Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T07:32:44.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(Z,E)-6,8-heneicosadien-11-one: major sex-pheromone component of Orgyia vetusta (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

R. Gries ,
P.W. Schaefer ,
H.J.S. Yoo ,
M. Greaves  and
G. Gries
R. Gries
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
P.W. Schaefer
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Laboratory, Newark, Delaware 19713, United States of America
H.J.S. Yoo
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-9610, United States of America
M. Greaves
Affiliation:
Box 247, Bodega Bay, California 94923, United States of America
G. Gries*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
*
3Corresponding author (e-mail: gries@sfu.ca).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The western tussock moth, Orgyia vetusta Boisduval (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), formerly known as Hemerocampa vetusta (Boisduval), occurs primarily in coastal areas of central California and south into Mexico, with occasional records east of the central Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys (Ferguson 1978). Two biotypes, feeding on perennial yellow bush lupine, Lupinus arboreus Sims (Fabaceae), or silver dune lupine, Lupinus chamissonis Eschsch. (this study), and on California live oak, Quercus agrifolia Née (Fagaceae), respectively, have been recognized and were originally considered two separate species (Edwards 1881; Ferguson 1978). Various fruit and nut trees have also been reported as host plants (Atkins 1958)

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 137 , Issue 4 , August 2005 , pp. 471 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arn, H., Städler, E., and Rauscher, S. 1975. The electroantennographic detector — a selective and sensitive tool in the gas chromatographic analysis of insect pheromones. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung Section C, Journal of Biosciences, 30: 722–725.Google Scholar
Atkins, E.L. Jr., 1958. The western tussock moth, Hemerocampa vetusta (Bdv.), on citrus in southern California. Journal of Economic Entomology, 51: 762–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, R.C. 1978. Biology of the insect. In The Douglas-fir tussock moth: a synthesis. Edited by Brookes, M.H., Stark, R.W., and Campbell, R.W.. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1585. pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
Bell, R.A., Owens, C.D., Shapiro, M., and Tardif, J.R. 1981. Mass rearing and virus production. In The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. Edited by Doane, C.C. and McManus, M.L.. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1584. pp. 599–655.Google Scholar
Bosik, J.J. 1997. Common names of insects and related organisms 1997. Entomological Society of America, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Edwards, H. 1881. Notes on the Pacific Coast species of Orgyia, with descriptions of larvae and new forms. Papilio, I: 60–62.Google Scholar
Ferguson, D.C. 1978. Noctuoidea, Lymantriidae. In The moths of America north of Mexico, including Greenland. Fascicle 22.2. E.W. Classey Ltd. and The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London.Google Scholar
Grant, G.G., Frech, D., and Grisdale, D. 1975. Tussock moths: pheromone cross stimulation, calling behavior, and effect of hybridization. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 68: 519–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, G.G., Slessor, K.N., Liu, W., and Abou-Zaid, M.M. 2003. (Z,Z)-6,9-Heneicosadien-11-one: labile sex pheromone of the whitemarked tussock moth, Orgyia leucostigma. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 29: 589–601.Google Scholar
Gray, T.G., Slessor, K.N., Shephard, R.F., Grant, G.G., and Manville, J.F. 1984. European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buolina (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): identification of additional pheromone components resulting in an improved lure. The Canadian Entomologist, 116: 1525–1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, G., McBrien, H.L., Gries, R., Li, J., Judd, G.J.R., Slessor, K.N. et al. 1993. (E4,E10)-dodecadienyl acetate: novel sex pheromone component of tentiform leafminer, Phyllonorycter mespilella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Gracillaridae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 19: 1789–1798.Google Scholar
Gries, G., Slessor, K.N., Gries, R., Khaskin, G., Wimalaratne, P.D.C., Gray, T.G. et al. 1997. (Z)- 6,(E)-8-heneicosadien-11-one: synergistic sex pheromone component of Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23: 19–34.Google Scholar
Gries, R., Khaskin, G., Gries, G., Bennett, R.G., King, G.G.S., Morewood, P. et al. 2002. (Z,Z)-4,7-tridecadien-(S)-2-yl acetate: sex pheromone of Douglas-fir cone gall midge, Contarinia oregonensis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28: 2283–2297.Google Scholar
Gries, R., Khaskin, G., Khaskin, E., Foltz, J., Schaefer, P.W., and Gries, G. 2003. Enantiomers of (Z,Z)-6,9-heneicosadien-11-ol: sex pheromone components of Orgyia detrita. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 29: 2201–2212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gries, R., Khaskin, G., Clearwater, J., Hasman, D., Schaefer, P.W., Khaskin, E. et al. 2005. (Z,Z)-6,9-heneicosadien-11-one: major sex pheromone component of painted apple moth, Teia anartoides. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 31: 603–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jury, J.C., Fielder, S., and Vigneswaran, M. 2003. Synthesis of 6Z,8E-heneicosadien-11-one, a sex pheromone of the painted apple moth, Teia anartoides. Tetrahedron Letters, 44: 27–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W. 1999. Semiochemistry of Orgyia and Diatraea Lepidopteran species and affinity labelling of 2,3-oxidosqualene cyclase. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS®. Version 6.03 [computer program]. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Smith, R.G., Daterman, G.E., and Daves, G.D. Jr., 1975. Douglas-fir tussock moth: sex pheromone identification and synthesis. Science (Washington, D.C.), 188: 63–64.Google Scholar
Van den Dool, H., and Kratz, P.D. 1963. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas–liquid partition chromatography. Journal of Chromatography, 2: 463–471.Google Scholar
Winter, W.D. Jr., 2000. Basic techniques for observing and studying moths and butterflies. Memoir No. 5. Lepidopterists' Society, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar