Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

The Conditions of Our Freedom: Foucault, Organization, and Ethics

  • Andrew Crane, David Knights and Ken Starkey
Abstract

The paper examines the contribution of the French philosopher Michel Foucault to the subject of ethics in organizations. The paper combines an analysis of Foucault’s work on discipline and control, with an examination of his later work on the ethical subject and technologies of the self. Our paper argues that the work of the later Foucault provides an important contribution to business ethics theory, practice and pedagogy. We discuss how it offers an alternative avenue to traditional normative ethical theory that both converges and diverges with other extant alternatives. By situating ethics as practices of the self, and by demonstrating the conditions under which freedom in organizations can be exercised, Foucault’s ethics attempt to connect an understanding and critique of power with a personal project of self. He therefore provides a theory of subjectivity that potentially informs a reshaping of contemporary virtue ethics theory, value-based management, and business ethics teaching.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Barsker, J. R., 1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 408–37.
Berlin, I., 1966. The two faces of power. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bernauer, J. W., & Rasmussen, D. (Eds.). 1994. The final Foucault. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Best, S., & Kellner, D. 1991. Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Burrell, G. 1988. Modernism, post-modernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2): 221–35.
Calàs, M. B., & Smircich, L., 1999. Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. The Academy of Management Review, 24: 649–71.
Cassell, C., Johnson, P., & Smith, K., 1997. Opening the black box: Corporate codes of ethics in their organizational context. Journal of Business Ethics, 16: 1077–93.
Chan, A., & Garrick, J., 2002. Organization theory in turbulent times: The traces of Foucault’s ethics. Organization, 9(4): 683701.
Chikudate, N., 2002. Collective myopia and disciplinary power behind the scenes of unethical practices: A diagnostic theory on Japanese organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3): 289307.
Cordner, C., 2004. Foucault and ethical universality. Inquiry, 47: 580–96.
Danaher, G., Schirato, T., & Webb, J., 2000. Understanding Foucault. London: Sage.
Deetz, S., 1992. Disciplinary power in the modern corporation. In Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H. (Eds.), Critical management studies: 2145. London: Sage.
Derrida, J., 1992. The gift of death, trans. David, Wills. Chicago: Univresity of Chicago Press.
Elliott, A., 2001. Concepts of the self. Cambridge: Polity.
Ethical Corporation. 2006. Special Report on CSR in Europe’s business schools. Ethical Corporation, May, www.ethicalcorp.com.
Ezzy, D., 1997. Subjectivity and the labour process: Conceptualising “good work.” Sociology 31(3): 427–44.
Feldman, S., 2002. Memory as a moral decision: The role of ethics in organizational culture. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Flyvberg, B., 1998. Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society? British Journal of Sociology, 49(2): 210–33.
Foucault, M., 1979a. Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Foucault, M.. 1979b. The history of sexuality, volume 1: The will to knowledge. Harmond-sworth: Penguin.
Foucault, M.. 1982. The subject and power. In Dreyfus, H. L. & Rabinow, P., Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brighton, Sussex Harvester Press, 208–26.
Foucault, M.. 1985a. The history of sexuality, volume 2: The use of pleasure. Harmond-sworth: Penguin.
Foucault, M.. 1985b. Sexuality and solitude. In Blonsky, M. (Ed.), On signs: A semiotics reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Foucault, M.. 1988a. The history of sexuality, volume 3: The care of the self. Harmonds-worth: Penguin.
Foucault, M.. 1988b. Technologies of the self. In Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault: 1649. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M.. 1988c. Truth, power, self: An interview with Michel Foucault, October 25, 1982. In Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault: 915. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M.. 1994. The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. In Bernauer, J. & Rasmussen, D. (Eds.), The Final Foucault. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Foucault, M.. 1997 Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. London: Allen Lane.
Ghoshal, S. 2003. Business schools share the blame for Enron. Financial Times, July 18, 2003.
Ghoshal, S.. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(3): 7591.
Habermas, J., 1987. Some questions concerning the theory of power: Foucault again. The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures (Lawrence, F., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J.. 1990. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J.. 1994. Three normative models of democracy. Constellations, 1(3): 110.
Hiley, D. R., 1987. Power and values in corporate life. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(5): 343–53.
Infinito, J., 2003. Jane Elliot meets Foucault: The formation of ethical identities in the classroom. Journal of Moral Education, 32(3): 6776.
Jermier, J. M., Knights, D., & Nord, W. R. (Eds). 1994. Resistance and power in organizations. London: Routledge
Jones, C., 2003. As if business ethics were possible, “within such limits.” Organization, 10(2): 223.
Kelemen, M., & Peltonen, T., 2001. Ethics, morality and the subject: The contribution of Zygmunt Bauman and Michel Foucault to “postmodern” business ethics. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17(2): 151–66.
Knights, D., 1992. Changing spaces: The disruptive power of epistemological location for the management and organisational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 17(3): 514–36.
Knights, D.. 2002. Writing organization analysis into Foucault. Organization, 9(4): 575–93.
Knights, D., & Collinson, D., 1987. Disciplining the shopfloor: A comparison of the disciplinary effects of managerial psychology and financial accounting. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 12(5): 457–77.
Knights, D., & McCabe, D., 2003 Organization and innovation: Guru schemes and American dreams. Milton Keynes: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
Knights, D., & Willmott, H., 1989. Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 23(4): 535–58.
Kolodny, N., 1996. The ethics of cryptonormativism: A defense of Foucault’s evasions. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 22(5): 6384.
Kuna, M., 2005. Macintyre on tradition, rationality, and relativism. Res Publica, 11(3): 251–73.
MacIntyre, A., 1984. After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Maclagan, P., 2007. Hierarchical control or individuals’ moral autonomy? Addressing a fundamental tension in the management of business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3): 4861.
Markula, P. 2003. The technologies of the self: Sport, feminism, and Foucault. Sociology of Sport Journal, 20(2): 87107.
Marshall, J. D., 1996. Michel Foucault: Personal autonomy and education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McKinlay, A., & Starkey, K., 1998. Foucault, management, and organization theory. London: Sage.
Moore, G., 2002. On the implications of the practice-institution distinction: MacIntyre and the application of modern virtue ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12: 1932.
Moore, G. 2005. Humanizing business: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15: 237–55.
Nehamas, A., 1998 The art of living. Socratic reflections from Plato to Foucault. Berekeley: University of California Press.
Nietzsche, F., 1975. Beyond good and evil, trans. Hollingdale, R. J.. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.
Nussbaum, M., 1997 Cultivating humanity. A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Paine, L. S., 1994. Managing for organizational Integrity. Harvard Business Review (March–April): 106–17.
Paras, E., 2006. Foucault 2.0: Beyond power and knowledge. New York: Other Press.
Peter, E., Lunardi, V. L., & Macfarlane, A., 2004. Nursing resistance as ethical action: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46: 403–16.
Posner, R. A., 2001. Public intellectuals: A study of decline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Prado, C. G., 2000. Starting with Foucault: An introduction to genealogy (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Probyn, E., 1999. Beyond food sex: Eating and an ethics of existence. Theory Culture & Society, 16(2): 215.
Rabinow, P., (Ed.). 1984. The Foucault reader. Harmonsdsworth: Penguin.
Rabinow, P.. 1997. Introduction: The history of systems of thought. In Foucault, M., Ethics: Subjectivity and truth, ed. Rabinow, P.. London: Allen Lane.
Rajchman, J., 1991. Truth and eros: Foucault, Lacan, and the search for ethics. London: Routledge.
Ransom, J. S., 1997 Foucault’s discipline. The politics of subjectivity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Rorty, R., 2006. Is philosophy relevant to applied ethics? Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 369–80.
Rosenthal, S. B., & Buchholz, R. A., 2000. Rethinking business ethics: A pragmatic approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Roth, J. 1992. Of what help is he? A review of “Foucault and Education” [Book Review]. American Educational Research Journal, 29(4): 683–94.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G., 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32: forthcoming.
Schwartz, B., 1986. The battle for human nature. New York: Norton and Co.
Schwartz, M., 2000. Why ethical codes constitute an unconscionable regression. Journal of Business Ethics, 23: 173–84.
Sewell, G., 1998. The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2): 397427.
Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B., 1992. Someone to watch over me: Surveillance, discipline and the JIT labour process. Sociology 26(2): 271–89.
Sinclair, A., 1993. Approaches to organizational culture and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 12: 6373.
Sosteric, M., 1996. Subjectivity and the labour process: A case study in the restaurant industry. Work, Employment and Society, 10(2): 297318.
Stansbury, J., & Barry, B., 2007. Ethics programs and the paradox of control. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17: 239–61.
Starkey, K., 1998. Durkheim and the limits of corporate culture: Whose culture? Which Durkheim? Journal of Management Studies, 35(2): 125–36.
Starkey, K., & Tiratsoo, N., 2007. The business school and the bottom line. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Styhre, A., 2001. Kaizen, ethics, and care of the operations: Management after empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6): 795810.
Sybylla, R. 2001. Hearing whose voice? The ethics of care and the practices of liberty: A critique. Economy and Society, 30(3): 6684.
Thompson, P., & Ackroyd, S., 1995. All quiet on the workplace front? A critique of recent trends in British industrial sociology. Sociology, 29(4): 615–33.
Townley, B., 1993. Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18: 518–45.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., Gibson, D. G., & Toffler, B. L., 1999. Managing ethics and legal compliance: What works and what hurts. California Management Review, 41(2): 131–51.
Vandekerckhove, W., & Commers, M. S. R., 2003. Downward workplace mobbing: A sign of the times? Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3): 4150.
Wain, K., 1996. Foucault, education, the self and modernity. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 30(3): 345–60.
Weaver, G. R., & Treviño, L. K., 1999. Compliance and values oriented ethics programs: Influences on employees’ attitudes and behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9: 315–35.
Werhane, P. H., 1998. Moral imagination and the search for ethical decision-making in management. Business Ethics Quarterly, Ruffin Series, 1: 7598.
Werhane, P. H., & Gorman, M., 2005. Intellectual property rights, moral imagination, and access to life-enhancing drugs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15: 595613.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed