Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:39:45.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOSPITALITY NARRATIVES IN VIRGIL AND CALLIMACHUS: THE IDEOLOGY OF RECEPTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2017

Donncha O'Rourke
Donncha O'Rourke*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
*Donncha.ORourke@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article highlights the extent and significance of the intertextual relationship between reception narratives in Virgil's Aeneid (Aeneas and Evander) and Callimachus’ Aetia (Heracles and Molorcus) and Hecale (Theseus and Hecale). Encompassing Aeneas’ succession to Hercules as Evander's guest, his failed pledge to his host and his acquisition of a shield on which his historical successor, Augustus, is depicted, Callimachean intertextuality informs the narrative of the Aeneid in its widest sweep. As the archetypal scene of Homeric hospitality (Odysseus and Eumaeus) is received from Callimachus by the new Homer of Augustan Rome, the narrative of reception becomes one of intertextual and cultural appropriation, the dynamics of which are far from those of amicable exchange.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 63 , December 2017 , pp. 118 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Fragments of Aetia follow Harder unless otherwise stated; those of Hecale follow Hollis. This article has been much improved by the input from its anonymous reviewers and the editor at CCJ. For helpful discussion and/or response to earlier drafts, I also warmly thank Lilah Grace Canevaro, Fiachra Mac Góráin, Calum Maciver, Damien Nelis and Michiel Verheij.

References

Works cited

Acosta-Hughes, B. (2008) ‘Unwilling farewell and complex allusion (Sappho, Callimachus and Aeneid 6.458)’, Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 13, 1–11.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. (2012) Callimachus in context: from Plato to the Augustan poets, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ambühl, A. (2004) ‘Entertaining Theseus and Heracles: the Hecale and the Victoria Berenices as a diptych’, in Harder, A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus. Volume ii, Hellenistica Groningana 7, Leuven. 23–47.Google Scholar
Ambühl, A. (2005) Kinder und junge Helden: innovative Aspekte des Umgangs mit der literarischen Tradition bei Kallimachos, Hellenistica Groningana 9, Leuven.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2004) Kallimachos, Werke: griechisch und deutsch, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2011) ‘Dimensions of power: Callimachean geopoetics and the Ptolemaic Empire’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. (eds.), Brill's companion to Callimachus, Leiden and Boston, 155–77.Google Scholar
Barbantani, S. (2011) ‘Callimachus’ queens’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. (eds.), Brill's companion to Callimachus, Leiden and Boston, 201–24.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2011) ‘Roman Callimachus’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. (eds.), Brill's companion to Callimachus, Leiden and Boston, 511–33.Google Scholar
Benedetto, G. (2011) ‘Callimachus and the Atthidographers’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. (eds.), Brill's companion to Callimachus, Leiden and Boston, 349–67.Google Scholar
Binder, G. (1971) Aeneas und Augustus: Interpretationen zum 8. Buch der Aeneis, Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 38, Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1988) The well-read muse: present and past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic poets, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Bolchazy, L. J. (1977) Hospitality in early Rome: Livy's concept of its humanizing force, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bornmann, F. (1968) Callimachi Hymnus in Dianam, Florence.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1965) ‘Tibull ii 5 und die Aeneis ’, Philologus 109.1, 104–20.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2005) ‘Lavinia's blush (Virgil Aeneid 12.64–70)’, in Cairns, D. (ed.), Body language in the Greek and Roman worlds, Swansea, 195–213.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and his critics, Princeton, NJ and Chichester.Google Scholar
Camps, W. (1969) An introduction to Virgil's Aeneid, London.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (2006) ‘The making of the shield: inspiration and repression in the Aeneid ’, G&R 53.2, 185–204.Google Scholar
Clayman, D. (2014) Berenice II and the Golden Age of Ptolemaic Egypt, Oxford.Google Scholar
Conington, J. and Nettleship, H. (1875) P. Vergili Maronis opera: the works of Virgil. Volume iii 3, rev. 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (1998) Petronius the poet: verse and literary tradition in the Satyricon, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986) The rhetoric of imitation: genre and poetic memory in Virgil and other Latin poets, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Conti Bizzarro, F. (1979) ‘Elementi callimachei e teocritei in [Theoc.] xxv’, RAAN 54, 319–31.Google Scholar
D'Alessio, G. B. (1996) Callimaco. Aitia, Giambi e altri frammenti. Volume ii, Milan.Google Scholar
DeBrohun, J. (2003) Roman Propertius and the reinvention of elegy, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Drew, D. (1927) The allegory of the Aeneid, Oxford.Google Scholar
Eden, P. (1975) A commentary on Virgil: Aeneid viii, Mnemosyne suppl. vol. 35, Leiden.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (1992) ‘Homer and oral tradition: the type-scene’, Oral Tradition 7.2, 284–330.Google Scholar
Faber, R. (2000) ‘Vergil's “Shield of Aeneas” (Aeneid 8.617–731) and the Shield of Heracles ’, Mnemosyne 53.1, 49–57.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and innovation in Hellenistic poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the traditions of ancient epic: the art of allusion in literary history, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1997) ‘The Virgilian intertext’, in Martindale, C. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Virgil, Cambridge, 222–38.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2015) ‘Commento all'elegia ix ’, in Fedeli, P., Dimundo, R. and Ciccarelli, I., Properzio. Elegie, libro iv , Studia Classica et Mediaevalia 7, Nordhausen, 1102–1197.Google Scholar
Felber, H., Wiesehöfer, J. and Wagner-Hasel, B. (2006) ‘Hospitality’, in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H. (eds.), Brill's New Pauly, online edition: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1574-9347_bnp_e419230, accessed 7.1.2017.Google Scholar
Fernandelli, M. (2012) Catullo e la rinascita dell'epos. Dal carme 64 all'Eneide, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. J. (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos libri vii–viii , Oxford.Google Scholar
Fratantuono, L. M. and McOsker, M. F. (2010) ‘Camilla and Cydippe: a note on Aeneid 11, 581–582’, QUCC 96, 111–16.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, T. (1992) Die Auseinandersetzung mit den Chorlyrikern in de Epinikien des Kallimachos, Basel.Google Scholar
Fusi, A. (2016) ‘Un verso callimacheo di Virgilio (Aen. 8.685). Nuovi argomenti a favore di una congettura negletta’, Lexis 34, 217–48.Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (2009) Catullus, Malden, MA and Oxford.Google Scholar
George, E. (1974) Aeneid viii and the Aitia of Callimachus, Leiden.Google Scholar
Geymonat, M. (1993) ‘Callimachus at the end of Aeneas’ narration’, HSPh 95, 323–31.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (1999) ‘Aeneas as hospes in Vergil, Aeneid 1 and 4’, CQ 49.1, 184–202.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. (2004) ‘Ovid's Hecale: deconstructing Athens in the Metamorphoses ’, JRS 9, 47–72.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. (1965) Theocritus. Volume ii, 2nd edn, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gransden, K. (1976a) Virgil: Aeneid, book viii , Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gransden, K. (1976b) Review of George (1974), CR 26.2, 183–4.Google Scholar
Griffiths, F. T. (1979) Theocritus at court, Leiden.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (1981) Studies in the Hellenistic epyllion, Königstein.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (2012) ‘The Hecale and Hellenistic conceptions of short hexameter narratives’, in Bär, S. and Baumbach, M. (eds.), Brill's companion to Greek and Latin epyllion and its reception, Leiden and Boston, 221–44.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. (1992) ‘Athens and the Ptolemies’, Classical Antiquity 11.1, 68–90.Google Scholar
Harder, A. (2002) ‘Intertextuality in Callimachus’ Aetia ’, in Lehnus, L. and Montanari, F. (eds.), Callimaque. Sept exposés suivis de discussions, Fondation Hardt Entretiens sur l'Antiquité Classique 48, Geneva, 189–233.Google Scholar
Harder, A. (2003) ‘The invention of past, present and future in Callimachus’ Aetia ’, Hermes 131, 290–306.Google Scholar
Harder, A. (2012a) Callimachus: Aetia. Introduction, text, and translation, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harder, A. (2012b) Callimachus: Aetia. Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harder, A. (2014) ‘Spiders in the Greek wide web’, in Hunter, R., Rengakos, A. and Sistakou, E. (eds.), Hellenistic studies at a crossroads: exploring texts, contexts and metatexts, Trends in Classics 25, 259–71.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil's Aeneid: cosmos and imperium, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1998) Virgil, Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics No. 28, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harding, P. (2007) The story of Athens: the fragments of the local chronicles of Attika, London and New York.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1993) ‘A Roman Hecale: Ovid Fasti 3.661–74’, CQ 43, 455–7.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2007) Generic enrichment in Vergil and Horace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2013) Framing the ass: literary texture in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1977) ‘Zur Meropis: Herakles’ Löwenfell und Athenas zweite Haut’, ZPE 27, 69–75.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1987) The metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the self-conscious muse, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and intertext: dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (1970) Ovid: Metamorphoses, book viii , Oxford.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (1990) Callimachus: Hecale, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (2009) Callimachus: Hecale, rev. 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1975) Review of George (1974), JRS 65, 228–9.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1998) ‘Before and after epic: Theocritus (?), Idyll 25’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Genre in Hellenistic poetry, Hellenistica Groningana 3, Groningen, 115–32.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2006) The shadow of Callimachus: studies in the reception of Hellenistic poetry at Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1988) Hellenistic poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2006) Propertius: Elegies book iv , Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2013) Greek to Latin: frameworks and contexts for intertextuality, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1949) Atthis: the local chronicles of ancient Athens, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. (1993) ‘Virgil and the Euphrates’, AJPh 114.1, 115–21.Google Scholar
Knauer, G. (1964) Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis, Hypomnemata 7, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (2007) ‘Catullus and Callimachus’, in Skinner, M. B. (ed.), A companion to Catullus, Malden, MA, 151–71.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2000) ‘A pun in Virgil's Aeneid (4.492–93)?’, CPh 95.1, 74–6.Google Scholar
Krevans, N. (1986) ‘POxy 2258 B fr. 2: a scholion to Callimachus’ Victoria Berenices?’, ZPE 65, 37–8.Google Scholar
La Cerda, J. L. (1617) P. Virgilii Maronis Aeneidos libri sex posteriores argumentis explicationibus notis illustrati, Leiden.Google Scholar
Livrea, E. (1979) ‘Der Liller Kallimachos und die Mausefallen’, ZPE 34, 37–42.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P. (1983) Supplementum Hellenisticum, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Lowe, D. (2013) ‘Women scorned: a new stichometric allusion in the Aeneid ’, CQ 63.1, 442–5.Google Scholar
Lowe, D. (2014) ‘A stichometric allusion to Catullus 64 in the Culex ’, CQ 64.2, 862–5.Google Scholar
Massimilla, G. (2010) Aitia. Libro terzo e quarto, Biblioteca di Studi Antichi 92, Pisa.Google Scholar
McCarter, S. (2012) ‘The forging of a god: Venus, the Shield of Aeneas, and Callimachus's Hymn to Artemis ’, TAPhA 142.2, 355–81.Google Scholar
McKay, K. J. (1977) Review of George (1974), Mnemosyne 30.4, 446–7.Google Scholar
McNelis, C. (2003) ‘Mourning glory: Callimachus’ Hecale and heroic honors’, MD 50, 155–61.Google Scholar
Miller, J. H. (1977) ‘The critic as host’, Critical Inquiry 3.3, 439–47.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Y. (1989) ‘Aristaeus: Augustus: Berenice: Aeneas’, Mnemosyne 42, 97–101.Google Scholar
Nappa, C. J. (2004) ‘Callimachus’ Aetia and Aeneas’ Sicily’, CQ 54.2, 640–6.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. P. (2001) Vergil's Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, Leeds.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. P. (2004) ‘From didactic to epic: Georgics 2.458–3.48’, in Gale, M. R. (ed.), Latin epic and didactic poetry: genre, tradition and individuality, Swansea, 73–107.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. P. (2005) ‘Patterns of time in Vergil: the Aeneid and the Aetia of Callimachus’, in Schwindt, J. P. (ed.), La représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne / Zur Poetik der Zeit in augusteischer Dichtung, Heidelberg, 71–83.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1990) Death and the optimistic prophecy in Vergil's Aeneid, Princeton.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (2001) ‘Callimachean influences on Vergilian etymological wordplay’, CJ 96.4, 369–400.Google Scholar
Oliver, G. (2002) ‘Callimachus the poet and benefactor of the Athenians’, ZPE 140, 6–8.Google Scholar
Palmore, A. (2016) ‘Callimachus’ Victoria Berenices: a case study in elegiac epyllion’, Aitia 6, online at: http://aitia.revues.org/1438, accessed 7.1.2017.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. (1977) ‘Callimachus: Victoria Berenices ’, ZPE 25, 1–51.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1949) Callimachus. Volume i: Fragmenta, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pucci, J. (1998) The full-knowing reader: allusion and the power of the reader in the Western literary tradition, New Haven.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1988) ‘Virgil's Inferno’, MD 20/1, 165–202.Google Scholar
Quinn, K. (1970) Catullus: the poems, London and New York.Google Scholar
Reece, S. (1993) The stranger's welcome: oral theory and the aesthetics of the Homeric hospitality scene, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D. (2008) ‘Another Greek pun in the Aeneid ’, Mnemosyne 61.2, 300–2.Google Scholar
Rimmel, V. (2002) Petronius and the anatomy of fiction, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1991) ‘The unexpected guests: patterns of xenia in Callimachus’ Victoria Berenices and Petronius’ Satyricon ’, CQ 41.2, 403–13.Google Scholar
Ross, D. (2007) Virgil's Aeneid: a reader's guide, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. S. and Thomas, R. F. (1984) ‘Virgil and the Euphrates’, AJPh 105.3, 339.Google Scholar
Selden, D. L. (1998) ‘Alibis’, Classical Antiquity 17.2, 289–412.Google Scholar
Skempis, M. (2010) ‘Kleine Leute’ und grosse Helden in Homers Odyssee und Kallimachos’ Hekale, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1994) ‘Remembrance of a guest: Theseus in Callimachus’ Hecale and Catullus 64’, LCM 19.9/10, 147–8.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. (2002) ‘Egyptian Callimachus’, in Lehnus, L. and Montanari, F. (eds.), Callimaque. Sept exposés suivis de discussions, Fondation Hardt Entretiens sur l'Antiquité Classique 48, Geneva, 235–70.Google Scholar
Syndikus, H. (1990) Catull: eine Interpretation. Teil 2: Die grossen Gedichte (61–68), Impulse der Forschung Bd. 55, Dartmstadt.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2012) Virgil: Aeneid, book xii , Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982) Lands and peoples in Roman poetry: the ethnographical tradition, PCPhS suppl. vol. 7, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1983) ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices and Roman poetry’, CQ 33, 92–113.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. (1997) Catullus, rev. edn, Toronto and London.Google Scholar
Tissol, G. (1992) ‘An allusion to Callimachus’ Aetia 3 in Vergil's Aeneid 11’, HSPh 94, 263–8.Google Scholar
Tueller, M. A. (2000) ‘Well-read heroes: quoting the Aetia in Aeneid 8’, HSPh 100, 361–80.Google Scholar
Warden, J. (1982) ‘Epic into elegy: Propertius 4, 9, 70f.’, Hermes 110.2, 228–42.Google Scholar
Weber, C. (1983) ‘Two chronological contradictions in Catullus 64’, TAPhA 113, 263–71.Google Scholar
Weber, G. (1993). Dichtung und höfische Gesellschaft: die Rezeption von Zeitgeschichte am Hof der ersten drei Ptolemäer, Hermes Einzelschriften 62, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1972) The Aeneid of Virgil. Volume i: Books 1–6, London.Google Scholar
Wills, J. (1987) ‘Scyphus – a Homeric hapax in Virgil’, AJPh 108.3, 455–7.Google Scholar
Wills, J. (1998) ‘Divided allusion: Virgil and the Coma Berenices ’, HSCPh 98, 277–305.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, S. F. (1989) Public and private in Vergil's Aeneid, Amherst.Google Scholar
Wimmel, W. (1973) Hirtenkrieg und arkadisches Rom: Reduktionsmedien in Vergils Aeneis, Munich.Google Scholar