Skip to main content Accesibility Help

What Makes People Worry about the Welfare State? A Three-Country Experiment

  • Achim Goerres (a1), Rune Karlsen (a2) and Staffan Kumlin (a3)

Welfare states are exposed to a host of cost-inducing ‘reform pressures’. An experiment implemented in Germany, Norway and Sweden tests how various reform pressure frames affect perceptions about the future financial sustainability of the welfare state. Such perceptions have been shown to moderate electoral punishment for welfare reform, but little is known about their origins. Hypotheses are formulated in dialogue with newer research on welfare state change, as well as with older theory expecting more stability in policy and attitudes (the ‘new politics’ framework). Research drawing on ‘deservingness theory’ is also consulted. The results suggest large variations in impact across treatments. The most influential path to effective pressure framing is to ‘zoom in’ on specific economic pressures linked to undeserving groups (above all immigration, but also to some extent low employment). Conversely, a message emphasizing pressure linked to a very deserving group (population aging) had little effect. A second conceivable path to pressure framing entails ‘zooming out’ – making messages span a diverse and more broadly threatening set of challenges. This possibility, however, received weaker support.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email:
Hide All
Aalberg, T, Shanto, I Messing, S (2012) Who is a ‘deserving’ immigrant? an experimental study of Norwegian attitudes. Scandinavian Political Studies 35 (2):97116.
Armingeon, K Giger, N (2008) Conditional punishment: a comparative analysis of the electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment in OECD nations, 1980–2003. West European Politics 31 (3):558580.
Arndt, C (2014) The electoral consequences of reforming a Bismarckian Welfare State. In Kumlin S and Stadelmann-Steffen I, (eds), How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public: Policy Feedback, Participation, Voting, and Attitudes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 132155.
Baumgartner, FR et al. (2009) Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective. American Journal of Political Science 53 (3):603620.
Bay, A-H, Hatland, A, Hellevik, T Koren, C, (eds) (2010) De norske trygdene, [The Norwegian Social Security]. Oslo: Gyldendal.
Bay, A-H, Finseraas, H Pedersen, AW (2016) Welfare nationalism and popular support for raising the child allowance: evidence from a Norwegian survey experiment. Scandinavian Political Studies 39 (4):482494.
Bay, A-H Pedersen, AW (2006) The limits of social solidarity: basic income, immigration and the legitimacy of the universal welfare state. Acta Sociologica 49 (4):419436.
Beramendi, P et al. (eds) (2015) The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bonoli, G (2005) The politics of new social policies: providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states. Policy and Politics 33 (3):431449.
Bonoli, G (2012) Blame avoidance and credit claiming revisited. In Bonoli G and Natali D, (eds), The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93110.
Brochmann, G Grødem, AS (2013) Migration and welfare sustainability. The case of Norway. In Brochmann G and Jurado E, (eds), Europe’s Immigration Challenge. Reconciling Work, Welfare and Mobility. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 5976.
Brooks, C (2011) Framing theory, welfare attitudes, and the United States case. In Svallfors S, (ed.), Constested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond, edited by Stefan. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 193221.
Cappelen, C Midtbø, T (2016) Intra-EU labour migration and support for the Norwegian welfare state. European Sociological Review 32 (6):691703.
Chong, D Druckman, JN (2007) Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10, 103126.
Cox, RH (2001) The social construction of an imperative: why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany. World Politics 53, 463498.
Downs, A (1972) Up and down with ecology: the issue–attention cycle. Public Interest 28, 3846.
Druckman, JN et al. (eds) (2011) Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elmelund-Præstekær, C Emmenegger, P (2013) Strategic re-framing as a vote winner: why vote-seeking governments pursue unpopular reforms. Scandinavian Political Studies 36 (1):2342.
Entman, RM (1993) Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4):5158.
Esmark, A Schoop, SR (2017) Deserving social benefits? Political framing and media framing of ‘deservingness’ in two welfare reforms in Denmark. Journal of European Social Policy 27 (5):417432.
Ferrera, M (2008) The European welfare state: golden achievements, silver prospects. West European Politics 31 (1–2):82107.
Fietkau, S Hansen, KM (2018) How perceptions of immigrants trigger feelings of economic and cultural threats in two welfare states. European Union Politics 19 (1):119139.
Giger, N (2011) The Risk of Social Policy: The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment and Social Policy Performance in OECD Countries. London: Routledge.
Giger, N Nelson, N (2013) The welfare state or the economy? Preferences, constituencies, and strategies for retrenchment. European Sociological Review 29 (5):10831094.
Goerres, Achim, Karlsen, Rune Kumlin, Staffan (2018) Replication data for: What Makes People Worry About the Welfare State? A Three Country Experiment,, Harvard Dataverse, V1.
Goerres, A Tepe, M (2012) Doing it for the kids? The determinants of attitudes towards public childcare in unified Germany. Journal of Social Policy 41 (2):349372.
Goerres, A Vanhuysse, P (2012) Mapping the field: comparative generational politics and policies in ageing democracies. In Vanhuysse P and Goerres A, (eds), Ageing Populations in Post-Industrial Democracies: Comparative Studies of Politics and Policies. London: Routledge, pp. 122.
Hemerijck, A (2013) Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hjorth, F (2016) Who benefits? Welfare chauvinism and national stereotypes. European Union Politics 17 (1):324.
Hood, C (2007) What happens when transparency meets blame avoidance. Public Management Review 9 (2):191210.
Jacobs, A (2016) Policy making for the long term in advanced democracies. Annual Review of Political Science 19, 433454.
Jakobsson, N Kumlin, S (2017) Election campaigns, government partisanship, and the welfare state. European Political Science Review 9 (2):183208.
Jensen, C Naumann, E (2016) Increasing pressures and support for public healthcare in Europe. Health Policy 120, 698705.
Jerit, J Barabas, J (2006) Bankrupt rhetoric: how misleading information affects knowledge about social security. Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (3):278303.
Kangas, OE, Niemelä, M Varjonen, S (2014) When and why do ideas matter? The Influence of Framing on Opinion Formation and Policy Change. European Political Science Review 6 (1):7392.
Korpi, W Palme, J (2003) New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review 97, 425446.
Kuipers, S (2006) The Crisis Imperative: Crisis Rhetoric and Welfare State Reform in Belgium and the Netherlands in the Early 1990s. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kumlin, S (2007) Overloaded or undermined? European welfare states in the face of performance dissatisfaction. In Svallfors S, (ed.), The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Orientations. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 80116.
Levi, M (1997) Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, JD (2010) Welfare retrenchment. In Castles FG et al (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 552569.
Lewis-Beck, MS Stegmaier, M (2007) Economic models of voting. In Dalton RJ and Klingemann H-D, (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 518537.
Lindbom, A (2007) Obfuscating retrenchment: Swedish welfare policy in the 1990s. Journal of Public Policy 27 (2):129150.
Lindbom, A (2014) Waking up the giant: hospital closures and electoral punishment in Sweden. In Kumlin S and Stadelmann-Steffen I, (eds), How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public: Policy Feedback, Participation, Voting, and Attitudes, edited by Staffan and Isabelle. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 156180.
Mau, S (2003) The Moral Economy of Welfare States: Britain and Germany Compared. London: Routledge.
Morel, N, Palier, B Palme, J (eds) (2012) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State?. Bristol: Policy Press.
Naumann, E (2014) Raising the retirement age: retrenchment, feedback, and attitudes. In Kumlin S and Stadelmann-Steffen I, (eds), How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public: Policy Feedback, Participation, and Attitudes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 223243.
Naumann, E (2017) Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge, and ideology. Ageing and Society 37 (2):266294.
Naumann, E Stoetzer, LF (2018) Immigration and support for redistribution: survey experiments in three European countries. West European Politics 41 (1):80101.
NOU (2011) Velferd og migrasjon. Den norske modellens framtid. [Welfare and Migration. The Future of the Norwegian Model]. Stockholm: NOU.
Oscarsson, H Holmberg, S (2013) Nya svenska väljare [New Swedish Voters]. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
Palier, B (ed.) (2010) A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Palier, B Martin, C (2007) Editorial introduction: from ‘a frozen landscape’ to structural reforms: the sequential transformation of Bismarckian Welfare systems. Social Policy & Administration 41 (6):535554.
Petersen, MB et al. (2010) Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: the automaticity of the deservingness heuristic. European Journal of Political Research 50, 2452.
Petersen, M et al. (2012) Who deserves help? Evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about welfare. Political Psychology 33 (3):395418.
Pierson, P (1996) The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics 48 (2):143179.
Pierson, P (ed.) (2001) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roosma, F, Gelissen, J van Oorschot, W (2013) The multidimensionality of welfare state attitudes: a European cross-national study. Social Indicators Research 113, 235255.
Rothstein, B (1998) Just Institutions Matter. The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, VA (2002) Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment? Comparative Political Studies 35 (2):168193.
Scruggs, L (2008) Social rights, welfare generosity, and inequality. In Beramendi P and Anderson CJ (eds), Democracy, Inequality, and Representation. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, pp. 6290.
Shaffer, JP (1995) Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology 46 (1):561584.
Slothuus, R (2007) Framing deservingness to win support for welfare state retrenchment. Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (3):323344.
Soroka, SN Wlezien, C (2010) Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soss, J Schram, S (2007) A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review 101 (1):111127.
Starke, P (2008) Radical Welfare State Retrechment. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Stiller, S (2010) Ideational Leadership in German Welfare State Reform: How Politicians and Policy Ideas Transform Resilient Institutions. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Stokes, DE (1963) Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review 57, 368377.
Svallfors, S (2012) Welfare states and welfare attitudes. In Svallfors S (ed.), Contested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 124.
Taber, CS Lodge, M (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):755769.
Taylor-Gooby, P (ed.) (2001) Welfare States under Pressure. London: Sage Publications.
Tyler, TR et al. (1997) Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
van Kersbergen, K, Vis, B Hemerijck, A (2014) The great recession and welfare state reform: is retrenchment really the only game left in town? Social Policy & Administration 48 (7):883904.
van Oorschot, W (2000) Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the Public. Policy and Politics 28 (1):3348.
van Oorschot, W (2006) Making the difference in social europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy 16 (1):2344.
van Oorschot, W et al. (eds) (2017) The Social Legitimacy of Social Welfare: Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Vis, B (2016) Taking stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 18 (2):122137.
Wenzelburger, G Hörisch, F (2016) Framing effects and comparative social policy reform: comparing blame avoidance evidence from two experiments. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 18 (2):157175.
Zaller, JR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zohlnhöfer, R (2015) A coalition whose time had already passed...the economic and social polices of the second Merkel government. In D’Ottavio G and Saalfeld T (eds), Germany after the 2013 Elections: Breaking the Mould of Post-Unification Politics?. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 1330.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Goerres et al. Dataset

Supplementary materials

Goerres et al. supplementary material

 Word (52 KB)
52 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed