Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Problem of Unilateralism in Agency Theory: Towards a Bilateral Formulation

  • Sareh Pouryousefi (a1) and Jeff Frooman (a2)

Some business ethicists view agency theory as a cautionary tale—a proof that it is impossible to carry out successful economic interactions in the absence of ethical behaviour. The cautionary-tale view presents a nuanced normative characterisation of agency, but its unilateral focus betrays a limited understanding of the structure of social interaction. This article moves beyond unilateralism by presenting a descriptive and normative argument for a bilateral cautionary-tale view. Specifically, we discuss hat swaps and role dualism in asymmetric-information principal-agent relationships and argue that the norm of reciprocity can function as a moral solution to agency risks in adverse-selection and moral-hazard problems. Our bilateral cautionary-tale formulation extends the normative boundaries of agency theory, while leaving the fundamental economic assumptions of agency theory intact.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Bhattacharyya & F Lafontaine . 1995. Double-sided moral hazard and the nature of share contracts. RAND Journal of Economics, 26(4): 761781.

J. R Boatright . 2007. Is there an internal morality of contracting? Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 293295.

D. A. Bosse , R. A. Phillips , & J. S Harrison . 2009. Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 447456.

D. Bosse , & R Phillips . 2016. Agency theory and bounded self-interest. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 276297.

D Braybrooke . 1976. The insoluble problem of the social contract. Dialogue, 15: 337.

A Buchanan . 1996. Toward a theory of the ethics of bureaucratic organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(4): 419440.

J-J Chang , C-C Lai , & C-C Lin . 2003. Profit sharing, worker effort, and double-sided moral hazard in an efficiency wage model. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(1): 7593.

T Donaldson . 2012. The epistemic fault line corporate governance. Academy of Management Review, 37(2): 256271.

P. Dybvig , & N. A Lutz . 1993. Warranties, durability, and maintenance: Two-sided moral hazard in a continuous-time model. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3): 575597.

K. M Eisenhardt . 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 5774.

R. Elitzur , A. Gavious , & A. K Wensley . 2012. Information systems outsourcing projects as a double moral hazard problem. Omega, 40(3): 379389.

E. F Fama . 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88: 288307.

E. Fehr , & S Gächter . 2000. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14: 159181.

F. Ferraro , J. Pfeffer , & R. I Sutton . 2005. Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30: 824.

S Ghoshal . 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 7491.

S. Ghoshal , & P Moran . 1996. Bad For practice: A critique of transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1347.

O. Gürtler & M Kräkel . 2008. Double-sided moral hazard, efficiency wages, and litigation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 26(2): 337364.

D. M. Hausman , & M. S McPherson . 1996. Economic analysis and moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

J Heath . 1996. Rational choice as critical theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 22: 4362.

J Heath . 2006. Business ethics without stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(3): 533557.

J Heath . 2009. Uses and abuses of agency theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(4): 497528.

J Heath . 2013. The structure of intergenerational cooperation. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41(1): 3166.

A. K. Hoenen , & T Kostova . 2015. Utilizing the broader agency perspective for studying headquarters–Subsidiary relations in multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 104113.

B. W Husted . 2007. Agency, information, and the structure of moral problems in business. Organisation Studies, 28(2): 177195.

M. C. Jensen , & W. H Meckling . 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305360.

S. K. Kim , & S Wang . 1998. Linear contracts and double moral hazard. Journal of Economic Theory, 82: 342378.

B. W Kulik . 2005. Agency theory, reasoning and culture at Enron: In search of a solution. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4): 347360.

H McCormick . 2009. Intergenerational justice and the non-reciprocity problem. Political Studies, 57: 451458.

E Noreen . 1988. The economics of ethics: A new perspective on agency theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(4): 359369.

J. D Reid . 1977. The theory of share tenancy revisited – Again. Journal of Political Economy, 85(2): 403407.

R. E Romano . 1994. Double moral hazard and resale price maintenance. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(3): 455466.

P. H Rubin . 1978. The theory of the firms and the structure of the franchise contract. Journal of Law and Economics, 21: 223233.

S. H Seog . 2010. Double-sided adverse selection in the product market and the role of the insurance market. International Economic Review, 51(1): 125142.

A Sharma . 1997. Professional as agent: Knowledge asymmetry in agency exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22(3): 758798.

R. C Solomon . 1999. Game theory as a model for business and business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(1): 1130.

J. H. van Oosterhout , P. P. M. A. R. Heugens , & M Kaptein . 2006. The internal morality of contracting: Advancing the contractualist endeavor in business ethics. Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 521539.

J. P. Walsh , & J. K Steward . 1990. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15(3): 421458.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 32 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 300 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th February 2017 - 30th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.