Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T02:09:05.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Life cycle and behaviour of the aquatic firefly Luciola leii (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) from Mainland China1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Xinhua Fu
Affiliation:
Institute of Insect Resources, Department of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
Ohba Nobuyoshi
Affiliation:
OHBA Firefly Institute, 4-1-12-204 Maborikaigan, Yokosuka City, 239-0801 Japan
Fredric V. Vencl
Affiliation:
Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5245, United States of America; The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancon, Balboa, Panama
Chaoliang Lei*
Affiliation:
Institute of Insect Resources, Department of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
*
2Corresponding author (e-mail: ioir@mail.hzau.edu.cn).

Abstract

The aquatic larvae of the firefly Luciola leii Fu and Ballantyne occur on the substrate of rice fields and ditches in Hubei Province of central China. The behaviour and ecology of L. leii are described. We recorded L. leii larvae attacking four species of aquatic snails: Lymnaea stagnalis (L.) (Basommatophora: Lymnaeidae), Gyraulus convexiusculus (Hutton) (Basommatophora: Planorbidae), Radix auricularia (L.) (Lymnaeidae), and Bellamya purificata Heude (Mesogastropoda: Viviparidae). At dusk, flying males produced two types of advertising flashes. One type consisted of a train of 8 rapid, green flashes followed by 2–3 slow, prolonged flashes produced by patrolling males as a long-distance signal. The duration of flashes in the patrolling pattern was 530 ms and the interflash interval was 80 ms. The other type was a short-range signal consisting of a green glow, which was emitted by flying males that had located a female. Once a female had been located, the male landed and switched to a courting pattern. The male courtship pattern consisted of single flashes of about 400 ms duration, delivered every 1.8 s. Females produced single answering flashes of 910 ms duration, with a latency of approximately 630 ms after the male flash. Luciola leii was univoltine. Females oviposited 1 to 7 times (mean = 4.78). Females laid, on average, 187.19 eggs. The eggs hatched at 21.52 days. Eggs became luminescent 4 or 5 days before hatching. The larval stage had six instars. Mature larvae climbed onto land to construct pupal cells at the end of April of the next year. The pupal stage lasted, on average, 4.88 days. The imago lasted 10.13 days. No predators of larvae were observed. The spider Tetragnatha praedonia Koch (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) was frequently observed to capture adult male fireflies in its web.

Résumé

Les larves aquatiques de la luciole Luciola leii Fu et Ballantyne se retrouvent sur les substrats des rizières et des fossés dans la province de Hu-pei dans le centre de la Chine. Nous décrivons le comportement et l'écologie de L. leii. Nous avons observé les larves de L. leii attaquer quatre espèces de gastéropodes aquatiques, Lymnaea stagnalis (L.) (Basommatophora: Lymnaeidae), Gyraulus convexiusculus (Hutton) (Basommatophora: Planorbidae), Radix auricularia (L.) (Lymnaeidae) et Bellamya purificata Heude (Mesogastropoda: Viviparidae). Au crépuscule, les mâles en vol produisent deux types de signaux lumineux. Un premier type consiste en une séquence de 8 signaux verts et rapides, suivis de 2–3 signaux lents prolongés; c'est une signalisation à longue distance produite par les mâles en patrouille. La durée des signaux dans la signalisation de patrouille est de 530 ms et l'intervalle entre les signaux de 80 ms. Le second type est une signalisation de proximité qui consiste en une lueur verte émise par les mâles en vol qui ont découvert une femelle. Une fois la femelle repérée, le mâle se pose et initie un comportement de cour. Ce comportement du mâle consiste en l'émission à toutes les 1,8 s environ de signaux lumineux isolés d'une durée d'à peu près 400 ms. Les femelles émettent un seul signal d'une durée de 910 ms après une période de latence d'environ 630 ms en réponse aux signaux du mâle. Les femelles pondent 1 à 7 fois, pour une moyenne de 4,78 fois et elles déposent en moyenne 187,19 oeufs. Les oeufs éclosent après 21,52 jours. Ils deviennent luminescents 4 ou 5 jours avant l'éclosion. La vie larvaire comporte six stades. Les larves matures montent sur la terre ferme pour y construire leur cellule nymphale. Le stade nymphal dure en moyenne 4,88 jours et la vie adulte 10,13 jours. Nous n'avons observé aucun prédateur des larves. L'araignée Tetragnatha praedonia Koch (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) capture souvent des lucioles adultes mâles dans sa toile.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution No. 1130 from the Graduate Program in Ecology and Evolution at Stony Brook University.

References

Branham, M.A, and Greenfield, M.D. 1996. Flashing males win mate success. Nature (London), 381: 745746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, A.D., and Copeland, J. 1988. Flash competition in male Photinus macdermotti fireflies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22: 271276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, A.D., Copeland, J., Raderman, R., and Bulloch, A.G.M. 1976. Role of interflash intervals in a firefly courtship (Photinus macdermotti). Animal Behaviour, 24: 786792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S., and Chen, R. 1997. The rearing of the aquatic firefly Luciola ficta. The Journal of Yilan Science University, 14: 2532. [In Chinese.]Google Scholar
Chen, T.R. 1999. An ecological guide to Taiwanese fireflies. Field Image Press, Taipei. [In Chinese.]Google Scholar
Chen, T.R. 2003. The fireflies of Taiwan. Translation and photograph edited by Jeng, M.L.. Field Image Press, Taipei. [In Chinese.]Google Scholar
De Cock, R., and Matthysen, E. 1999. Aposematism and bioluminescence: experimental evidence from glow-worm larvae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Evolutionary Ecology, 13(7–8): 619639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cock, R., and Matthysen, E. 2003. Glow-worm larvae bioluminescence (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) operates as an aposematic signal upon toads (Bufo bufo). Behavioral Ecology, 14(1): 103108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domagala, P., and Ghiradella, H. 1984. Structure and function of the terminal abdominal appendages (pygypodia) of photurid firefly larvae. Biological Bulletin, 166: 299309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. 1991. Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in insects. Biological Review, 66: 1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisner, T., Goetz, M.A., Hill, D.E., Smedley, S.R., and Meinwald, J. 1997. Firefly “femmes fatales” acquire defensive steroids (lucibufagins) from their firefly prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 94(18): 97239728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, X.H., Ohba, N., Vencl, F.V., and Lei, C.L. 2005 a. Structure, behavior, and the life cycle of an aquatic firefly, Luciola substriata, in China. The Canadian Entomologist, 137(1): 8390.Google Scholar
Fu, X.H., Wang, Y.Y., Ohba, N., and Lei, C.L. 2005 b. The swimming behavior of the aquatic larvae of the firefly Luciola substriata (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 59(4): 501505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, X.H., and Ballantyne, L. 2006. Luciola leii sp. nov., a new species of aquatic firefly (Coleoptera: Lampyridae: Luciolinae) from mainland China. The Canadian Entomologist, 138(3): 339347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, X.H., Ohba, N., Zhang, Y., and Lei, C.L. 2006. A rearing apparatus and diet for the aquatic firefly Luciola leii (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). The Canadian Entomologist, 138(3): 399406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, M.A, Meinwald, J., and Eisner, T. 1981. Lucibufagins. IV. New defensive steroids and a pterin from the firefly Photinus pyralis (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 37(7): 679680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, C.Z., and Chiang, B.H. 1997. Two firefly species with aquatic larvae in Taiwan. Conservation Quarterly, 17: 4246.Google Scholar
Jeng, M., Lai, J., and Yang, P. 1999. A synopsis of the firefly fauna at six national parks in Taiwan (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Chinese Journal of Entomology, 19: 6591.Google Scholar
Jeng, M.L., Lai, J., and Yang, P.S. 2003. Lampyridae: a synopsis of aquatic fireflies with description of a new species (Coleoptera). In Water beetles of China. Edited by Jäch, M.A. and Ji, L.. Vol. III. Zoologisch-Botanische Gesellschaft in terreich and wiener Coleopterologenverein. Vienna, Austria. pp. 539562.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, T. 1965. Ecological and biological studies on the West African firefly Luciola discicollis (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 58: 414426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lall, A.B., Seliger, H.H., Biggley, W.H., and Lloyd, J.E. 1980. Ecology of colors of firefly bio-luminescence. Science (Washington, D.C.), 210: 560562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, J.E. 1966. Studies on the flash communication system in Photinus fireflies. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Miscellaneous Publication, 130: 193.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J.E. 1972. Mating behavior of a New Guinea Luciola firefly: a new communication protocol (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 26: 155163.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J.E. 1979. Sexual selection in luminescent beetles. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Edited by Blum, M.S. and Blum, N.A.. Academic Press, New York. pp. 293342.Google Scholar
Makino, T., Suzuki, H., and Ohba, N. 1994. Computer analysis system for firefly flash patterns. Science Report of Yokosuka City Museum, 42: 2756.Google Scholar
McDermott, F.A. 1911. Some further observations on the light-emission of American Lampyridae: the photogenic function as a mating adaptation in the Photinini. The Canadian Entomologist, 43: 399406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohba, N. 1983. Studies on the communication system of Japanese fireflies. Science Report of Yokosuka City Museum, 3: 162.Google Scholar
Ohba, N. 2004. Flash communication systems of Japanese fireflies. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 44: 225233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohba, N., Azsuma, S., Nishiyama, K., Got, Y., Suzuki, H., and Kawashima, I. 1994. Morphology, life history and behavior of the firefly, Luciola owadai (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Science Report of Yokosuka City Museum, 41: 1526.Google Scholar
Okada, Y.K. 1928. Two Japanese aquatic glow-worms. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London (Part 2): 101107.Google Scholar
Sató, M., and Kimura, M. 1994. Discovery of a new firefly from the genus Luciola (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) from Kume Jima of the Rykyu Islands. Elytra, 22: 159162.Google Scholar
Underwood, T.J., Tallamy, D.W., and Fesek, J.D. 1997. Bioluminescence in firefly larvae: a test of the aposematic display hypothesis (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 10: 365370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vencl, F.V. 2004. Allometry and proximate mechanisms of sexual selection in Photinus fireflies, and some other beetles. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 44: 242249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vencl, F.V., and Carlson, A.D. 1998. Proximate mechanisms of sexual selection in the firefly Photinus pyralis (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 11(2): 191207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, S. 1999. The habitat management and food preference of an aquatic firefly, Luciola ficta (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). M.Sc. thesis, Graduate Institute of Plant Pathology and Entomology, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.Google Scholar