Hostname: page-component-594f858ff7-c4bbg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-08T15:21:45.968Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "corePageComponentUseShareaholicInsteadOfAddThis": true, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English

The Design of the Canadian UnRuptured Endovascular versus Surgery (CURES) Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Tim E. Darsaut ,
J. Max Findlay  and
Jean Raymond
Tim E. Darsaut
Affiliation:
Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
J. Max Findlay
Affiliation:
Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jean Raymond*
Affiliation:
Notre-Dame Hospital, Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universit’ de Montr’al, Montreal, Quebec
*
Centre Hospitalier de l’Universit’ de Montr’al, Notre-Dame Hospital, Department of Radiology, 1560 Sherbrooke East, Pavilion Simard, Suite Z12909, Montr’al, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Once a decision has been made to treat an intact aneurysm, the best treatment remains uncertain. Both surgical and endovascular management strategies are commonly performed for these lesions. Surgical clipping, for years the standard treatment, is gradually becoming supplanted by endovascular treatment. However, there is no randomized data available to compare the results of surgery versus endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms (UIAs).

Methods:

We report the design of the Canadian UnRuptured Endovascular versus Surgery (CURES) trial to compare angiographic and clinical outcomes following treatment of UIAs.

Results:

The Canadian pilot phase will serve two purposes: i) to determine feasibility of the pivotal international study, and ii) to determine the incidence of treatment failure, a composite primary end-point comprising the occurrence of either: failure to accomplish aneurysm obliteration with the initial treatment modality, a major saccular aneurysm remnant or recurrence, or intracranial hemorrhage following treatment at one year. The pivotal international study will address which strategy leads to the best overall clinical outcomes in terms of mortality, morbidity, and clinical efficacy. CURES is designed to be a pragmatic management trial with loose inclusion criteria. The pilot study plans to enroll 260 patients, a size sufficient (at 80% power and 0.05 significance) to detect a decrease in the incidence of treatment failure from 13% to 4%. The formulation of specific hypotheses for the pivotal phase awaits the preliminary CURES morbidity and mortality results.

Conclusions:

The CURES trial intends to test surgical versus endovascular management strategies for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , March 2011 , pp. 236 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2011

References

1Weir, B.Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a review. J Neurosurg. 2002; Jan 96(1):3–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Guglielmi, G.Coil over clip. J Neurosurg. 2009; Aug 111(2):410–1; author reply 411-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Pouratian, N, Oskouian, RJ Jr, Jensen, ME, Kassell, NF, Dumont, AS.Endovascular management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006; May 77(5):572–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Prat, R, Galeano, I.Early surgical treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms associated with intracerebral haematoma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007; Jun 109(5):431–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Molyneux, A, Kerr, R, Stratton, I, et al.International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002; Oct 26 360(9342): 1267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Raja, PV, Huang, J, Germanwala, AV, Gailloud, P, Murphy, KP, Tamargo, RJ.Microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a critical review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2008; Jun 62(6):1187–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Krisht, AF, Gomez, J, Partington, S.Outcome of surgical clipping of unruptured aneurysms as it compares with a 10-year nonclipping survival period. Neurosurgery. 2006; Feb 58(2):207–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Wiebers, DO, Whisnant, JP, Huston, J, 3rd, et al.Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003; Jul 12 362(9378):103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Raaymakers, TW, Rinkel, GJ, Limburg, M, Algra, A.Mortality and morbidity of surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 1998; Aug 29(8):1531–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Johnston, SC, Wilson, CB, Halbach, VV, et al.Endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: comparison of risks. Ann Neurol. 2000; Jul 48(1):11–9.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Pierot, L, Spelle, L, Vitry, F.Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke. 2008; Sep 39(9):2497–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Raymond, J, Guilbert, F, Weill, A, et al.Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 2003; Jun 34(6):1398–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Choi, DS, Kim, MC, Lee, SK, Willinsky, RA, Terbrugge, KG.Clinical and angiographic long-term follow-up of completely coiled intracranial aneurysms using endovascular technique. J Neurosurg. 2010; Mar 112(3):575–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Johnston, SC, Dowd, CF, Higashida, RT, Lawton, MT, Duckwiler, GR, Gress, DR.Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke. 2008; Jan 39 (1):120–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Rates of delayed rebleeding from intracranial aneurysms are low after surgical and endovascular treatment. Stroke. 2006; Jun 37 (6):1437–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Wermer, MJ, van der Schaaf, IC, Algra, A, Rinkel, GJ.Risk of rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in relation to patient and aneurysm characteristics: an updated meta-analysis. Stroke. 2007; Apr 38(4):1404–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Gnanalingham, KK, Apostolopoulos, V, Barazi, S, O’Neill, K.The impact of the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) on the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in a neurosurgical unit in the UK. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006; Feb 108(2):117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Raymond, J.Managing unruptured aneurysms: the ethical solution to the dilemma. Can J Neurol Sci. 2009; 36(2):138–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Raymond, J, Guillemin, F, Proust, F, et al.The Trial on Endovascular Aneurysm Management (TEAM) collaborative group. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a critical review of available studies and of appropriate methods to address the clinical problem. Interventional Neuroradiology. March 2008; 14:85–96.Google Scholar
20Naggara, O, White, PM, Guilbert, F, Roy, D, Weill, A, Raymond, J.Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature on safety and efficacy. Radiology. 2010; Jul 15. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
21Johnston, SC.Identifying confounding by indication through blinded prospective review. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; Aug 1 154 (3):276–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Nguyen, TN, Raymond, J, Guilbert, F, et al.Association of endovascular therapy of very small ruptured aneurysms with higher rates of procedure-related rupture. J Neurosurg. 2008; Jun 108(6):1088–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Lawton, MT, Spetzler, RF.Surgical management of giant intracranial aneurysms: experience with 171 patients. Clin Neurosurg. 1995; 42:245–66.Google ScholarPubMed
24Drake, CG.Giant intracranial aneurysms: experience with surgical treatment in 174 patients. Clin Neurosurg. 1979; 26:12–95.Google ScholarPubMed
25Gruber, A, Killer, M, Bavinzski, G, Richling, B.Clinical and angiographic results of endosaccular coiling treatment of giant and very large intracranial aneurysms: a 7-year, single-center experience. Neurosurgery. 1999; Oct 45(4):793–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Piepgras, DG, Khurana, VG, Whisnant, JP.Ruptured giant intracranial aneurysms. Part II. A retrospective analysis of timing and outcome of surgical treatment. J Neurosurg. 1998; Mar 88 (3):430–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Sluzewski, M, Menovsky, T, van Rooij, WJ, Wijnalda, D.Coiling of very large or giant cerebral aneurysms: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; Feb 24(2):257–62.Google ScholarPubMed
28Day, AL, Gaposchkin, CG, Yu, CJ, Rivet, DJ, Dacey, RG Jr. Spontaneous fusiform middle cerebral artery aneurysms: characteristics and a proposed mechanism of formation. J Neurosurg. 2003; Aug 99(2):228–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Morley, TPBarr, HW.Giant intracranial aneurysm: diagnosis, course, and management. Clin Neurosurg. 1969; 16:73–94.Google ScholarPubMed
30Roy, D, Milot, G, Raymond, J.Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001; Sep 32(9):1998–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Raymond, J, Molyneux, AJ, Fox, AJ, Johnston, SC, Collet, JP, Rouleau, I.The TEAM trial: safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the prevention of aneurysmal hemorrhages: a randomized comparison with indefinite deferral of treatment in 2002 patients followed for 10 years. Trials. 2008; 9:43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar