Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 47
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kuokkanen, Henri and Sun, William 2016. Emotions and Organizational Governance.

    Campbell, David and Cowton, Christopher J. 2015. Method issues in business ethics research: finding credible answers to questions that matter. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 24, p. S3.

    Christensen, Anne L. and Woodland, Angela 2015. An Investigation of the Relationships Among Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) Participation and Ethical Judgment and Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics,

    Schütte, Larissa and Gregory-Smith, Diana 2015. Neutralisation and Mental Accounting in Ethical Consumption: The Case of Sustainable Holidays. Sustainability, Vol. 7, Issue. 6, p. 7959.

    Yam, Kai Chi 2015. The Effects of Thought Suppression on Ethical Decision Making: Mental Rebound Versus Ego Depletion. Journal of Business Ethics,

    Fitz, Nicholas S. Nadler, Roland Manogaran, Praveena Chong, Eugene W. J. and Reiner, Peter B. 2014. Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement. Neuroethics, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p. 173.

    Henssen, Bart Voordeckers, Wim Lambrechts, Frank and Koiranen, Matti 2014. The CEO autonomy–stewardship behavior relationship in family firms: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Journal of Family Business Strategy, Vol. 5, Issue. 3, p. 312.

    Kajzer, Mitchell D'Arcy, John Crowell, Charles R. Striegel, Aaron and Van Bruggen, Dirk 2014. An exploratory investigation of message-person congruence in information security awareness campaigns. Computers & Security, Vol. 43, p. 64.

    Rocco, Lorenzo Fumagalli, Elena and Suhrcke, Marc 2014. FROM SOCIAL CAPITAL TO HEALTH - AND BACK. Health Economics, Vol. 23, Issue. 5, p. 586.

    Windolph, Sarah Elena Harms, Dorli and Schaltegger, Stefan 2014. Motivations for Corporate Sustainability Management: Contrasting Survey Results and Implementation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 21, Issue. 5, p. 272.

    Wouters, Kristel Maesschalck, Jeroen Peeters, Carel F. W. and Roosen, Marijke 2014. Methodological Issues in the Design of Online Surveys for Measuring Unethical Work Behavior: Recommendations on the Basis of a Split-Ballot Experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 120, Issue. 2, p. 275.

    Bampton, Roberta and Cowton, Christopher J. 2013. Taking Stock of Accounting Ethics Scholarship: A Review of the Journal Literature. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 114, Issue. 3, p. 549.

    Baumann-Pauly, Dorothée and Scherer, Andreas Georg 2013. The Organizational Implementation of Corporate Citizenship: An Assessment Tool and its Application at UN Global Compact Participants. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 117, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Blanthorne, Cynthia Burton, Hughlene A. and Fisher, Dann 2013. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research.

    Avison, Lynn and Cowton, Christopher J. 2012. UK audit committees and the Revised Code. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 42.

    D'Arcy, John and Devaraj, Sarv 2012. Employee Misuse of Information Technology Resources: Testing a Contemporary Deterrence Model. Decision Sciences, Vol. 43, Issue. 6, p. 1091.

    Elm, Dawn R. and Radin, Tara J. 2012. Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different?. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 107, Issue. 3, p. 313.

    Schaltegger, Stefan Windolph, Sarah Elena and Herzig, Christian 2012. A longitudinal analysis of the knowledge and application of sustainability management tools in large German companies. Society and Economy, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 549.

    Sosik, John J. Gentry, William A. and Chun, Jae Uk 2012. The value of virtue in the upper echelons: A multisource examination of executive character strengths and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 367.

    Bay, Darlene and Nikitkov, Alexey 2011. Subjective probability assessments of the incidence of unethical behavior: the importance of scenario-respondent fit. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 1.


The Nature of Social Desirability Response Effects in Ethics Research


The study assesses how a social desirability (SD) bias influences the relationship between several independent and dependent variables commonly investigated in ethics research. The effect of a SD bias was observed when a questionnaire was administered under varying conditions of anonymity and with different measurement techniques for the SD construct. Findings reveal that a SD bias is present in the majority of relationships studied, and it most frequently plays a moderating role. While the measure of SD influences the strength and type of relationship, condition of anonymity has relatively little effect on the level of SD.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D.P. Crowne , and D. Marlowe : 1960, ‘A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology’, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349354.

A. Edwards : 1953, ‘The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 9093.

D.C. Ganster , H.W. Hennessey and F. Luthans : 1983, ‘Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models’, Academy of Management Journal, 26, No. 2, 321331.

W.R. Gove , and M.R. Geerken : 1977, ‘Response bias in surveys of mental health: An empirical examination’, American Journal of Sociology, 82, 12891317.

R.M. Groves : 1989, Survey errors and survey costs, New York: Wiley.

A.J. Nederhof : 1985, ‘Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263280.

D.L. Paulhus : 1984, ‘Two-component models of socially desirable responding’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598609.

D.M. Randall , and M.F. Fernandes : 1991, ‘The social desirability response bias in ethics research’, Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 1123.

D.M. Randall , and A.M. Gibson : 1990, ‘Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics, 9, No. 6 457479

J.B. Rotter : 1966, ‘Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement’, Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, Whole No. 609).

D.E. Stem Jr., and R.K. Steinhorst : 1984, ‘Telephone interview and mail questionnaire applications of the randomized response model’, Jo urnal of the American Statistical Association, 79, No. 387, 555564.

F. Wiseman : 1972, ‘Methodological bias in public opinion surveys’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 105108.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *