Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Comparison of tracheal intubation and alternative airway techniques performed in the prehospital setting by paramedics: a systematic review

  • Jan L. Jensen (a1) (a2), Ka Wai Cheung (a3), John M. Tallon (a1) and Andrew H. Travers (a4)
Abstract

This systematic review included controlled clinical trials comparing tracheal intubation (TI) with alternative airway techniques (AAT) (bag-mask ventilation and use of extraglottic devices) performed by paramedics in the prehospital setting. A priori outcomes to be assessed were survival, neurologic outcome, airway management success rates and complications. We identified trials using EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, author contacts and hand searching. We included 5 trials enrolling a total of 1559 patients. No individual study showed any statistical difference in outcomes between the TI and AAT groups. Because of study heterogeneity, we did not pool the data. This is the most comprehensive review to date on paramedic trials. Owing to the heterogeneity of prehospital systems, administrators of each system must individually consider their airway management protocols.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Comparison of tracheal intubation and alternative airway techniques performed in the prehospital setting by paramedics: a systematic review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Comparison of tracheal intubation and alternative airway techniques performed in the prehospital setting by paramedics: a systematic review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Comparison of tracheal intubation and alternative airway techniques performed in the prehospital setting by paramedics: a systematic review
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Emergency Medical Services, QEII Health Sciences Centre, 1796 Summer St., Rm. 3022, Halifax NS B3H 3A7; jljensen@dal.ca
References
Hide All
1.Emergency Cardiac Care Committee and Subcommittees, American Heart Association. Guidelines for cardiopul-monary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care. Part VI. Pediatric advanced life support. JAMA 1992;268:2262–75.
2.Dunham, CM, Barraco, RD, Clark, DE, et al. Guidelines for emergency tracheal intubation immediately after traumatic injury. J Trauma 2003;55:162–79.
3.Winchell, RJ, Hoyt, DB. Endotracheal intubation in the field improves survival in patients with severe head injury. Arch Surg. 1997;132:592–7.
4.Losek, JD, Hennes, H, Glaeser, P, et al. Prehospital care of the pulseless, non-breathing pediatric patient. Am J Emerg Med 1987;5:370–4.
5.Sirbaugh, PE, Pepe, PE, Shook, JE, et al. A prospective, population-based study of the demographics, epidemiology, management, and outcome of out-of-hospital pediatric car-diopulmonary arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:174–84.
6.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Field, B, et al. Advanced cardiac life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. NEnglJ Med 2004;351:647–56.
7.Stiell, IG, Nesbitt, LP, Pickett, W, et al. The OPALS major trauma study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity. CMAJ 2008;178:1141–52.
8.Murray, JA, Demetriades, D, Berne, TB, et al. Prehospital intubation in patients with severe head injury. J Trauma 2000;49:1065–70.
9.Davis, DP, Hoyt, DB, Ochs, M, et al. The effect of paramedic rapid sequence intubation on outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2003;54:444–53.
10.Bochicchio, GV, Ilahi, O, Joshi, M, et al. Endotracheal intubation in the field does not improve outcome in trauma patients who present without an acutely lethal brain injury. J Trauma 2003;54:307–11.
11.Warner, KJ, Cuschieri, J, Copass, MK, et al. The impact of prehospital ventilation on outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2007;62:1330–6.
12.Chi, JH, Knudson, MM, Vassar, MJ, et al. Prehospital hypoxia affects outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury: a prospective multicenter study. J Trauma 2006;61:1134–41.
13.Jadad, AR, Moore, RA, Carroll, D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized control trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.
14.Higgins, JPT, Green, S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2009. Available: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed 2010 Jan 21).
15.Higgins, JP, Thompson, SG, Deek, JJ. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60.
16.Breslow, NE, Day, NE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I — the analysis of case-control studies. IARC Sci Publ 1980:5338.
17.Egger, M, Davey Smith, G, Schneider, M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–34.
18.Gausche, M, Lewis, RJ, Stratton, SJ, et al. Effect of out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival and neurological outcome. JAMA 2000;283:783–90.
19.Bartlett, RL, Martin, SD, McMahon, JM, et al. A field comparison of the pharyngeotracheal lumen airway and the endotracheal tube. J Trauma 1992;32:280–4.
20.Goldenberg, IF, Campion, BC, Siebold, CM, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients receiving the esophageal obturator airway and the endotracheal tube in prehospital cardiopul-monary arrest. Minn Med 1986;69:707–13.
21.Staudinger, T, Brugger, S, Roggla, M, et al. Comparison of the combitube with the endotracheal tube in cardiopul-monary resuscitation in the prehospital phase. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1994;106:412–5.
22.Rumball, C, MacDonald, D, Barber, P, et al. Endotracheal intubation and esophageal tracheal combitube insertion by regular ambulance attendants: a comparative trial. Prehosp Emerg Care 2004;8:1522.
23.Lecky, F, Bryden, D, Little, R, et al. Emergency intubation for acutely ill and injured patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;2:CD001429.
24.Mulcaster, JT, Mills, J, Hung, OR, et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anaesthesiology 2003;98:23–7.
25.Kovacs, G, Bullock, G, Ackroyd-Stolarz, S, et al. A randomized controlled trial on the effect of educational interventions in promoting airway management skill maintenance. Ann Emerg Med 2000;36:301–9.
26.Wang, HE, Katz, SH. Cognitive control and prehospital endotracheal intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care 2007;11:234–9.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1481-8035
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-emergency-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 151 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 227 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.