Skip to main content
×
×
Home

CJEM Debate Series: #Copayment – Medical insurance is for non-routine events

  • Geoffrey J. Hoffman (a1), Jerome R. Hoffman (a2), Michael Howlett (a3) and Paul Atkinson (a3)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      CJEM Debate Series: #Copayment – Medical insurance is for non-routine events
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      CJEM Debate Series: #Copayment – Medical insurance is for non-routine events
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      CJEM Debate Series: #Copayment – Medical insurance is for non-routine events
      Available formats
      ×
Abstract
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Correspondence to: Dr. Geoffrey J. Hoffman, Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls Street, Room 4352, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Email: gjh@umich.edu
References
Hide All
1. Brownlee, S, Chalkidou, K, Doust, J, et al. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet 2017;390(10090):156-168.
2. Glasziou, P, Straus, S, Brownlee, S, et al. Evidence for underuse of effective medical services around the world. Lancet 2017;390(10090):169-177.
3. Levinson, W, Kallewaard, M, Bhatia, RS, et al. “Choosing Wisely”: a growing international campaign. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24(2):167-174.
4. Hoffman, JR, Cooper, RJ. Overdiagnosis of disease: a modern epidemic. Arch Intern Med 2012;172(15):1123-1124.
5. Moynihan, R, Doust, J, Henry, D. Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy. BMJ 2012;344:e3502.
6. Wagner, J, Aron, DC. Incidentalomas: a “disease” of modern imaging technology. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;26(1):3-8.
7. Chandra, A, Gruber, J, McKnight, R. Patient cost-sharing and hospitalization offsets in the elderly. Am Econ Rev 2010;100(1):193-213.
8. Rosenthal, E. An American sickness: How healthcare became big business and how you can take it back. New York: Penguin Press; 2017.
9. Rice, T, Unruh, L. The economics of health reconsidered. 4th ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2015.
10. Laugesen, MJ, Glied, SA. Higher fees paid to US physicians drive higher spending for physician services compared to other countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30(9):1647-1656.
11. Anderson, GF, Reinhardt, UE, Hussey, PS, et al. It’s the prices, stupid: why the United States is so different from other countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22(3):89-105.
12. Fuchs, VR, Hahn, JS. How does Canada do it? A comparison of expenditures for physicians’ services in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med 1990;323(13):884-890.
13. Hillman, BJ, Olson, GT, Griffith, PE, et al. Physicians’ utilization and charges for outpatient diagnostic imaging in a Medicare population. JAMA 1992;268(15):2050-2054.
14. Levin, DC, Rao, VM. The effect of self-referral on utilization of advanced diagnostic imaging. Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(4):848-852.
15. Mitchell, JM, Scott, E. Physician ownership of physical therapy services. Effects on charges, utilization, profits, and service characteristics. JAMA 1992;268(15):2055-2059.
16. Swedlow, A, Johnson, G, Smithline, N, et al. Increased costs and rates of use in the California workers’ compensation system as a result of self-referral by physicians. N Engl J Med 1992;327(21):1502-1506.
17. MedPAC. Report to the Congress: improving incentives in the Medicare program: impact of physician self-referral on use of imaging services within an episode (chapter 4). Washington, DC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2009.
18. Hoffman, JR, Kanzaria, HK. Intolerance of error and culture of blame drive medical excess. BMJ 2014;349:g5702.
19. Kanzaria, HK, Hoffman, JR, Probst, MA, et al. Emergency physician perceptions of medically unnecessary advanced diagnostic imaging. Acad Emerg Med 2015;22(4):390-398.
20. Evans, R, Barer, ML. User fees for health care: why a bad idea keeps coming back (or, what’s health got to do with it?). Can J Aging 1995;14:360-385.
21. Evans, RG. Reform, re-form, and reaction in the Canadian health care system. Health Law J 2008;16:265-286.
22. Tamblyn, R, Laprise, R, Hanley, JA, et al. Adverse events associated with prescription drug cost-sharing among poor and elderly persons. JAMA 2001;285(4):421-429.
23. Hsu, J, Reed, M, Brand, R, et al. Cost-sharing: patient knowledge and effects on seeking emergency department care. Med Care 2004;42(3):290-296.
24. Reeder, CE, Nelson, AA. The differential impact of copayment on drug use in a Medicaid population. Inquiry 1985;22(4):396-403.
25. Stabile, M, N-Marandi, S. Fatal flaws: assessing Quebec’s failed health deductible proposal. C. D. Howe Institute Working Paper; 2010. Available at: http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/Working_Paper_Stabile.pdf.
26. RAND Health. The health insurance experiment – a classic RAND study speaks to the current health care reform debate; 2006. Available at: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/ research_briefs/2006/RAND_RB9174.pdf.
27. MacKinnon, J. “Health care reform from the cradle of Medicare”. Ottawa (ON): Macdonald-Laurier Institute; 2013.
28. Thomson, S, Osborn, R, Squires, D, et al. (eds.) International profiles of health care systems. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012.
29. CFHI. Myth: User fees ensure better use of health services by admin. Mythbusters; 2012. Available at: http://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/sf-docs/default-source/mythbusters/Myth_User_Fees_EN.pdf?sfvrsn=0.
30. Swartz, K. Cost-sharing: effects on spending and outcomes. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The Synthesis Project; 2010. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org.
31. Graham, J. Saskatchewan, Ottawa reach health funding deal. The Canadian Press; 2017. Available at: http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/saskatchewan-ottawa-reach-health-funding-deal-1.3245002.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1481-8035
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-emergency-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score