Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Impact of extrafloral nectar availability and plant genotype on ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) visitation to quaking aspen (Salicaceae)

  • Jonathon R. Newman (a1), Diane Wagner (a1) and Patricia Doak (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

For quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michaux; Salicaceae) the rate of extrafloral (EF) sugar secretion is increased by defoliation and decreased by drought. Although wholesale blocking of EF nectar has been shown to reduce ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) visitation to aspen, the effect of more subtle and realistic variations in nectar availability on ant recruitment is unknown. Working in Alaskan boreal forest (United States of America), we reduced and supplemented EF nectar availability on potted aspen ramets of three genotypes and surveyed visitation by free-living Formica fusca (Linnaeus) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ants were more responsive to a subtle increase in sugar availability than to a decrease. While nectar reduction had no effect on ant visitation, nectar supplementation increased ant visitation to one aspen genotype by 70% during an early summer trial. Average ant visitation to different aspen genotypes varied during the late summer, indicating that aspen genotype can influence attractiveness to ants. We conclude that natural induction of EF secretion in response to herbivory may benefit aspen through improved ant recruitment, though the response is dependent on aspen genotype and time of year. Differences among aspen genets in attractiveness to ants could influence the relative success of genotypes, especially in settings in which aspen regenerates from seed.

Copyright
Corresponding author
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: diane.wagner@alaska.edu).
Footnotes
Hide All

Subject editor: Justin Schmidt

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Apple J.L. and Feener D.H. 2001. Ant visitation of extrafloral nectaries of Passiflora: the effects of nectary attributes and ant behavior on patterns in facultative ant-plant mutualisms. Oecologia, 127: 409416.
Blüthgen N. and Feldhaar H. 2010. Food and shelter: how resources influence ant ecology. In Ant ecology. Edited by L. Lach, C.L. Parr, and K.L. Abbott. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. Pp. 115136.
Chamberlain S.A. and Holland J.N. 2008. Density-mediated, context-dependent consumer–resource interactions between ants and extrafloral nectar plants. Ecology, 89: 13641374. doi:10.1890/07-1139.1.
Chamberlain S.A. and Holland J.N. 2009. Quantitative synthesis of context dependency in ant-plant protection mutualisms. Ecology, 90: 23842392.
De Woody J., Rickman T.H., Jones B.E., and Hipkins V.D. 2009. Allozyme and microsatellite data reveal small clone size and high genetic diversity in aspen in the southern Cascade Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management, 258: 687696.
Doak P., Wagner D., and Watson A. 2007. Variable extrafloral nectary expression and its consequences in quaking aspen. Canadian Journal of Botany, 85: 19. doi:10.1139/B06-137.
Dussutour A. and Simpson S.J. 2008. Carbohydrate regulation in relation to colony growth in ants. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211: 22242232. doi:10.1242/jeb.017509.
Dussutour A. and Simpson S.J. 2009. Communal nutrition in ants. Current Biology, 19: 740744. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.015.
Eller A.S.D., de Gouw J., Graus M., and Monson R.K. 2012. Variation among different genotypes of hybrid poplar with regard to leaf volatile organic compound emissions. Ecological Applications, 22: 18651875.
Francoeur A. 1973. Révision taxonomique des espèces néarctiques du groupe fusca, genre Formica (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Mémoires de la Société Entomologique du Québec, 3: 1316.
Gonzalez-Teuber M. and Heil M. 2009. Nectar chemistry is tailored for both attraction of mutualists and protection from exploiters. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 4: 809813.
Heil M. 2004. Induction of two indirect defences benefits lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus, Fabaceae) in nature. Journal of Ecology, 92: 527536.
Heil M. 2008. Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytologist, 178: 4161.
Heil M. 2011. Nectar: generation, regulation and ecological functions. Trends in Plant Science, 16: 191200.
Jelinski D.E. and Cheliak W.M. 1992. Genetic diversity and spatial subdivision of Populus tremuloides Salicaceae) in a heterogeneous landscape. American Journal of Botany, 79: 728736.
Johnstone J.F., Hollingsworth T.N., Chapin F.S., and Mack M.C. 2010. Changes in fire regime break the legacy lock on successional trajectories in Alaskan boreal forest. Global Change Biology, 16: 12811295. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02051.x.
Katayama N. and Suzuki N. 2003. Changes in the use of extrafloral nectaries of Vicia faba (Leguminosae) and honeydew of aphids by ants with increasing aphid density. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 96: 579584.
Koptur S. 2005. Nectar as fuel for plant protectors. In Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its applications. Edited by F.L. Wackers and P.C.J. van Rijn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Pp. 75108.
Kost C. and Heil M. 2005. Increased availability of extrafloral nectar reduces herbivory in lima bean plants (Phaseolus lunatus, Fabaceae). Basic and Applied Ecology, 6: 237248.
Landhäusser S.M., Deshaies D., and Lieffers V.J. 2010. Disturbance facilitates rapid range expansion of aspen into higher elevations of the Rocky Mountains under a warming climate. Journal of Biogeography, 37: 6876. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02182.x.
Long J.N. and Mock K. 2012. Changing perspectives on regeneration ecology and genetic diversity in western quaking aspen: implications for silviculture. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42: 20112021. doi:10.1139/x2012-143.
Mortensen B., Wagner D., and Doak P. 2011. Defensive effects of extrafloral nectaries in quaking aspen differ with scale. Oecologia, 165: 983993. doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1799-6.
Mortensen B., Wagner D., and Doak P. 2013. Parental resource and offspring liability: the influence of extrafloral nectar on oviposition by a leaf-mining moth. Oecologia, 172: 767777. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2525-3.
Newman J. and Wagner D. 2013. The influence of defoliation and water availability on extrafloral nectar secretion in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx). Botany, 91: 761767.
Romme W.H., Turner M.G., Gardner R.H., Hargrove W.W., Tuskan G.A., Despain D.G., et al. 1997. A rare episode of sexual reproduction in aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx) following the 1988 Yellowstone fires. Natural Areas Journal, 17: 1725.
Rosumek F.B., Silveira F.A.O., Neves F.d.S., Barbosa N.P.d.U., Diniz L., Oki Y., et al. 2009. Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the roles of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia, 160: 537549.
Rudgers J.A. 2004. Enemies of herbivores can shape plant traits: selection in a facultative ant-plant mutualism. Ecology, 85: 192205.
Rudgers J.A. and Strauss S.Y. 2004. A selection mosaic in the facultative mutualism betweeen ants and wild cotton. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271: 24812488.
SAS Institute. 2008. SAS/STAT 9.2 user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.
Trager M.D., Smriti B., Hostetler J.A., Andrade G.V., Rodriguez-Cabal M.A., McKeon C.S., et al. 2010. Benefits for plants in ant-plant protective mutualisms: a meta-analysis. Public Library of Science One, 5: e14308. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014308.
Wagner D. and Doak P. 2013. Long term impact of a leaf miner outbreak on the performance of quaking aspen. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 43: 563568. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2012-0486.
Wooley S.C., Donaldson J.R., Gusse A.C., Lindroth R.L., and Stevens M.T. 2007. Extrafloral nectaries in aspen (Populus tremuloides): heritable genetic variation and herbivore-induced expression. Annals of Botany, 100: 13371346.
Yamawo A., Hada Y., and Suzuki N. 2012. Variations in direct and indirect defenses against herbivores on young plants of Mallotus japonicus in relation to soil moisture conditions. Journal of Plant Research, 125: 7176. doi:10.1007/s10265-011-0407-0.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Canadian Entomologist
  • ISSN: 0008-347X
  • EISSN: 1918-3240
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-entomologist
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 41 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 191 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.