Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

“Dark Money” and “Dirty Politics”: Are anonymous ads more negative?

Abstract
Abstract

Many scholars have studied the use of negative advertising in campaigns and what motivates candidates and groups to run negative ads. Recent elections, however, have seen a dramatic increase in advertising by outside groups, particularly by so-called “dark-money” organizations, which do not disclose their donor information. This study questions whether dark-money groups are more likely to engage in negative advertising. By examining the more than 13,000 outside-group expenditures from the 2010 through the 2014 congressional elections, it finds that outside groups are, indeed, more likely to use negative ads when they conceal their donor information. Additionally, while liberal and conservative groups are roughly equally likely to use negative ads, conservative groups are most likely to use anonymously funded negative advertisements. This could be, at least in part, due to the support conservative groups receive from organized businesses, which generally seek to conceal their political activities from public scrutiny.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Daniel E. Chand, Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Kent State University e-mail: dchand@kent.edu
Footnotes
Hide All

The author would like to thank graduate students Melanie Tellez and Paige Sharp for their help collecting data for this project and anonymous reviewers for their feedback on the manuscript. Anonymity is occasionally appropriate.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
2001. “Stealth PACs Revealed: Interest Group Profiles in the 2000 Election.” Center for Public Integrity, http://www.publicintegrity.org/assets/pdf/STEALTHPACSREVEALED.pdf, 2001 (accessed 21 April 2010).
AinsworthScott H. 2002. Analyzing Interest Groups: Group Influence on People and Policies. New York: Norton and Company.
AndersGary J. 1985. “Business Involvement in Campaign Finance: Factors Influencing the Decision to Form Corporate PAC.” PS: Political Science and Politics 18 (2): 213220.
AnsolabehereStephen and Iyengar Shanto. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
BlackwellMatthew. 2013. “A Framework for Dynamic Causal Inference in Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 504519.
BowlerShaun and ToddDonovan. 1998. Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
BriffaultRichard. 2005. “The 527 Problem… and the Buckley Problem.” George Washington University Law Review 73 (5/6): 949999.
BriffaultRichard. 2012. “Super PACs.” Minnesota Law Review 96: 16441693.
BrooksDeborah J. and Murov Michael. 2012. “Assessing Accountability in a Post-Citizens United Era: The Effects of Attack Ad Sponsorship by Unknown Independent Groups.” American Politics Research 40 (3): 383418.
Carpenter IIDick M., Primo David M., Tendetnik Pavel, and Ho Sandy. 2014. “Disclosing Disclosure: Lessons from ‘Failed’ Field Experiment.” The Forum 12 (2): 343356.
Center for Effective Government. 2012. “Senate Votes Down DISCLOSE Act.” 24 July. http://www.foreffectivegov.org/node/12149 (accessed 10 November 2015).
ChandDaniel E. 2014. “Nonprofit Electioneering Post-Citizens United: How Organizations Have Become More Complex.” Election Law Journal 13 (2): 243259.
ChandDaniel E. 2015. “Anonymous Money in Campaigns: Is Sunlight the Best Disinfectant?The Forum 13 (2): 269288.
De AlbuquerqueKlaus. 1998. “Sex, Beach Boys, and Female Tourists in the Caribbean.” Sexuality and Culture 2: 87111.
DowlingConor and Wichowsky Amber. 2015. “Attack without Consequence: Candidates, Parties, Groups and the Changing Face of Negative Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 1936.
Ellison-PotterPatricia, Bell Paul, and Deffenbacher Jerry. 2006. “The Effects of Trait Driving Anger, Anonymity, and Aggressive Stimuli on Aggressive Driving Behavior.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31 (2): 431443.
FiskeSusan T. 1980. “Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 (6): 889906.
FortierJohn C. and Malbin Michael J.. 2013. “An Agenda for Future Research on Money and Politics in the United States.” The Forum 11 (3): 455479.
FowlerErika F. and Ridout Travis N.. 2010. “Advertising Trends in 2010.” The Forum 8 (4): 116.
FowlerErika F. and Ridout Travis N.. 2012. “Negative, Angry and Ubiquitous: Political Advertising in 2012.” The Forum 10 (4): 5161.
FowlerErika F. and Ridout Travis N.. 2014. “Political Advertising in 2014: The Year of the Outside Group.” The Forum 12 (4): 663684.
FridkinKim L. and Kenney Patrick J.. 2004. “Do Negative Messages Work? The Impact of Negativity on Citizens’ Evaluations of Candidates.” American Politics Research 32 (5): 570605.
GardnerAmy and T.W.Farnam. 2011. “GOP Candidates Ramp up Negative Ads in Iowa Before Caucuses.” The Washington Post, 21 December, A4.
GarramoneGina M. 1985. “Effects of Negative Political Advertising: The Roles of Sponsor and Rebuttal.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 29: 147159.
GarramoneGina M. 1984. “Voter Responses to Negative ads.” Journalism Quarterly 61 (2): 250259.
GeerJohn G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
GlaserJack, Dixit Jay, and Green Donald P.. 2002. “Studying Hate Crime with the Internet: What Makes Racists Advocate Racial Violence?Journal of Social Issues 58 (1): 177193.
GreenbergStan and Carville James. 2012. “Voters Push Back Against Big Money Politics.” Democracy Corps, 13 November, http://www.democracycorps.com/attachments/DCorps_PCAF_memo_FINAL.pdf (accessed 19 January 2016).
HaleJon F., Fox Jeffrey C., and Farmer Rick. 1996. “Negative Advertisements in U.S. Senate Campaigns: The Influence of Campaign Context.” Social Science Quarterly 77 (2): 329343.
HadaniMichael. 2012. “Institutional Ownership Monitoring and Corporate Political Activity: Governance Implications.” Journal of Business Research 65 (7): 944950.
HansenWendy L. and Mitchell Neil J.. 2000. “Disaggregating and Explaining Corporate Political Activity: Domestic and Foreign Corporations in National Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (4): 891903.
HolmanCraig. 2004. “The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act: Limits and Opportunities for Non-Profit Groups in Federal Elections.” Northern Kentucky Law Review 31: 243288.
JamiesonKathleen H., Waldman Paul, and Sherr Susan. 2000. “Eliminate the Negative? Categories of Analysis for Political Advertisements.” In Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections, edited by Thurber James A., Nelson Candice J., and Dulio David A.. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute, 4464.
Johnson-CarteeKaren S. and Copeland Gary. 2013. Negative Political Advertising: Coming of Age. New York: Routledge.
KingserTaren and Schmidt Patrick. 2012. “Business in the Bulls-Eye? Target Corp. and the Limits of Campaign Finance Disclosure.” Election Law Journal 11 (1): 2135.
KrishnakumarAnita S. 2007. “Towards a Madisonian ‘Interest-Group’ Approach to Lobbying Regulation.” Alabama Law Review 58: 513–17.
LauRichard R. and Redlawsk David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
LauRichard R. and Pomper Gerald M.. 2004. Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
LauRichard R., Sigelman Lee, and Rovner Ivy Brown. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 11761209.
LauRichard R., Sigelman Lee, Heldman Caroline, and Babbitt Paul. 1999. “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-analytic Assessment.” American Political Science Review 93 (4): 851875.
LongScott J. 2012. “Regression Models for Nominal and Ordinal Outcomes.Regression Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
LyonThomas P. and Maxwell John W.. 2004. “Astroturf: Interest Group Lobbying and Corporate Strategy.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 13 (4): 561–97.
MartinGary. 2000. “McCain Cries Foul Over ads.” San Antonio Express-News, 7 March, 6A.
MayerLloyd Hitoshi. 2010. “Disclosures About Disclosure.” Indiana Law Review 44: 255284.
McDonnellMary-Hunter and Werner Timothy. 2016. “Blacklisted Benefactors: Social Activists’ Challenges and the Disruption of Corporate Political Activity.” Administrative Science Quarterly, http://asq.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/05/03/0001839216648953.full (accessed 7 October 2016).
MoramarcoGlenn J. 2000. “Beyond ‘Magic Words’: Using Self-disclosure to Regulate Electioneering.” Catholic University Law Review 49 (107): 19992000.
NielsenCarolyn. 2013. “Coproduction or Cohabitation: Are Anonymous Online Comments on Newspaper Websites Shaping News Content?New Media and Society 16 (3): 470487.
NovakViveca, Maguire Robert, and Overby Peter. 2013. “Wellspring's Flow: Dark Money Outfit Helps Fuel Groups on Political Front Lines.” Center for Responsive Politics, 5 November. http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2013/11/wellsprings-flow/ (accessed 29 January 2016).
PalmerAnna and Phillip Abby. 2012. “Corporations Don't Pony up for Super PACs.” m, 8 March http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73804.html (accessed 30 September 2013).
PrimoDavid. M. 2013. “Information at the Margin: Campaign Finance Disclosure Laws, Ballot Issues, and Voter Knowledge.” Election Law Journal 12 (2): 114129.
ReaderBill. 2012. “Free Press vs. Free Speech? The Rhetoric of ‘Civility’ in Regard to Anonymous Online Comments.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 89 (3): 495513.
RomitiJonathan. 2012. “Playing Politics with Shareholder Value: The Case for Applying Fiduciary Law to Corporate Political Donations Post-Citizens United .” Boston College Law Review 53 (2): 737774.
RosenbergLisa. 2012. “What You Should Know about the DICLOSE Act Part 1: What is the DISCLOSE Act?” Sunlight Foundation, 12 July, https://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2012/07/12/what-you-should-know-about-the-disclose-act-part-1-what-is-the-disclose-act/ (accessed 10 May 2015).
SantanaArthur D. 2014. “Virtuous or Vitriolic: The Effect of Anonymity on Civility in Online Newspaper Reader Comment Boards.” Journalism Practice 8 (1): 1833.
SchattschneiderE.E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
ShapiroMichael A. and Rieger Robert H.. 1992. “Comparing Positive and Negative Political Advertising on Radio.” Journalism and Mass Communication 69 (1): 135145.
ShenFuyuan and Wu H. Denis. 2002. “Effects of Soft-money Issue Advertisements on Candidate Evaluation and Voting Preference: An Exploration.” Mass Communication and Society 5 (4): 395410.
SkaperdasStergios and Grofman Bernard. 1995. “Modeling Negative Campaigning.” American Political Science Review 89 (1): 4961.
StratmannThomas. 2006. “Is Spending More Potent for or Against a Proposition? Evidence from Ballot Measures.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 788801.
The Washington Post, 5 January 2014. “Koch-backed Political Network, Built to Shield Donors, Raised $400 Million in 2012,” Matea Gold. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/koch-backed-political-network-built-to-shield-donors-raised-400-million-in-2012-elections/2014/01/05/9e7cfd9a-719b-11e3-9389-09ef9944065e_story.html (accessed 1 July 2014).
TheilmannJohn and Wilhite Allen. 1998. “Campaign Tactics and the Decision to Attack.” The Journal of Politics 60 (4): 10501062.
Torres-SpelliscyCiara. 2011. “Hiding Behind the Tax Code, the Dark Election of 2010 and Why Tax-exempt Entities Should be Subject to Robust Federal Campaign Finance Disclosure Laws.” Chapman's Journal of Law and Policy 16: 5997.
Torres-SpelliscyCiara and Fogel Kathy. 2012. “Shareholder-authorized Corporate Political Spending in the United Kingdom.” University of San Francisco Law Review 46: 525580.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business and Politics
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1469-3569
  • URL: /core/journals/business-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 15 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 196 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th April 2017 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.