Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T20:31:32.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Going-down underrings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

David E. Dobbs
David E. Dobbs
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let R be an integral domain with quotient field K. Ten conditions equivalent to “Either R is algebraic over ℤ or t.d.(R/Fp) ≤ 1 for some p” are given. One of these conditions, referred to in the title, is “Each extension of subrings of R having quotient field K satisfies the going-down property.” As consequences, other classes of rings are also characterised.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , December 1987 , pp. 503 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1987

References

[1]Bourbaki, N., Commutative algebra (Addison-wesley, Reading, Mass., 1972).Google Scholar
[2]Dawson, J. and Dobbs, D.E., “On going-down in polynomial rings,” Canad. J. Math. 26 (1974), 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Dobbs, D.E., “On going-down for simple overrings, II,” Comm. Algebra 1 (1974), 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Dobbs, D.E., “Lying-over pairs of commutative rings,” Canad. J. Math. 33 (1981), 454–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Dobbs, D.E., “On seminormal subrings,” Math. Japon. 32 (1987), 11–15.Google Scholar
[6]Dobbs, D.E. and Fontana, M., “Locally pseudo-valuation domains,” Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 134 (1983), 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Dobbs, D.E. and Mulay, S.B., “Domains integral over each underring”, (submitted).Google Scholar
[8]Dobbs, D.E. and Mulay, S.B., “Flat underrings,” Arch. Math., (to appear).Google Scholar
[9]Dobbs, D.E. and Papick, I.J., “Going-down: a survey,” Nieuw Arch. Wisk. 26 (1978), 255–291.Google Scholar
[10]Gilmer, R., “Domains in which valuation ideals are prime powers,” Arch. Math. 17 (1966), 210–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Gilmer, R., “Integral domains with Noetherian subrings,” Comment. Math. Helv. 45 (1970), 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Gilmer, R. and Heinzer, W., “The quotient field of an intersection of integral domains,” J. Algebra 70 (1981), 238–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Hedstrom, J.R. and Houston, E.G., “Pseudo-valuation domains,” Pacific J. Math. 75 (1978), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Jaffard, P., Théorie de La dimension dans les anneaux de polynômes (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
[15]Kaplansky, I., Commutative rings, rev. ed. (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1974).Google Scholar
[16]Krull, W., “Beiträge zur Arithmetik kommutativer Integritätsbereiche III,” Math. Z., 42 (1937), 745–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Richman, F., “Generalized quotient rings,” Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (1965), 794–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Sheldon, P.B., “Prime ideals in GCD–domains,” Canad. J. Math. 26 (1974), 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar