Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Technology Competition and International Co-operation: Friends or Foes?

  • Sung Eun Kim and Johannes Urpelainen
Abstract

Is technology competition between commercial rivals an impediment to international co-operation? Or could it instead help states collaborate? Our game-theoretic model suggests that technology competition impedes international co-operation when states hold ‘techno-nationalist’ preferences but have starkly asymmetric abilities to capture new markets. States that expect to lose refuse to co-operate, so treaty formation fails. However, technology competition may also facilitate co-operation. While states invest in new technologies out of self-interest, doing so also reduces consumer prices for other states. Comparative case studies of environmental co-operation demonstrate the model's utility. For example, European co-operation on climate policy was easier to achieve because forerunner countries, such as Denmark and Germany, implemented industrial policies that enhanced the competitiveness of their renewable energy industries. This technology competition reduced the cost of renewable energy for other European countries, and thus lowered the economic costs of their emissions reductions.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Department of Political Science, Columbia University (email: ju2178@columbia.edu). We thank Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, the anonymous reviewers, Christopher Marcoux, Michaël Aklin and Tom Hale for useful comments on previous drafts. Data replication sets are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123412000762.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Aidt, Toke, Greiner, Sandra. 2002. Sharing the Climate Policy Burden in the EU. Discussion Paper 176. Hamburg: Insitute of International Economics.
Arp, Henning A. 1993. Technical Regulation and Politics: The Interplay between Economic Interests and Environmental Policy Goals in EC Car Emission Legislation. In European Integration and Environmental Policy, edited by J. D. Liefferink, Philip Lowe, and A. P. J. Mol, 150172. London: Belhaven Press.
Benedick, Richard E. 1998. Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brander, James A. Spencer, Barbara J.. 1985. Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry. Journal of International Economics 18 (1–2):83100.
Brown Weiss, Edith Jacobson, Harold Karan. 1998. Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance With International Environmental Accords. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Busch, Marc L. 1999. Trade Warriors: States, Firm, and Strategic-Trade Policy in High-Technology Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chayes, Abram Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Clapp, Jennifer. 2003. Transnational Corporate Interests and Global Environmental Governance: Negotiating Rules for Agricultural Biotechnology and Chemicals. Environmental Politics 12 (4):123.
Dasgupta, Susmita, Laplante, Benoit, Wang, Hua Wheeler, David. 2002. Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1):147168.
Davenport, Deborah Saunders. 2006. Global Environmental Negotiations and US Interests. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Desombre, Elizabeth R. 1995. Baptists and Bootleggers for the Environment: The Origins of United States Unilateral Sanctions. Journal of Environment and Development 4 (1):5375.
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M. Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3):379406.
EIA. 2005. Policies to Promote Non-Hydro Renewable Energy in the United States and Selected Countries. Energy Information Administration.
European Commission. 1995. Europeans and the Environment. Brussels: Survey for Eurobarometer 43.1.
Falkner, Robert. 2005. The Business of Ozone Layer Protection: Corporate Power in Regime Evolution. In The Business of Global Environmental Governance, edited by David L. Levy, Peter J. Newell, 105134 Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fearon, James D. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52:269305.
Fritsch, Stefan. 2011. Technology and Global Affairs. International Studies Perspectives 12:2745.
Furman, Jeffrey L., Porter, Michael E. Stern, Scott. 2002. The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy 31 (6):899933.
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization 42 (3):485507.
Hadjilambrinos, Constantine. 2000. Understanding Technology Choice in Electricity Industries: A Comparative Study of France and Denmark. Energy Policy 28 (15):11111126.
Haigh, Nigel. 1992. Manual of Environmental Policy: The EC and Britain. London: Longman Publishing.
Hatch, Michael T. 2007. The Politics of Climate Change in Germany: Domestic Sources of Environmental Foreign Policy. In Europe and Global Climate Change: Politics, Foreign Policy and Regional Cooperation, edited by Paul G. Harris, 4162. Cheltenhan and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Heymann, Matthias. 1998. Signs of Hubris: The Shaping of Wind Technology Styles in Germany, Denmark, and the United States, 1940–1990. Technology and Culture 39 (4):641670.
Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 30 (2):167214.
Jordan, Andrew. 1998. The Ozone Endgame: The Implementation of the Montreal Protocol in the United Kingdom. Environmental Politics 7 (4):2352.
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics 43 (3):336366.
Krugman, Paul R. 1984. Import Protection and Export Promotion: International Competition in the Presence of Oligopoly and Economies of Scale. In Monopolistic Competition in International Trade, edited by Henryk Kierzkowski, 180193. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kydd, Andrew. 2000. Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation. International Organization 54 (2):325357.
Laird, Frank N. Stefes, Christoph. 2009. The Diverging Paths of German and United States Policies for Renewable Energy: Sources of Difference. Energy Policy 37 (7):26192629.
Levi, Michael A., Economy, Elizabeth C., O'Neil, Shannon K. Segal, Adam. 2010. Energy Innovation: Driving Technology Competition and Cooperation Among the U.S., China, India, and Brazil. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Lewis, Joanna I. Wiser, Ryan H.. 2007. Fostering a Renewable Energy Technology Industry: An International Comparison of Wind Industry Policy Support Mechanisms. Energy Policy 35 (3):18441857.
Lipp, Judith. 2007. Lessons for Effective Renewable Electricity Policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 35 (11):54815495.
Litfin, Karen T. 1994. Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Maxwell, James H. Weiner, Sanford L.. 1993. Green Consciousness or Dollar Diplomacy?: The British Response to the Threat of Ozone Depletion. International Environmental Affairs 5 (1):1941.
Mendonça, Miguel. 2007. Feed-In Tariffs: Accelerating the Deployment of Renewable Energy. London: Earthscan.
Mitchell, Ronald B. 1994. Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance. International Organization 48 (3):425458.
Ogburn, William Fielding. 1949. Technology and International Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Department of Economics and Statistics. 1983. Foreign Trade by Commodities: Volume 1.
Ostry, Sylvia Nelson, Richard R.. 1995. Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism: Conflict and Cooperation. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Oye, Kenneth A. Maxwell, James H.. 1994. Self-Interest and Environmental Management. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (4):593624.
Parson, Edward A. 2003. Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ringius, Lasse. 1999. Differentiation, Leaders, and Fairness: Negotiating Climate Commitments in the European Community. International Negotiation 4 (2):133166.
Rowlands, Ian H. 1995. The Politics of Global Atmospheric Change. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Ruggie, John G. 1975. International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends. International Organization 29 (3):557583.
Sandholtz, Wayne. 1992. High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Cooperation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Schafer, Kristin S. 2002. Ratifying Global Toxics Treaties: The United States Must Provide Leadership. SAIS Review 22 (1):167176.
Skolnikoff, Eugene B. 1993. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sprinz, Detlef Vaahtoranta, Tapani. 1994. The Interest-Based Explanation of International Environmental Policy. International Organization 48 (1):77105.
Stern, David I. 2004. The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development 32 (8):14191439.
Szarka, Joseph. 2007. Why Is There No Wind Rush in France? European Environment 17 (5):321333.
Tucker, Jonathan B. 1991. Partners and Rivals: A Model of International Collaboration in Advanced Technology. International Organization 45 (1):83120.
Tyson, Laura D'Andrea. 1992. Who's Bashing Whom? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Urpelainen, Johannes. 2010. Enforcing International Environmental Cooperation: Technological Standards Can Help. Review of International Organizations 5 (4):475496.
Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Von Storch, Hans, Costa-Cabral, Mariza, Hagner, Charlotte, Feser, Frauke, Pacyna, Jòzef, Pacyna, Elisabeth Kolb, Steffen. 2003. Four Decades of Gasoline Lead Emissions and Control Policies in Europe: A Retrospective Assessment. Science of the Total Environment 311 (1–3):151176.
Wallace, David. 1995. Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Strategies in Europe, the US and Japan. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Watanabe, Chihiro, Wakabayashi, Kouji Miyazawa, Toshinori. 2000. Industrial Dynamism and the Creation of a `Virtuous Cycle’ Between R&D, Market Growth and Price Reduction: The Case of Photovoltaic Power Generation (PV) Development in Japan. Technovation 20 (6):299312.
Weiss, Charles. 2005. Science, Technology and International Relations. Technology in Society 27 (3):295313.
Wurzel, Rüdiger J.W. 2002. Environmental Policy-Making in Britain, Germany and the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Kim and Urpelainen supplementary data
Data files

 Unknown (2 KB)
2 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed