Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:15:38.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tamil expressives with initial voiced stops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

M. B. Emeneau  and
Kausalya Hart
M. B. Emeneau
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Kausalya Hart
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In colloquial Tamil the form-class of expressives includes some items which have in each member of a reduplicated pair an initial voiced stop, alongside many with initial voiceless stops. This is unlike the form-classes of nouns and verbs which have in initial position only voiceless stops, except for some borrowings from Sanskrit or other sources. The writing system has no provisions for such initial voiced stops, except for a very few items with the ‘northern letter’ j-. The etymological dictionary shows that in general, when in colloquial Tamil these voiced stops appear in expressives, etyma that appear in the other Dravidian languages also have voiced stops; they are then to be reconstructed for South Dravidian or in some cases even for Proto-Dravidian, and it is to be assumed that they were found in all periods of Tamil even though they were not written as such.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 75 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annamalai, E. 1968. ‘Onomatopoeic resistance to sound change in Dravidian,’ in: Studies in Indian linguistics: M. B. Emeneau Şaşţpūrti Volume, 15–19. Poona and Annamalainagar: Deccan College and Annamalai University.Google Scholar
Bright, William. 1990. Language variation in South Asia. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, T. 1938. ‘Dravidian studies 1.’ BSOS ix, 711–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Robert. 1913. A comparative grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian family of languages. (3rd ed.) London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner and Co.Google Scholar
Catācivam, M. 1966. Dictionary of onomatopoeic expressions [olikkurippakarāti]. Madras: pāri Nilaiyam.Google Scholar
DEDR = Burrow, T., and Emeneau., M. B. 1984. A Dravidian etymological dictionary. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard. 1976. ‘Expressives in Semai,’ Austroasiatic studies (Oceanic Linguistics, special publication, 13), 249–64. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1951. Studies in Vietnamese (Annamese) grammar. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 8). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1969. –Onomatopoetics in the Indian linguistic area,’ Language, 45: 274–99 (= 1980: 250–93).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1980. Language and linguistic area: essays‖ selected… by Anwar S. Dil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1988. ‘Proto-Dravidian *c- and its developments,’ JAOS, 108: 239–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1989. ‘Phonetic laws and grammatical categories’, Proceedings of the fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 323–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedson, Vijayarani Jotimuttu. 1981. ‘Reduplication and expressivity in Tamil’, Proceedings of the fifth International Conference-Seminar of Tamil Studies, Madurai, I, 51–63. Madras: International Association of Tamil Research.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 34.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. 1961. Telugu verbal bases. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 24). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Malten, = Malten, Thomas. 1989. Reduplizierte Verbstämme im Tamil. (Beiträge zur Südasienforschung, Südasien-Institut Universität Heidelberg, 127.) Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmBh.Google Scholar
Meenakshisundaran, T. P. 1965. A history of Tamil language. (Deccan College Building Centenary and Silver Jubilee Series, 22.) Poona: Deccan College Post-graduate and Research Institute.Google Scholar
Steever, Sanford B. 1990. Review of Malten (1989), JAOS, 110: 743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subrahmanyam, P. S. 1983. Dravidian comparative phonology. (Annamalai University, Department of Linguistics, Publication, 74.) Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.Google Scholar
TL = Tamil Lexicon. 1924–1939. 6 vols. and supplement. Madras: University of Madras.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, Kamil V. 1970. Comparative Dravidian phonology. (Janua Linguarum, series practica, 80). The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, Kamil V. 1972. ‘Initial plosives in Dravidian’, Lingua, 30: 216–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zvelebil, Kamil V. 1990. Dravidian linguistics: an introduction. Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture.Google Scholar