Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation

  • Adam J. Berinsky
Abstract

This article explores belief in political rumors surrounding the health care reforms enacted by Congress in 2010. Refuting rumors with statements from unlikely sources can, under certain circumstances, increase the willingness of citizens to reject rumors regardless of their own political predilections. Such source credibility effects, while well known in the political persuasion literature, have not been applied to the study of rumor. Though source credibility appears to be an effective tool for debunking political rumors, risks remain. Drawing upon research from psychology on ‘fluency’ – the ease of information recall – this article argues that rumors acquire power through familiarity. Attempting to quash rumors through direct refutation may facilitate their diffusion by increasing fluency. The empirical results find that merely repeating a rumor increases its power.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Political Science (email: berinsky@mit.edu). For valuable discussions regarding this article, I would like to thank seminar participants at The California Institute of Technology, Florida State University, MIT, University of Michigan, The West Coast Experiments Conference and Yale University. Special thanks go to Jamie Druckman, Gabe Lenz, Michael Tesler and Nick Valentino for detailed comments. I thank Justin de Benedictis-Kessner, Daniel de Kadt, Seth Dickinson, Daniel Guenther, Krista Loose, Michele Margolis and Mike Sances for research assistance. Financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation (SES-1015335), the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences and MIT. Data replication sets and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123415000186.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Allport, Gordon W., and Postman, Leo. 1947. The Psychology of Rumor. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Alter, Adam L., and Oppenheimer, Daniel. 2009. Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review 13 (3):219235.
Bargh, John A., Bond, Ronald N., Lombardi, Wendy J., and Tota, Mary E.. 1986. The Additive Nature of Chronic and Temporary Sources of Construct Accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:869878.
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions. Political Behavior 24 (2):117150.
Begg, Ian Maynard, Anas, Ann, and Farinacci, Suzanne. 1992. Dissociation of Processes in Belief: Source Recollection, Statement Familiarity, and the Illusion of Truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology 121 (4):446458.
Berinsky, Adam J., Margolis, Michele F., and Sances, Michael W.. 2014. Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys. American Journal of Political Science 58 (3):739753.
Bhavnani, Ravi, Findley, Michael G., and Kuklinski, James H.. 2009. Rumor Dynamics in Ethnic Violence. The Journal of Politics 71 (3):876892.
Bolten, Catherine. 2014. Sobel Truths and Tribal Truths: Narrative and Politics in Sierra Leone, 1994. Comparative Studies in Society and History 56:187214.
Brotherton, Robert, French, Christopher C., and Pickering, Alan D.. 2013. Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Psychology 4 (279):115.
Bruder, Martin, Haffke, Peter, Neave, Nick, Nouripanah, Nina, and Imhoff, Roland. 2013. Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: The Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology 4 (225):115.
Calvert, Randall L. 1985. The Value of Biased Information: A Rational Choice Model of Political Advice. The Journal of Politics 47 (2):530555.
DiFonzo, Nicholas, and Bordia, Prashant. 2007. Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Donovan, Pamela. 2007. How Idle is Idle Talk? One Hundred Years of Rumor Research. Diogenes 54 (1):5982.
Druckman, James N., and Nelson, Kjersten R.. 2003. Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science 47 (4):729745.
Ecker, Ullrich K.H., Lewandowsky, Stephan, Swire, Briony, and Chang, Darren. 2011. Correcting False Information in Memory: Manipulating the Strength of Misinformation Encoding and its Retraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18 (3):570578.
Fine, Gary Allen, and Ellis, Bill. 2010. The Global Grapevine: Why Rumors of Terrorism, Immigration, and Trade Matter. New York: Oxford University Press.
Finnström, Sverker. 2009. Gendered War and Rumors of Saddam Hussein in Uganda. Anthropology and Humanism 34 (1):6170.
Gilbert, Daniel T., Tafarodi, Romin W., and Malone, Patrick S.. 1993. You Can’t Not Believe Everything You Read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:221233.
Gilens, Martin. 2001. Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences. The American Political Science Review 95 (2):379396.
Huang, Haifeng. 2014. A War of (Mis)Information: The Political Effects of Rumors and Rumor Rebuttals in an Authoritarian Country, working paper. University of California, Merced. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2131538, accessed 6 April 2015.
Jacoby, Larry L., and Dallas, Mark. 1981. On the Relationship Between Autobiographical Memory and Perceptual Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 110 (3):306340.
Jo, Dong-Gi. 2002. Diffusion of Rumors on the Internet. The Information Society Review 2002:7795.
Johnson, Hollyn M., and Seifert, Colleen. 1994. Sources of the Continued Influence Effect: When Misinformation in Memory Affects Later Inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 (6):14201436.
Keeley, Brian L. 1999. Of Conspiracy Theories. The Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):109126.
Krosnick, Jon A. 1991. Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5:213236.
Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Jerit, Jennifer, Schwieder, David, and Rich, Robert F.. 2000. Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship. The Journal of Politics 62 (3):790816.
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 8 (3):480498.
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ecker, Ullrich K.H., Seifert, Colleen M., Schwarz, Norbert, and Cook, John. 2012. Misinformation and its Correction Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13 (3):106131.
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Matthew. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ma, Ringo. 2008. Spread of SARS and War-Related Rumors Through New Media in China. Communication Quarterly 56 (4):376391.
Nyhan, Brendan. 2010. Why the ‘Death Panel’ Myth Wouldn’t Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate. The Forum 8 (1):124.
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2009. The Effects of Semantics and Social Desirability in Correcting the Obama Muslim Myth, working paper. Dartmouth University.
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2010. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior 32 (2):303330.
Nyhan, Brendan, Reifler, Jason, and Ubel, Peter A.. 2013. The Hazards of Correcting Myths About Health Care Reform. Medical Care 51 (2):127132.
Oliver, J. Eric, and Wood, Thomas J.. 2014. Conspiracy Theories, Magical Thinking, and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4):952966.
Oppenheimer, Daniel. 2008. The Secret Life of Fluency. Trends in Cognitive Science 12 (6):237241.
Oppenheimer, Daniel, Meyvis, Tom, and Davidenko, Nicolas. 2009. Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45:867872.
Palin, Sarah. 2009. Statement on the Current Health Care Debate. Facebook post. Available from https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=113851103434, accessed 6 April 2015.
Petty, Richard E., and Cacioppo, John T.. 1986. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19:123205.
Pipes, Daniel. 1998. The Hidden Hand: Middle East Fears of Conspiracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Prasad, Monica, Perrin, Andrew J., Bezila, Kieran, Hoffman, Steve G., Kindleberger, Kate, Manturuk, Kim, and Powers, Ashleigh Smith. 2009. ‘There Must be a Reason’: Osama, Saddam, and Inferred Justification. Sociological Inquiry 79 (2):142162.
Schwarz, Norbert. 2004. Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14:332348.
Schwarz, Norbert, Sanna, Lawrence J., Skurnik, Ian, and Yoon, Carolyn. 2007. Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 39:127161.
Simmons, Joseph, Nelson, Leif D., and Simonsohn, Uri. 2011. False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Psychological Science 22:13591366.
Sunstein, Cass R.. 2009. On Rumors: How Falsehoods Spread, Why We Believe Them, What Can Be Done. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):755769.
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211 (4481):453458.
Wood, Michael J., Douglas, Karen M., and Sutton, Robbie M.. 2012. Dead and Alive Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3 (6):767773.
Zonis, Marvin, and Joseph, Craig M.. 1994. Conspiracy Thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology 15 (3):443459.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Berinsky supplemenray material
Supplementary Appendices

 PDF (365 KB)
365 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Berinsky supplemetary material
Supplementary data sets

 Unknown (44 KB)
44 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed