Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T03:58:44.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canadian raising: the case against reordering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Marc Picard
Marc Picard*
Affiliation:
L’Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rule reordering as a principle of phonological change has come under heavy criticism in the recent past. A number of articles, e.g. Iverson (1973), Picard (1974), Hogg (1976), Dinnsen and Koutsoudas (1976), have been devoted to this question, endeavouring to show in one way or another that the reordering of phonological rules does not constitute a type of linguistic change. Some of the better known cases of alleged reordering have been examined, and many of these have been judged to be deficient for two main reasons: implausibility, due to the unjustified degree of abstractness involved, and inaccuracy, due to the omission or misinterpretation of crucial data. Generally, at the very least, a reasonable and plausible alternative solution has been put forth in each case.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , Fall 1977 , pp. 145 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, Charles-James 1975 Further observations on unmarked rule order. International Journal of American Linguistics 41.73–78.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1973 Canadian raising. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 18.113–35.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel and Koutsoudas, Andreas 1976 On the explanation of rule reordering. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Gregg, R. G. 1973 The diphthongs əi and aI in Scottish, Scotch-Irish, and Canadian English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 18.136–45.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard 1976 The status of rule reordering. Journal of Linguistics 12.103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, Gregory 1973 Some phonological changes that are not cases of rule reordering. Minnesota Working Papers in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language.Google Scholar
King, Robert 1972 A note on opacity and paradigm regularity. Linguistic Inquiry 3.535–38.Google Scholar
King, Robert 1973 In defence of extrinsic ordering. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1974 On the evaluation measure. Parasession on Natural Phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Picard, Marc 1974 Le mythe de la réordonnance des règles en phonologie. Montreal Working Papers 3.155–71.Google Scholar
Rudes, Blair 1976 Lexical representation and variable rules in natural generative phonology. Glossa 20.111–50.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo 1974 Words and syllables in natural generative grammar. Parasession on Natural Generative Phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar