Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T04:57:36.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Options for genetic improvement of milk composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J.P. Gibson*
Affiliation:
Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Get access

Abstract

Genetic improvement is constrained by the long-term and cumulate nature of genetic improvement, by the economic rewards for making genetic change and by the variances and covariances among traits of interest. Genetic change is cumulate, so that small annual changes make substantial differences over time. This cumulate nature of genetic improvement dictates the importance of identifying long-term goals driven by robust economic signals and then adhering to them. The economic rewards for genetic improvement will ultimately determine the uptake and therefore the success of any breeding program. In developed countries the value of milk can be divided between the weight of water, fat and protein produced. Water generally has a negative value due the cost of handling, removal and disposal. Fat and protein have varying values depending on the market, but both will always have underlying positive values. Genetic variances and covariances among the aggregate composition traits, water, fat and protein, are such that simultaneous increase in the yield of all three is considerably easier than improvement of just one, or improvement of one while decreasing others. Selection for simultaneous increase of fat and protein percentage will also be successful, but at the price of not increasing fat and protein yield nearly as rapidly as when selecting directly on yield traits. In virtually all developed countries, the optimum selection goal will be for some combination of increased fat and protein yield that may lead to a gradual increase in the protein to fat ratio. Genetic polymorphisms in several protein genes have been associated with yield and with milk processing properties, but are unlikely to play more than a minor role in overall selection. There is some evidence of genetic variation in milk fat composition, but the level of variation and economic incentives for change mean that selection for milk fat composition is not worthwhile. Thus, with the exception of very slow changes in the water to fat to protein yield ratio, genetic improvement does not seem a particularly suitable route for altering milk composition.

Type
Potential economic benefits of altering milk composition and the role of the animal breeder
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aleandri, R., Buttazzoni, L.G., Schneider, J.C., Caroli, A. and Davoli, R. 1990. The effects of milk protein polymorphisms on milk components and cheese-producing ability. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 241255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boettcher, P.J., Dekkers, J.C. and Kolstad, B.W. 1998. Development of an udder health index for sire selection based on somatic cell score, udder conformation, and milking speed. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 11571168.Google Scholar
Bovenhuis, H. and Van Arendonk, J.A. 1991. Estimation of milk protein gene frequencies in crossbred cattle by maximum likelihood. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 27282736.Google Scholar
Bovenhuis, H., Van Arendonk, J.A. and Korver, S. 1992. Associations between milk protein polymorphisms and milk production traits. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 25492559.Google Scholar
Bremel, R.D. 1996. Potential role of transgenesis in dairy production and related areas. Theriogenology 45: 5156.Google Scholar
Cassell, B.G. 1994. Using somatic cell score evaluations for management decisions. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 21302136.Google Scholar
Coulon, J.B., Hurtaud, C., Remond, B. and Verite, R. 1998. Factors contributing to variation in the proportion of casein in cows’ milk true protein: a review of recent INRA experiments. Journal of Dairy Research 65: 375387.Google Scholar
Cowan, C.M., Dentine, M.R. and Coyle, T. 1992. Chromosome substitution effects associated with kappa-casein and beta-lactoglobulin in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 10971104.Google Scholar
Dekkers, J.C.M., Birke, P. and Gibson, J.P. 1995. Optimum linear selection indexes for multiple generation objectives with non-linear profit functions. Journal of Animal Science 61: 165175.Google Scholar
Dekkers, J.C.M., Erp, T.V. and Schukken, Y.H. 1996. Economic benefits of reducing somatic cell count under the milk quality program of Ontario. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 396401.Google Scholar
Dietz, A.B., Cohen, N.D., Timms, L. and Kehrli, M.E.J. 1997. Bovine lymphocyte antigen class 11 alieles as risk factors for high somatic cell counts in milk of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 406412.Google Scholar
Falaki, M., Prandi, A., Corradini, C., Sneyers, M., Gengler, N., Massart, S., Fazzini, U., Burny, A., Portetelle, D. and Renaville, R. 1997. Relationships of growth hormone gene and milk protein polymorphisms to milk production traits in Simmental cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 64: 4756.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.P. 1987. The options and prospects for genetically altering milk composition in dairy cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 55: 231243.Google Scholar
J.P., Gibson 1989a. Altering milk composition through genetic selection. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 28152825.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.P. 1989b. Economic weights and index selection of milk production traits when multiple production quotas apply. Animal Production 49: 171181.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.P. 1989c. The effect of pricing systems, economic weights and population parameters on economic response to selection on milk components. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 33143326.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.P. 1989d. Selection on the major components of milk: alternative methods of deriving economic weights. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 31763189.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.P. 1991. The potential for genetic change of milk fat composition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 32583266.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.P., Graham, N.C. and Burnside, E.B. 1992. Selection indexes for production traits of Canadian dairy sires. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72: 477491.Google Scholar
Gonyon, D.S., Mather, R.E., Hines, H.C., Haenlein, G.F., Arave, C.W. and Gaunt, S.N. 1987a. Associations of bovine blood and milk polymorphisms with lactation traits: Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 25852598.Google Scholar
Graham, E.R.B., McLean, D.M. and Zviedrans, P. 1984. The effect of milk protein genotypes on the cheesemaking properties of milk and on the yield of cheese. Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Adelaide, Australia. Google Scholar
Groen, A.F. 1988. Derivation of economic values in cattle breeding: a model at farm level. Agricultural Systems 27: 195213.Google Scholar
Groen, A.F. 1989a. Economic values in cattle breeding. I Influences of production circumstances in situations without output limitations. Livestock Production Science 22: 116.Google Scholar
A.F., Groen 1989b. Economic values in cattle breeding. 11 Influences of production circumstances in situations with output limitations. Livestock Production Science 22: 1730.Google Scholar
Groen, A.F. 1990. Influences of production circumstances on the economic revenue of cattle breeding programmes. Animal Production 51: 469480.Google Scholar
Groenen, M.A.M. 1994. Regulation of expression of milk protein genes: a review. Livestock Production Science 38: 6178.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Adán, A., Maga, E.A., Meade, H., Shoemaker, C.F., Medrano, J.F., Anderson, G.B. and Murray, J.D. 1996. Alterations of the physical characteristics of milk from transgenic mice producing bovine kappa-casein. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 791799.Google Scholar
Haenlein, G.F., Gonyon, D.S., Mather, R.E. and Hines, H.C. 1987. Associations of bovine blood and milk polymorphisms with lactation traits: Guernseys. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 25992609.Google Scholar
Hoeschele, I. 1990. Potential gain from insertion of major genes into dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 26012618.Google Scholar
Hortet, P. and Seegers, H. 1998. Calculated milk production losses associated with elevated somatic cell counts in dairy cows: review and critical discussion. Veterinary Research 29: 497510.Google Scholar
Jänne, J., Alhonen, L., Hyttinen, J.M., Peura, T., Tolvanen, M. and Korhonen, V.P. 1998. Transgenic bioreactors. Biotechnology Annual Review 4: 5574.Google Scholar
Kroeker, E.M., Ng-Kwai-Hang, K.F., Hayes, J.F. and Moxley, J.E. 1985a. Effect of β-lactoglobulin variant and environmental factors on variation in the detailed composition of bovine milk serum proteins. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 16371641.Google Scholar
Kroeker, E.M., Ng-Kwai-Hang, K.F., Hayes, J.F. and Moxley, J.E. 1985b. Effects of environmental factors and milk protein polymorphism on composition of casein fraction in bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 17521757.Google Scholar
Lien, S., Gomez-Raya, L., Steine, T., Fimland, E. and Rogne, S. 1995. Associations between casein haplotypes and milk yield traits. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 20472056.Google Scholar
Lin, C.Y., McAllister, A.J., Ng-Kwai-Hang, K.F. and Hayes, J.F. 1986. Effects of milk protein loci on first lactation production in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 704712.Google Scholar
Lund, M.S., Jensen, J. and Petersen, P.H. 1999. Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell production deviance, and protein yield in dairy cattle using Gibbs sampling. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 10451051.Google Scholar
Manfredi, E.J., Everett, R.W. and Searle, S.R. 1984. Phenotypic and genetic statistics of components of milk and two measures of somatic cell concentration. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 20282033.Google Scholar
Mao, I.L., Buttazzoni, L.G. and Aleandri, R. 1991. Assessment of single genic effects of milk protein polymorphism on yield traits in Holstein cattle. 42nd Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Berlin, Germany. Google Scholar
Marziali, A.S. and Ng-Kwai-Hang, K.F. 1986a. Effects of milk composition and genetic polymorphism on coagulation properties of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 17931798.Google Scholar
Marziali, A.S. and Ng-Kwai-Hang, K.F. 1986b. Relationships between milk protein polymorphisms and cheese yielding capacity. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 11931201.Google Scholar
McLean, D.M., Graham, E.R., Ponzoni, R.W. and McKenzie, H.A. 1984. Effects of milk protein genetic variants on milk yield and composition. Journal of Dairy Research 51: 531546.Google Scholar
McLean, D.M. and Schaar, J. 1989. Effects of β-lactoglobulin and κ-casein genetic variants and concentrations on syneresis of gels from renneted heated milk. Journal of Dairy Research 56: 297301.Google Scholar
Monardes, H.G. and Hayes, J.F. 1985. Genetic and phenotypic relationships between lactation cell counts and milk yield and composition of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 12501256.Google Scholar
Ng-Kwai-Hang, K.F., Hayes, J.F., Moxley, J.E. and Monardes, H.G. 1984. Association of genetic variants of casein and milk serum proteins with milk, fat, and protein production by dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 835840.Google Scholar
Ng-Kwai-Hang, K.F., Hayes, J.F., Moxley, J.E. and Monardes, H.G. 1986. Relationships between milk protein polymorphisms and major milk constituents in Holstein-Friesian cows. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 2226.Google Scholar
Ng-Kwai-Hang, K.F., Hayes, J.F., Moxley, J.E. and Monardes, H.G. 1987. Variation in milk protein concentrations associated with genetic polymorphism and environmental factors. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 563570.Google Scholar
Ojala, M., Famula, T.R. and Medrano, J.F. 1997. Effects of milk protein genotypes on the variation for milk production traits of Holstein and Jersey cows in California. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 17761785.Google Scholar
Rizzi, R., Caroli, A., Bolla, P. and Pagnacco, G. 1991. Estimate of the effect of major genes on some aspects of milk production in cows. Zootecnica E. Nutrizione Animale 17: 181186.Google Scholar
Ron, M., Yoffe, O., Ezra, E., Medrano, J.F. and Weller, J.I. 1994. Determination of effects of milk protein genotype on production traits of Israeli Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 11061113.Google Scholar
Schaar, J. 1984. Effects of κ-casein genetic variants and lactation number on the renneting properties of individual milks. Journal of Dairy Research 51: 397406.Google Scholar
Schaar, J. 1985. Effects of genetic variants of κ-casein and β-lactoglobulin on cheesemaking. Journal of Dairy Research 52: 429437.Google Scholar
Shook, G.E. and Schutz, M.M. 1994. Selection on somatic cell score to improve resistance to mastitis in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 648658.Google Scholar
Threadgill, D.W. and Womack, J.E. 1990. Genomic analysis of the major bovine milk protein genes. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 69356942.Google Scholar
Van Eenennaam, A. and Medrano, J.F. 1991a. Milk protein polymorphisms in California dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 17301742.Google Scholar
Van Eenennaam, A.L. and Medrano, J.F. 1991b. Differences in allelic protein expression in the milk of heterozygous kappa-casein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 14911496.Google Scholar
Velmala, R., Vilkki, J., Elo, K. and Mäki-Tanila, A. 1995. Casein haplotypes and their association with milk production traits in the Finnish Ayrshire cattle. Animal Genetics 26: 419425.Google Scholar
Wall, R.J. 1996. Transgenic livestock: progress and prospects for the future. Theriogenology 45: 5768.Google Scholar
Walstra, P. 1990. On the stability of casein micelles. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 19651979.Google Scholar
Wilmut, I. and Whitelaw, C.B. 1994. Strategies for production of pharmaceutical proteins in milk. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 6: 625630.Google Scholar
Yom, H.C. and Bremel, R.D. 1993. Genetic engineering of milk composition: modification of milk components in lactating transgenic animals. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58: 299S306S.Google Scholar