Skip to main content Accessibility help

Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder Theory

  • Bradley R. Agle, Thomas Donaldson, R. Edward Freeman, Michael C. Jensen, Ronald K. Mitchell and Donna J. Wood...


A quick look at what is happening in the corporate world makes it clear that the stakeholder idea is alive, well, and flourishing; and the question now is not “if ” but “how” stakeholder theory will meet the challenges of its success. Does stakeholder theory’s “arrival” mean continued dynamism, refinement, and relevance, or stasis? How will superior stakeholder theory continue to develop? In light of these and related questions, the authors of these essays conducted an ongoing dialogue on the current state and future of stakeholder thinking. Beginning with a review of research and theory that has developed since the major stakeholder theorizing efforts of the 1990s, the authors individually offer their perspectives on the key issues relevant today to stakeholder thinking, and to suggest possible approaches that might lead toward and enable the continuing development of superior stakeholder theory.



Hide All
Abdel-Magid, M. 1979. General-price-level-adjusted historical-cost statements and The Ratio-Scale view: A comment. The Accounting Review, 54 (4): 825–29.
Agle, B., & Agle, L. 2007. The stated objectives of the Fortune 500: Examining the philosophical approaches that drive America’s largest firms. Working Paper. University of Pittsburgh.
Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5) 507–25.
Alchain, A. A., & Demsetz, H. 1972. Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62: 777–95.
Arrow, K.J. 1984. Individual choice under certainty and uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Arthur, A. 1993. Critical accounting theory and practical philosophy: Applying the tools. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 4 (3): 209–24.
Arthur, B. 1996. Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Business Review (July/August): 100–09.
Bartkus, B., Glassman, M., & McAfee, B. 2006. Mission statement quality and financial performance. European Management Journal, 24 (2): 8694.
Berman, S., Wicks, A., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 42 (5): 488506.
Briloff, A. J. 1990. Accountancy and society: A covenant desecrated. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 1 (2): 530.
Bryer, R. A. 1999. A Marxist critique of the FASB’s conceptual framework. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 10 (5): 551–89.
Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4: 497505.
Chan, D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (2): 234–46.
Clarkson, M. B. E. 1998. Introduction. In Clarkson, M. B. E. (Ed.), The Corporation and its stakeholders—Classic and contemporary readings : 19. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Cludts, S. 1999. The stakeholders as investors: A response to Etzioni. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9 (4):673–76.
Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. In Stigler, G. J. & Boulding, K.E. (Eds.), Readings in Price Theory: 386405. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Collins, J., & Porras, J. 1994. Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: HarperCollins.
Cooper, C., Taylor, P., Smith, N., & Catchpowle, L. 2005. A discussion of the political potential of social accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16 (7): 951–74.
Donaldson, T.. 1982. Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Donaldson, T.. 1999. Response: Making stakeholder theory whole. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 237–41.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. 1999. Ties that bind. Boston: HBS Press.
Duncan, R., & Pollard, S. 2001. A conceptual framework for a country poverty reduction strategy. Paper presented at The Asia and Pacific Forum on Poverty: Reforming policies and institutions for poverty reduction, Manila.
Egidi, M., & Marris, R. 1995. Economics, bounded rationality and the cognitive revolution. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.
Ehrenreich, B. 2001. Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Frederick, W. C. 1994. From CSR1 to CSR2. Business & Society 33 (2): 150–64.
Frederick, W. C.. 2006. Corporation be good!: The story of corporate social responsibility. Indianapolis: Dog Ear Publishing.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A., & Parmar, B. 2004. Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisitedOrganization Science 15 (3): 364–69.
Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2):191205.
Gallhofer, S., & Haslam, J., 1997. Beyond accounting: The possibilities of accounting and “critical” accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8 (1–2): 7195.
Goodsell, C. T. 1983. The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
Gray, R. 1998. Imagination, a bowl of petunias and social accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 9 (2): 205–16.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. 1991. Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hall, J., & Vrendenberg, H. 2005. Managing stakeholder ambiguity: Companies increasingly need to engage a wide range of stakeholders, but managers often underestimate the complexity of the task. Sloan Management Review, 47 (2):1119.
Heath, J. 2006. Business ethics without stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16 (4): 533–57.
Hendry, J. 2001. Missing the target: Normative stakeholder theory and the corporate governance debate. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11 (2):159–76.
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125–39.
Hofstadter, R. 1944. Social Darwinism in American thought, 1860–1915. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hugo, V. 1982 (1862). Les miserables. Middlesex, Eng.: Penguin Books, Ltd.
Jawahar, L. M., & McLaughlin, G. L. 2001. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26 (3): 397414.
Jensen, Michael C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (2): 235–47.
Jones, T., & Wicks, A. 1999. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 206–21.
Jönsson, S. 1994. Changing accounting regulatory structures in the context of a strong state. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 5 (4): 341–60.
Kaghan, W. N., & Bowker, G. C. 2004. Accounting practices and networks of accountancy: A comment on “what is measured counts” by Kala Saravanamuthu. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15 (3): 325–29.
Kochan, T. A., & Rubenstein, S. A. 2000. Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organization Science, 11 (4): 367–86.
Lakoff, G. 1996. Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. 2002. Business citizenship: From domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2): 155–88.
Lucas, R. E. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (2): 342.
Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. 1999. Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5): 553–63.
Marcoux, A. 2003. A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2): 124.
Marens, R., & Wicks, A. 1999. Getting real: Stakeholder theory, managerial practice, and the general irrelevance of fiduciary duties owed to shareholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9 (2): 273–93.
Marsden, R. 1998. A political technology of the body: How labour is organized into a productive force. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 9 (2): 99136.
Mill, J. S. 1848. Of production on a large, and production on a small scale. In Robson, J. S. (Ed.), Principles of Political Economy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Mitchell, R. K. 1976. Classification theory. Unpublished working paper. University of Calgary.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4): 853–86.
Mitnick, B. M. 1980. The political economy of regulation: Creating, designing, and removing regulatory forms. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mitnick, B. M.. 1981. The strategic uses of regulation—and deregulation. Business Horizons, 24 (2): 7183.
Moneva, J., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., & Munoz-Torres, M. J. 2007. The corporate stakeholder commitment and social and financial performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 107 (2): 84102.
Neu, D., & Ocampo, E. 2007. Doing missionary work: The World Bank and the diffusion of financial practices. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18 (3): 363–89.
Ogden, S., & Watson, R. 1999. Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5): 526–38.
Ogg, D. 1961. Europe in the seventeenth century,8th ed. London: A. & C. Black.
Omran, M., Atrill, P., & Pointon, J. 2002. Shareholders versus stakeholders: Corporate mission statements and investor returns. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11 (4): 318–26.
Pacioli, L. 1494. Summa de arithmetica, geometrica, proportioni etproportionalita. Venice.
Pajunen, K. 2006. Stakeholder influences in organizational survival. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (6): 1261–88.
Palmer, D. 1999. Upping the stakes: A response to John Hasnas on the normative viability of the stockholder and stakeholder theories. Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (4): 699706.
Pesqueux, Y. 2005. Corporate governance and accounting systems: A critical perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16 (6): 797873.
Phillips, K. 2006. American theocracy : The peril and politics of radical religion, oil, and borrowed money in the 21st century. New York: Viking.
Phillips, R. 2003. Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Kohler.
Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. 2003. What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13 (4): 479502.
Post, J., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. 2002. Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Romer, P. M. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5):1002–37.
Romer, P. M.. 1990. Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): S71S101.
Richards, I. 2004. Stakeholders versus shareholders: Journalism, business, and ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 19 (2): 119–29.
Rousseau, D. M. 1985. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior. 7: 137.
Schneider, M. 2002. A stakeholder model of organizational leadership. Organization Science, 13 (2): 209–20.
Scott, S., & Lane, V. 2000. A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25 (2): 4362.
Sen, A. 1985. The moral standing of the market. Social Philosophy & Policy, 2 (2): 119.
Sen, A.. 1987. On ethics and economics. Oxford : B. Blackwell.
Sen, A.. 1997. On economic inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Dublin: Whitestone.
Smith, H. J. 2003. The shareholders versus stakeholders debate. Sloan Management Review, 44 (4): 8590.
Stone, A. 1982. Regulation and its alternatives. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Sundaram, A., & Inkpen, A. 2004. The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15 (3): 350–63.
Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. 1999. The stakeholder research tradition: Converging theorists—not converging theory. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 222–27.
Uchetelle, L. 2007. Encouraging more reality in economics. New York Times (January 6), accessed January 6, 2007, at
Van Buren, H. 2001. If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11 (3):481–99.
Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. 2005. Why stakeholder and stockholder theories are not necessarily contradictory: A Knightian insight. Journal of Business Ethics, 61: 249–62.
Venkataraman, S. 2002. Stakeholder value equilibration and the entrepreneurial process. In Freeman, R. E. & Venkataraman, S. (Eds.), Ethics and Entrepreneurship (The Ruffin Series No. 3): 4557. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.
Vickrey, D. W. 1979. General-price-level adjusted historical-costs statements and the ratio scale view. The Accounting Review, 54 (2): 3140.
Vilanova, L. 2007. Neither shareholder nor stakeholder management: What happens when firms are run for their short-term relevant stakeholder? European Management Journal, 25 (2): 146–62.
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. 1985. The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10: 758–69.
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.
Wolfe, R. A., & Putler, D. S. 2002. How tight are the ties that bind stakeholder groups? Organization Science, 13 (2): 6480.
Wood, D. J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16: 691718.
Wood, D. J., & Logsdon, J. M. 2002. Business citizenship: From individuals to organizations. In Freeman, R. E. & Venkataraman, S. (Eds.), Ethics and Entrepreneurship (The Ruffin Series No. 3): 5994. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.
Wood, D. J., Logsdon, J. M., Lewellyn, P. G., & Davenport, K. 2006. Global business citizenship: A transformative framework for ethics and sustainable capitalism. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder Theory

  • Bradley R. Agle, Thomas Donaldson, R. Edward Freeman, Michael C. Jensen, Ronald K. Mitchell and Donna J. Wood...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed