Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T16:52:33.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4.2 Parenteral Methods of Trace Element Supplementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

W. M. Allen
Affiliation:
ARC Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire, RG16 0NN
P. R. Moore
Affiliation:
ARC Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire, RG16 0NN
Get access

Extract

Dietary manipulations or other oral treatments are, in many cases, the most efficient solution to the problem of trace element deficiency diseases in farm animals. Such approaches are particularly effective against chronic primary deficiencies where there is simply not enough of the required element in the diet to satisfy the animal's needs.

In some situations, however, notably severe and acute deficiencies, parenteral injections of a supplement provide the best methods of restoring normal mineral concentrations in the deficient animal's tissues. Parenteral supplements are also particularly effective against many secondary deficiences in which factors in the diet convert apparently adequate dietary concentrations of the required element into an unavailable form: their effectiveness arises because absorption from the alimentary canal is bypassed. Injectable trace element supplements have also proved particularly useful for short term supplementation during periods when there is a great demand for the element, for instance during pregnancy. One further advantage of the parenteral route of supplementation is that a known amount of the element is introduced into the animal's system.

Type
4. Prevention of Disease
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allcroft, R., Buntain, D. and Rowlands, W. T. 1965. Administration of copper to lambs for prevention of delayed swayback: possible toxic effects. Vet. Rec. 77: 634.Google ScholarPubMed
Allcroft, R. and Uvarov, O. 1959. Parenteral administration of copper compounds to cattle with special reference to copper glycine (copper amino acetate). Vet. Rec. 71: 797810.Google Scholar
Anon. 1980. Copper deficiency in cattle. Vet. Rec. 106: 494495.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Chamberlain, A. G., Kotarbinska, M. and Mitchell, K. G. 1962. The metabolism of iron in piglets given labelled iron either orally or by injection. Br. J. Nutr. 16: 427449.Google Scholar
Camargo, W. V. de A., Lee, H. J. and Dewey, D. W. 1962. The suitability of some copper preparations for parenteral copper therapy in sheep. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 4: 1217.Google Scholar
Caravaggi, C., Clark, F. L. and Jackson, A. R. B. 1970. Acute selenium toxicity in lambs following intramuscular injection of sodium selenite. Res. vet. Sci. 11: 146149.Google Scholar
Cunningham, I. J. 1959. Parenteral administration of copper to sheep. N.Z. vet. J. 7: 1517.Google Scholar
Deland, M. P. B., Cunningham, P., Milne, M. L. and Dewey, D. W. 1979. Copper administration to young calves: oral dosing with copper oxide compared with subcutaneous copper glycinate injection. Aust. vet. J. 55: 493494.Google Scholar
Drake, C. F. 1978. British Patent No. 1512637.Google Scholar
Drake, C., Grant, A. B. and Hartley, W. J. 1960. Selenium and animal health. N.Z. vet. J. 8: 710.Google Scholar
Gleed, P. T., Allen, W. M., Mallinson, C. B., Rowlands, G. J., Sansom, B. F., Vagg, M. J. and Caswell, R. D. 1983. The effects of selenium and copper supplementation on the growth of beef steers. Vet. Rec. In press.Google Scholar
Hartley, W. J. 1967. Levels of selenium in animal tissues and methods of selenium administration. Symposium Selenium in Biomedicine (ed. Muth, O. H. et al.), pp. 7996. Avi Publishing Co., Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Harvey, J. M. and Sutherland, A. K. 1953. Parenteral copper therapy in ruminants. Aust. vet. J. 29: 261268.Google Scholar
Herigstad, R. R. and Whitehair, C. K. 1974. Local and systemic effects of parenteral injections of selenite in cattle and swine. Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin. 64: 10351038.Google Scholar
Hidiroglou, M., Hoffman, I., Jenkins, K. J. and Mackay, R. R. 1971. Control of nutritional muscular dystrophy in lambs by selenium supplementation. Anim. Prod. 13: 315321.Google Scholar
Hidiroglou, M., Jenkins, K. J., Wauthy, J. M. and Proulx, J. E. 1972. A note on the prevention of nutritional muscular dystrophy by winter silage feeding of the cow or selenium implantation of the calf. Anim. Prod. 14: 115118.Google Scholar
Hopson, J. H. and Ashmead, D. 1976. Iron deficiencies and their relationship to infectious disease. Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin. 71: 809811.Google Scholar
Ishmael, J., Howell, J. McC. and Treeby, P. J. 1969. Death in ewes following the administration of copper calcium edetate for prevention of sway¬back. Vet. Rec. 85: 205206.Google Scholar
Ishmael, J., Howell, J. McC., Treeby, P. J. and Bramley, P. S. 1977. Copper methionate for parenteral copper therapy in sheep. Vet. Rec. 101: 410.Google Scholar
Jamieson, S. and Allcroft, R. 1950. Copper pine of calves. Br. J. Nutr. 4: 1631.Google Scholar
Lamand, M. 1978. Copper deficiency prophylaxis in grazing sheep by copper oxide injection. Ann. Rech. Vet. 9: 501504.Google ScholarPubMed
Little, W., Vagg, M. J., Collis, K. A., Shaw, S. R. and Gleed, P. T. 1979. The effects of subcutaneous injections of sodium selenate on blood composition and milk yield in dairy cows. Res. vet. Sci. 26: 193197.Google Scholar
Mallinson, C. B., Sansom, B. F. and Drake, C. F. 1980. Controlled release glasses (CRG) for supplementing animals with copper. In Metabolic Disorders in Farm Animals, pp. 272275. Proc. IVth Int. Conference on Production Disease in Farm Animals, Munich.Google Scholar
Moore, P., Hall, G. A., Sansom, B. F. and Drake, C. F. 1982. The use of copper-containing controlled release glass for systemic supplementation of sheep with Cu. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 41: 84A.Google Scholar
Mylrea, P. J. and Byrne, D. T. 1974. An outbreak of acute copper poisoning in calves. Aust. vet. J. 50: 169172.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. S. P., Allen, W. M., Berrete, Sylvia, Sweasey, D., Thurley, D. C. and Done, J. T. 1969. A biochemical study of the pathogenesis of iron-induced myodegeneration of piglets. Zbl. vet. Med., A. 16: 199214.Google Scholar
Sutherland, A. K., Moule, G. R. and Harvey, J. M. 1955. On the toxicity of copper amino acetate injection and copper sulphate drench for sheep. Aust. vet. J. 31: 141145.Google Scholar
Suttle, N. F. 1974. Effects of molybdenum and sulphur at concentrations commonly found in ruminant diets on the availability of copper to sheep. In Trace Element Metabolism in Animals2 (ed. Hoekstra, W. G., Suttie, J. W., Ganther, K. E. and Mertz, W.), pp. 612614. University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Suttle, N. F. 1981. Comparison between parenterally administered copper complexes of their ability to alleviate hypocupraemia in sheep and cattle. Vet. Rec. 109: 304307.Google Scholar
Suveges, T. and Glavits, R. 1976. Piglet loss due to parenteral iron dextran preparations. Acta Vet. Sci. Hung. 26: 257262.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. and MacLeod, N. S. M. 1970. Breed, bodyweight and age as factors in mortality of sheep following copper injection. Vet. Rec. 86: 740742.Google Scholar
Venn, J. A. J., Mccance, R. A. and Widdowson, E. M. 1974. Iron metabolism in piglet anaemia. J. Comp. Path. 57: 314325.Google Scholar