, James. 2001. Chechnya: The Causes of a Protracted Post-Soviet Conflict. Civil Wars 4 (4):1148.
Keohane, Robert O. 2003. Political Authority After Intervention: Gradations in Sovereignty. In Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas, edited by J. L. Holzgrefe and Robert O. Keohane, 275298. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Krasner, Stephen D. 2004. Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing States. International Security 29 (2):85120.
Krasner, Stephen D. 2005. The Case for Shared Sovereignty. Journal of Democracy 16 (1):6983.
Kunz, Josef L. 1961. Plebiszit [Plebiscite]. In Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts [Dictionary of International Law] edited by Karl Strupp and Hans-JürgenSchlochauer, 770774. Berlin: De Gruyter & Co.
Laponce, Jean. A. 2001. National Self-Determination and Referendums: The Case for Territorial Revisionism. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 7 (2):3356.
Laponce, Jean. A. 2004. Turning Votes into Territories: Boundary Referendums in Theory and Practice. Political Geography 23 (2):169183.
Laponce, Jean. A. 2010. Le référendum de souveraineté: Comparaisons, critiques et commentaires [The Sovereignty Referendum: Comparisons, Criticisms and Comments]. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Laponce, Jean. A. 2012. Language and Sovereignty Referendums: The Convergence Effect. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 18 (1):113128.
LeDuc, Lawrence. 2003. The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Peterborough and Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press.
Lee, Sung, and Ginty, Roger Mac. 2012. Context and Postconflict Referendums. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 18 (1):4364.
Loizides, Neophytos. 2014. Negotiated Settlements and Peace Referendums. European Journal of Political Research 53 (2):234249.
Loughlin, Martin, and Walker, Neil, eds. 2007. The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Mac Ginty, Roger. 2003. Constitutional Referendums and Ethnonational Conflict: The Case of Northern Ireland. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 9 (2):122.
Mattern, Johannes. 1920. The Employment of the Plebiscite in the Determination of Sovereignty. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins Press.
McCormick, John. 2004. The State of Utah. In The Uniting States, edited by Benjamin. F. Shearer, 11851214. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Mendez, Fernando, Mendez, Mario, and Triga, Vicky. 2014. Referendums and the European Union: A Comparative Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Minahan, James. 2002. Encyclopedia of the Stateless Nations: Ethnic and National Groups Around the World. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Minorities at Risk Project. 2009. Minorities at Risk Dataset. Available from http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/, accessed 27 May 2014.
Morel, Laurence. 2007. The Rise of ‘Politically Obligatory’ Referendums: The 2005 French Referendum in Comparative Perspecti. West European Politics 30 (5):10411067.
Muñoz, Jordi, and Guinjoan, Marc. 2013. Accounting for Internal Variation in Nationalist Mobilization: Unofficial Referendums for Independence in Catalonia (2009–11). Nations and Nationalism 19 (1):4467.
Nadeau, Richard, Martin, Pierre, and Blais, André. 1999. Attitude Towards Risk-Taking and Individual Choice in the Quebec Referendum on Sovereignty. British Journal of Political Science 29 (3):523539.
Oklopcic, Zoran. 2012. Independence Referendums and Democratic Theory in Quebec and Montenegro. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 18 (1):2242.
Oppermann, Kai. 2013. The Politics of Discretionary Government Commitments to European Integration Referendums. Journal of European Public Policy 20 (5):684701.
Pammett, Jon. H., and LeDuc, Lawrence.. 2001. Sovereignty, Leadership and Voting in the Quebec Referendums. Electoral Studies 20 (2):265280.
Peters, Anne. 1995. Das Gebietsreferendum im Völkerrecht: Seine Bedeutung im Licht der Staatenpraxis nach 1989 [The Territorial Referendum in International Law: Its Significance in Light of State Practice after 1989]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Philpott, Daniel. 1995. Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History. Journal of International Affairs 48 (2):353368.
Qvortrup, Matt. 2012. The History of Ethno-National Referendums 1791–2011. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 18 (1):129150.
Qvortrup, Matt. 2014. Referendums and Ethnic Conflict. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Radan, Peter. 2012. Secessionist Referenda in International and Domestic Law. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 18 (1):821.
Roba, William. 2004. The State of Iowa. In The Uniting States, edited by Benjamin. F. Shearer, 411433. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Rouard de Card, Edgar. 1890. Etudes de droit international [Studies in International Law]. Paris: A. Durand et Pedone-Lauriel.
Rourke, John. T., Hiskes, Richard. P., and Zirakzadeh, Cyrus. E.. 1992. Direct Democracy and International Politics: Deciding International Issues Through Referendums. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan. 1989. The ‘Requirement’ of Plebiscite in Territorial Rapprocheme. Houston Journal of International Law 12:2354.
Sarkees, Meredith R., and Wayman, Frank W.. 2010. Resort to War: A Data Guide to Inter-State, Extra-State, Intra-State, and Non-State Wars, 1816–2007. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Scelle, Georges. 1934. Précis de droit des gens: Principes et systématique. Deuxième partie: droit constitutionnel international [Synopsis of International Law: Principles and Systematic. Second Part: International Constitutional Law]. Paris: Recueil Sirey.
Sen, Ilker, G. 2015. Sovereignty Referendums in International and Constitutional Law. Berlin: Springer.
Shearer, Benjamin, F., ed. 2004. The Uniting States: The Story of Statehood for the Fifty United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Smith, Gordon. 1976. The Functional Properties of the Referendum. European Journal of Political Research 4 (1):123.
Solière, Eugène. 1901. Le plébiscite dans l’annexion: Etude historique et critique de droit des gens [The Annexation Plebiscite: Historical Study and Critique of International Law]. Paris: L. Boyer.
Suchmaschine fuer direkte Demokratie [Direct Democracy Search Engine]. 2014. Datenbank und Suchmaschine fuer direkte Demokratie [Database and Search Engine for Direct Democracy]. Available from http://www.sudd.ch/, accessed 27 May 2014.
Sussman, Gary. 2006. When the Demos Shapes the Polis: The Use of Referendums in Settling Sovereignty Issues. Available from http://www.iandrinstitute.org/New%20IRI%20Website%20Info/I&R%20Research%20and%20History/I&R%20Studies/Sussman%20-%20When%20the%20Demos%20Shapes%20the%20Polis%20IRI.pdf, 27 August 2014.
Thompson, Robert. J. 1989. Referendums and Ethnoterritorial Movements: The Policy Consequences and Political Ramifications. In Ethnoterritorial Politics, Policy, and the Western World, edited by Joseph. R. Rudolph and Robert. J. Thompson, 181220. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Tierney, Stephen. 2007. ‘We the Peoples’: Constituent Power and Constitutionalism in Plurinational States. In The Paradox of Constitutionalism, edited by Martin Loughlin and Neil Walker, 229246. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Tierney, Stephen. 2009. Constitutional Referendums: A Theoretical Enquiry. Modern Law Review 72 (3):360383.
Tierney, Stephen. 2013. Legal Issues Surrounding the Referendum on Independence for Scotland. European Constitutional Law Review 9 (3):359390.
Walker, Mark C. 2003. The Strategic Use of Referendums: Power, Legitimacy, and Democracy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wambaugh, Sarah. 1920. A Monograph on Plebiscites: With a Collection of Official Documents. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wambaugh, Sarah. 1933. Plebiscites Since the World War: With a Collection of Official Documents. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment.
Wheatley, Jonathan. 2012. The Disruptive Potential of Direct Democracy in Deeply Divided Societies. In Direct Democracy and Minorities, edited by Wilfried Marxer, 6473. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Wood, John. R. 1981. Secession: A Comparative Analytical Framework. Canadian Journal of Political Science 14 (1):107134.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Mendez and Germann Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed