Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-gblv7 Total loading time: 0.912 Render date: 2022-05-18T14:01:40.770Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Introducing the Medical Ethics Bowl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2016


Although ethics is an essential component of undergraduate medical education, research suggests that current medical ethics curricula face considerable challenges in improving students’ ethical reasoning. This article discusses these challenges and introduces a promising new mode of graduate and professional ethics instruction for overcoming them. We begin by describing common ethics curricula, focusing in particular on established problems with current approaches. Next, we describe a novel method of ethics education and assessment for medical students that we have devised: the Medical Ethics Bowl (MEB). Finally, we suggest the pedagogical advantages of the MEB when compared to other ethics curricula.

Departments and Columns
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


1. Branch, W. Supporting the moral development of medical ethics students. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2000;15(7):503–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

2. Bryan, CS, Babelay, AM. Building character: A model for reflective practice. Academic Medicine 2009;84(9):1283–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Doukas, D, McCullough, L, Wear, S. Project to Rebalance and Integrate Medical Education (PRIME) investigators. Perspective: Medical education in medical ethics and humanities as the foundation for developing medical professionalism. Academic Medicine 2012;87(3):334–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

4. Millstone, M. Teaching medical ethics to meet the realities of a changing health care system. Bioethical Inquiry 2014;11:213–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

5. E.g., Eckles, R, Meslin, E, Gaffney, M, Heft, P. Medical ethics education: Where are we? Where should we be going? A review. Academic Medicine 2005;80:1143–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

6. Lehmann, L, Kasoff, W, Koch, P, Federman, D. A survey of medical ethics education at US and Canadian medical schools. Academic Medicine 2004;79(7): 682–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. See note 1, Branch 2000.

8. Goldie, J. The detrimental ethical shift towards cynicism: Can medical educators help prevent it? Medical Education 2004;38:232–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Baykara ZG, Demir SG, Yaman S. The effect of ethics training on students recognizing ethical violations and developing moral sensitivity. Nursing Ethics 2014:0969733014542673.

10. See note 1, Branch 2000.

11. Hébert, PC, Messlin, EM, Dunn, EV. Measuring the ethical sensitivity of medical students: A study at the University of Toronto. Journal of Medical Ethics 1992;18:142–7.Google Scholar

12. Patenaude, J, Niyonsenga, T, Farard, D. Changes in students’ moral development during medical school: A cohort study. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2003;168(7):840–4.Google ScholarPubMed

13. Self, D, Wolinsky, F, Baldwin, D. The effect of teaching medical ethics on medical students’ moral reasoning. Academic Medicine 1989;64:755–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

14. Landenson, RF. The educational significance of the ethics bowl. Teaching Ethics 2001;1:6378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Rothman, DJ. Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision-Making. New York: Basic Books; 1991.Google Scholar

16. See note 1, Branch 2000.

17. E.g.,Frasser C, McGuire AL, Erdman K, Nadalo D, Scott S, Waters V. The ethics workup: A case-based approach to ethical decision-making instruction. Journal of Physician Assistant Education 2007;18(1):34–41.

18. Goldie, J. Review of ethics curricula in undergraduate medical education. Medical Education 2000;34:108–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

19. Goldie J, Schwartz L, McConnachie A, Morrison J. The impact of modern medical curriculum on students’ proposed behaviour on meeting ethical dilemmas. Medical Education 2002;38:942–9.

20. Goldie, J, Schwartz, L, McConnachie, A, Morrison, J. Students’ attitudes and potential behaviour with regard to whistle blowing as they pass through a modern medical curriculum. Medical Education 2003;37:368–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

21. See note 8, Goldie 2004.

22. See note 19, Goldie et al. 2002.

23. See note 1, Branch 2000.

24. Newton, BW, Barber, L, Clardy, J, Cleveland, E, O’Sullivan, P. Is there hardening of the heart during medical school? Academic Medicine 2008;83(3):244–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

25. Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Academic Medicine 1994;69(11):861–71.

26. Perkins, H, Geppert, C, Hazuda, H. Challenges in teaching ethics in medical schools. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 2000;319(5):273–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

27. Christakis, DA, Feudtner, C. Ethics in a short white coat: The ethical dilemmas that medical students confront. Academic Medicine 1993;68(4):249–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28. Terndrup C. A student’s perspective on medical ethics education. Journal of Religion and Health 2013;52:1073–8.

29. Cordingley, L, Hyde, C, Peters, S, Vernon, B, Bundy, C. Undergraduate medical students’ exposure to clinical ethics: A challenge to the development of professional behaviours? Medical Education 2007;41(12):1202–9.Google ScholarPubMed

30. Howard, F, McKneally, MF, Upshur, RE, Levin, AV. The formal and informal surgical ethics curriculum: Views of resident and staff surgeons in Toronto. The American Journal of Surgery 2012;203(2):258–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

31. See note 14, Landenson 2001, at 63.

32. Cf. Borrego AM. Ethics bowls exercise students’ moral muscles. Chronicle of Higher Education 2004 Mar 5;50:A31.

33. See note 14, Landenson 2001, at 76.

34. See note 5, Eckles et al. 2005, at 1145–6.

35. Ryan, R, Deci, E. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2000;25:5467, at 55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

36. See note 35, Ryan, Deci 2000.

37. See note 1, Branch 2000, at 505.

38. Savulescu, J, Crisp, R, Fulford, KWM, Hope, T. Evaluating ethics competence in medical education. Journal of Medical Ethics 1999;25:367–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

39. See note 11, Hébert et al. 1992.

40. See note 20, Goldie et al. 2003.

41. See note 17, Frasser et al. 2007.

42. Akabayashi A, Slingsby BT, Kai I, Nishimura T, Yamagishi A. The development of a brief and objective method for evaluating moral sensitivity and reasoning in medical students. BMC Medical Ethics 2004;5(1):1.

43. See note 11, Hébert et al. 1992.

44. Cf. note 1, Branch 2000.

45. Kohlberg L. Essays in Moral Development, Vol. 2: The Psychology of Moral Development: Moral Stages, Their Nature and Validity. San Francisco: Harper & Row; 1984.

46. See note 12, Patenaude et al. 2003, at 843.

47. Cruz JA, Frey WJ. An effective strategy for integrating ethics across the curriculum in engineering: An abet 200 challenge. Science and Engineering Ethics 2003;9:543–68.

48. Collins, D. Creating environmental change through business ethics and society course. In: Swanton, F, ed. Advancing Bioethics Education. Charlotte: Information Age; 2008:241–63.Google Scholar

49. See note 48, Collins 2008.

Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Introducing the Medical Ethics Bowl
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Introducing the Medical Ethics Bowl
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Introducing the Medical Ethics Bowl
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *