Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

“Dark Money” and “Dirty Politics”: Are anonymous ads more negative?

Abstract
Abstract

Many scholars have studied the use of negative advertising in campaigns and what motivates candidates and groups to run negative ads. Recent elections, however, have seen a dramatic increase in advertising by outside groups, particularly by so-called “dark-money” organizations, which do not disclose their donor information. This study questions whether dark-money groups are more likely to engage in negative advertising. By examining the more than 13,000 outside-group expenditures from the 2010 through the 2014 congressional elections, it finds that outside groups are, indeed, more likely to use negative ads when they conceal their donor information. Additionally, while liberal and conservative groups are roughly equally likely to use negative ads, conservative groups are most likely to use anonymously funded negative advertisements. This could be, at least in part, due to the support conservative groups receive from organized businesses, which generally seek to conceal their political activities from public scrutiny.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Daniel E. Chand, Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Kent State University e-mail: dchand@kent.edu
Footnotes
Hide All

The author would like to thank graduate students Melanie Tellez and Paige Sharp for their help collecting data for this project and anonymous reviewers for their feedback on the manuscript. Anonymity is occasionally appropriate.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Gary J. Anders 1985. “Business Involvement in Campaign Finance: Factors Influencing the Decision to Form Corporate PAC.” PS: Political Science and Politics 18 (2): 213220.

Matthew Blackwell . 2013. “A Framework for Dynamic Causal Inference in Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 504519.

Deborah J. Brooks and Michael Murov . 2012. “Assessing Accountability in a Post-Citizens United Era: The Effects of Attack Ad Sponsorship by Unknown Independent Groups.” American Politics Research 40 (3): 383418.

Dick M. Carpenter II , David M. Primo , Pavel Tendetnik , and Sandy Ho . 2014. “Disclosing Disclosure: Lessons from ‘Failed’ Field Experiment.” The Forum 12 (2): 343356.

Conor Dowling and Amber Wichowsky . 2015. “Attack without Consequence: Candidates, Parties, Groups and the Changing Face of Negative Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 1936.

Susan T. Fiske 1980. “Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 (6): 889906.

John C. Fortier and Michael J. Malbin . 2013. “An Agenda for Future Research on Money and Politics in the United States.” The Forum 11 (3): 455479.

Kim L. Fridkin and Patrick J. Kenney . 2004. “Do Negative Messages Work? The Impact of Negativity on Citizens’ Evaluations of Candidates.” American Politics Research 32 (5): 570605.

Gina M. Garramone 1984. “Voter Responses to Negative ads.” Journalism Quarterly 61 (2): 250259.

John G. Geer 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jack Glaser , Jay Dixit , and Donald P. Green . 2002. “Studying Hate Crime with the Internet: What Makes Racists Advocate Racial Violence?Journal of Social Issues 58 (1): 177193.

Wendy L. Hansen and Neil J. Mitchell . 2000. “Disaggregating and Explaining Corporate Political Activity: Domestic and Foreign Corporations in National Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (4): 891903.

Richard R. Lau , Lee Sigelman , and Ivy Brown Rovner . 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 11761209.

Thomas P. Lyon and John W. Maxwell . 2004. “Astroturf: Interest Group Lobbying and Corporate Strategy.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 13 (4): 561–97.

Carolyn Nielsen . 2013. “Coproduction or Cohabitation: Are Anonymous Online Comments on Newspaper Websites Shaping News Content?New Media and Society 16 (3): 470487.

Arthur D. Santana 2014. “Virtuous or Vitriolic: The Effect of Anonymity on Civility in Online Newspaper Reader Comment Boards.” Journalism Practice 8 (1): 1833.

Michael A. Shapiro and Robert H. Rieger . 1992. “Comparing Positive and Negative Political Advertising on Radio.” Journalism and Mass Communication 69 (1): 135145.

Fuyuan Shen and H. Denis Wu . 2002. “Effects of Soft-money Issue Advertisements on Candidate Evaluation and Voting Preference: An Exploration.” Mass Communication and Society 5 (4): 395410.

Thomas Stratmann . 2006. “Is Spending More Potent for or Against a Proposition? Evidence from Ballot Measures.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 788801.

John Theilmann and Allen Wilhite . 1998. “Campaign Tactics and the Decision to Attack.” The Journal of Politics 60 (4): 10501062.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business and Politics
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1469-3569
  • URL: /core/journals/business-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 171 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th April 2017 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.