Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Pattie, C. J. Johnston, R. J. Schipper, Mariken and Potts, Laura 2015. Are Regions Important in British Elections? Valence Politics and Local Economic Contexts at the 2010 General Election. Regional Studies, Vol. 49, Issue. 9, p. 1561.

    Shi, Ying 2015. Cross-cutting Messages and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Same-Sex Marriage Amendment. Political Communication, p. 1.

    Auger, Giselle A. 2013. Fostering democracy through social media: Evaluating diametrically opposed nonprofit advocacy organizations’ use of Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. Public Relations Review, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 369.

    Pattie, Charles and Johnston, Ron 2013. Personal mobilisation, civic norms and political participation. Geoforum, Vol. 45, p. 178.

    Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger and Lup, Oana 2013. Seeking the Soul of Democracy: A Review of Recent Research into Citizens' Political Talk Culture. Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 513.

    Swigger, Nathaniel 2013. The Online Citizen: Is Social Media Changing Citizens’ Beliefs About Democratic Values?. Political Behavior, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 589.

    HOPMANN, DAVID NICOLAS 2012. The consequences of political disagreement in interpersonal communication: New insights from a comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 265.

    Nir, Lilach 2012. Cross-National Differences in Political Discussion: Can Political Systems Narrow Deliberation Gaps?. Journal of Communication, Vol. 62, Issue. 3, p. 553.

    Nir, Lilach 2011. Disagreement and Opposition in Social Networks: Does Disagreement Discourage Turnout?. Political Studies, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 674.

    Hobson, Kersty 2009. On a Governmentality Analytics of the ‘Deliberative Turn’: Material Conditions, Rationalities and the Deliberating Subject. Space and Polity, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 175.

    Pattie, C. J. and Johnston, R. J. 2009. Conversation, Disagreement and Political Participation. Political Behavior, Vol. 31, Issue. 2, p. 261.


It's Good To Talk: Talk, Disagreement and Tolerance

  • C. J. PATTIE (a1) and R. J. JOHNSTON (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 October 2008

Open political discussion between citizens is a cornerstone of democratic theory and contextual accounts of political behaviour. It provides both a means through which individuals can discover what their peers think and a forum within which they can rationalize, explain and perhaps modify their own opinions. Much previous research has focused on the potential of political conversation as a means of influencing others and of converting holders of minority views to the opinions of the majority. However, theoretical accounts of political conversation also stress its potential impact on more systemic attitudes towards democracy, including the development of tolerance for divergent views and lifestyles. The article provides an evaluation of these potential effects in the context of recent British politics.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *