Skip to main content Accessibility help

An Investigation of Social Influence: Explaining the Effect of Group Discussion on Consensus in Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning

  • Linda Thorne, Dawn W. Massey and Joanne Jones


This study introduces Moscovici’s (1976, 1985) model of social influence to the accounting research domain, and uses an experiment to assess whether his theory explains how different types of discussion affects consensus in auditors’ ethical reasoning. Moscovici’s theory proposes three modalities of influence to describe how consensus is achieved following discussion: conformity, innovation, and normalization. Conformity describes the situation where individuals in the minority (e.g., auditors that do not accept the dominant view) accede to the majority (e.g., auditors that hold the dominant view) as a result of group discussion. Innovation describes the situation where individuals in the majority accede to the minority. Normalization describes the situation where there is reciprocal influence.

We find that conformity occurs when auditors are asked to prescriptively discuss what ideally “should” be the resolution to an ethical dilemma. Normalization occurs when auditors are asked to deliberatively discuss what realistically would be the resolution to an ethical dilemma. The results of this study suggest that prescriptive discussion of an ethical dilemma encourages auditor groups to strive to find the best response to a moral dilemma if it is represented by the majority view. In contrast, deliberative discussion of an ethical dilemma may encourage the elimination of multiple viewpoints. The results of this study have important implications for understanding the social influence process that affects auditors’ ethical reasoning.



Hide All
Abdel-khalik, A., Snowball, D., and Wragge, D.. 1983. “The Effects of Certain Internal Audit Variables on the Planning of External Audit Programs.” The Accounting Review: 2 1527.
Arnold, D., Bernardi, R., and Neidermeyer, P.. 1999. “The Effect of Independence on Decisions Concerning Additional Audit Work: A European Perspective.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18:4567.
Arnold, V., Sutton, S., Hayne, S., and Smith, C.. 2000. “Group Decision-Making: The Impact of Opportunity Cost, Time Pressure and Group Support Systems.” Behavioral Research in Accounting: 6996.
Asch, S. 1951. “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgements.” In Groups, Leadership and Men, ed. Guetzkow, H.. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press, 17790.
Asch, S.. 1955. “Opinions and Social Pressure.” Scientific American 193: 315.
Asch, S.. 1956. “Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority.” Psychological Monographs 70(9).
Ashton, A. 1985. “Does Consensus Imply Accuracy in Accounting Studies of Decision-Making?” Accounting Review 67: 17385.
Bamber, E., Watson, R., and Hill, M.. 1996. “The Effects of Group Support System Technology on Audit Group Decision-Making.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Spring): 12234.
Barnlund, D. 1959. “A Comparative Study of Individual, Majority, and Group Judgment.” Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 58 (January): 5560.
Bernardi, R., and Arnold, D.. 1997. “An Examination of Moral Development within Public Accounting by Gender, Staff Level, and Firm.” Contemporary Accounting Research 14: 65368.
Clark III, R. 1999. “Effect of Number of Majority Defectors on Minority Influence.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice 3(4): 30312.
Davison, M., and Robbins, S.. 1989. “The Reliability and Validity of Objective Indices of Moral Development.” Applied Psychological Measurement 2(3): 391403.
Einhorn, J. 1974. “Expert Judgment: Some Necessary Conditions and an Example.” Journal of Applied Psychology 59: 56271.
Erb, H., Bohner, G., Rank, S., and Einwiller, S.. 2002. “Processing Minority and Majority Communications: The Role of Conflict with Prior Attitudes.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 117282.
Francis, J. 1990. “After Virtue? Accounting as a Moral and Discursive Practice.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 3(3): 517.
Gaa, J. 1993. The Ethical Foundations of Public Accounting. Vancouver: CGA-Canada Research Foundation.
Gibbins, M., and Mason, A.. 1988. Professional Judgment in Financial Reporting. Toronto: CICA Research Study.
Higgins, A., Power, C., and Kohlberg, L.. 1984. “The Relationship of Moral Atmosphere to Judgments of Responsibility.” In Morality, Moral Behavior and Moral Development, ed. Kurtines, W. M. and Gerwirth, J. L.. New York: Wiley, 74106.
Jones, T. 1991. “Ethical Decision Making by Individual in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model.” Academy of Management Review 16(2): 36695.
Keasey, K., and Watson, R.. 1989. “Consensus and Accuracy in Accounting Studies of Decision-Making: A Note on a New Measure of Consensus.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 14(4): 33745.
Kohlberg, L. 1958. The Development of Modes of Ethical Thinking and Choice in the Years Ten to Sixteen. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Chicago.
Lampe, J., and Finn, D.. 1992. “A Model of Auditors’ Moral Processes.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11 (Supplement): 3359.
Levine, J., and Russo, E.. 1987. “Majority and Minority Influence.” In Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Group Processes, vol. 8, ed. Hendrick, C.. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 1354.
Libby, R., and Lewis, B.. 1982. “Human Information Process Research in Accounting: The State of the Art in 1982.” Accounting, Organisations and Society 7(3): 23185.
Libby, T., and Thorne, L.. 2004. “The Identification and Categorization of Auditors’ Virtues.” Business Ethics Quarterly 14(3): 47998.
Lord, A., and DeZoort, F.. 2001. “The Impact of Commitment and Moral Reasoning on Auditors’ Responses to Social Influence Pressure.” Accounting, Organisations and Society 26(3): 21536.
Louwers, T., Ponemon, L., and Radtke, R.. 1997. “Examining Accountants’ Ethical Behaviour: A Review and Implications for Future Research.” In Behavioral Accounting Research: Foundations and Frontiers, ed. Arnold, V. and Sutton, S.. Sarasota, Fla.: American Accounting Association.
Maas, A., and Clark, R.. 1984. “Hidden Impacts of Minorities: Fifteen Years of Minority Influence Research.” Psychological Bulletin 95: 428540.
Massey, D. 2002. “The Importance of Context in Investigating Auditors’ Moral Abilities.” Research on Accounting Ethics 8: 195247.
Moscovici, S. 1976. Social Influence and Change. London: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S.. 1980. “Toward a Theory of Conversion Behaviour.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 13, ed. Berkowitz, L.. New York: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S.. 1985. “Social Influence and Conformity.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd edition, ed. Lindsey, G. and Aronson, E.. New York: Random House, 347412.
Moscovici, S., and Faucheux, C.. 1982. “Social Influence, Conformity Bias, and the Study of Active Minorities.” In Advances In Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 6, ed. Berkowitz, L.. New York: Academic Press.
Nemeth, C. 1985. “Compromising Public Influence for Private Change.” In Perspectives on Minority Influence, ed. Moscovici, S., Mugney, G., and Avermaet, E. Van. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7589.
Nemeth, C.. 1994. “The Value of Minority Dissent. In Minority Influence, ed. Moscovici, S.Mucchi-Faina, A., and Maas, A.. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 316.
Nemeth, C., and Chiles, C.. 1998. “Modeling Courage: The Role of Dissent in Fostering Independence.” European Journal of Social Psychology 18: 27580.
Nemeth, C., Rogers, J., and Brown, K.. 2001. “Devil’s Advocate vs. Authentic Dissent: Stimulating Quantity and Quality.” European Journal of Social Psychology 31: 70720.
Nemeth, C., and Wachter, J.. 1983. “Creative Problem Solving as a Result of Majority vs. Minority Influence.” European Journal of Social Psychology 7: 4555.
Perez, J., Mugny, G., Butera, F., Kaiser, C., and Roux, P.. 1994. “Integrating Minority and Majority Influence: Conversion, Consensus, and Uniformity.” In Minority Influence, ed. Moscovici, S., Mucchi-Faina, A., and Maas, A.. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 185208.
Pincus, K. 1990. “Audit Judgement Consensus: A Model for Dichotomous Decisions.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 9(2) (Spring).
Ponemon, L. 1990. “Ethical Judgments in Accounting: A Cognitive-Developmental Perspective.” Critical Perspectives in Accounting 1: 191215.
Ponemon, L.. 1992. “Accountant Underreporting and Moral Reasoning: An Experimental Lab Study.” Contemporary Accounting Research 9(1) (Fall): 17189.
Ponemon, L.. 1993. “The Influence of Ethical Reasoning on Auditors’ Perception of Management’s Integrity and Competence.” Advances in Accounting 11: 123.
Ponemon, L., and Gabhart, D.. 1993. Ethical Reasoning in Accounting and Auditing. Vancouver, B.C.: Canadian General Accountants’ Research Foundation.
Reckers, P., and Schultz, J.. 1982. “Individual versus Group Assisted Audit Evaluations.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 2 (Fall): 6474.
Rest, J. 1979. Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., and Thoma, S.. 1999. Post-Conventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Center for the Study of Ethical Development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rich, J., Solomon, I., and Trotman, K.. 1997. “Multi-Auditor Judgment/Decision Making Research: A Decade Later.” Journal of Accounting Literature 16: 86126.
Scharf, R. 1973. Moral Atmosphere and Intervention in the Prison. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Schultz, J., and Reckers, P.. 1981. “The Impact of Group Processing on Selected Audit Disclosure Decisions.” Journal of Accounting Research 19(2): 482501.
Sherif, M. 1935. “A Study of Some Human Factors in Perception. Archives of Psychology 22(187): 160.
Solomon, I. 1982. “Probability Assessment by Individual Auditors and Audit Teams: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Accounting Research 20 (1982): 689710.
Solomon, I.. 1987. “Multi-Auditor Judgment/Decision Making Research. Journal of Accounting Literature 6: 125.
Sweeney, J. 1995. “The Ethical Expertise of Accountants: An Exploratory Analysis.” Research in Accounting Ethics 1: 21334.
Thorne, L., 2000. “The Development of Two Measures to Assess Accountants’ Prescriptive and Deliberative Moral Reasoning.” Behavioral Research in Accounting 12: 13970.
Thorne, L., and Hartwick, J.. 2001. “The Directional Effects of Discussion on Auditors’ Moral Reasoning.” Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (Summer): 33761.
Wright, W. 1988. “Audit Judgment Consensus and Experience.” In Behavioral Accounting Research: A Critical Analysis, ed. Ferris, K. R.. New York: Publishing Horizons.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed