Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:21:15.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discharge Destination from Acute Care after Traumatic Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Hwan Kim ,
Angela Colantonio ,
Raisa Deber  and
Lee Vernich
Hwan Kim
Affiliation:
Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Angela Colantonio*
Affiliation:
Department of Occupational Therapy, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Raisa Deber
Affiliation:
Department of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Lee Vernich
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To identify the impact of private insurance coverage on discharge disposition after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) using injury in a motor vehicle accident (MVA) as a proxy for private insurance, controlling for age and severity of injury.

Method:

Cross-sectional study.

Patients:

Patients with TBI discharged between 1993-1994 and 2000-2001 (n = 9,703).

Main Outcome Measure:

Discharge destination from acute care; controlled odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) for type of injury.

Results:

Type of injury, age, and length of stay are significantly associated with discharge destination. However, the motor vehicle accident patients are 56% more likely to be discharged to home with support services than patients with similar injuries from falls.

Conclusion:

Even in a system with universal coverage, availability of private insurance type is a potential independent determinant of postacute care services. More research is required to determine the effect this relationship has on the cost and outcomes of care for TBI patients.

Résumé

RÉSUMÉObjectif:

Identifier l'impact d'une couverture par une assurance privée sur l'orientation des patients au congé d'une institution de soins actifs après un traumatisme crânien (TC). Un traumatisme subi lors d'un accident de la route a servi d'indicateur de substitution pour l'assurance privée, après ajustement pour l'âge et la sévérité de la lésion.

Méthodes:

Il s'agit d'une étude transversale.

Patients:

Les patients ayant subi une lésion cérébrale par traumatisme crânien qui ont reçu leur congé d'un hôpital de soins de courte durés entre 1993-1994 et 2000-2001 (n = 9 703).

Critère d’élvaluation principal:

L'orientation au congé était l'issue principale; le rapport de cotes et l'intervalle de confiance ont été ajustés pour le type de lésion.

Résultats:

Il existait une association significative entre l'orientation au moment du congé et le type de lésion, l'âge du patient et la durée de l'hospitalisation. Cependant, les patients qui ont subi un accident de la route sont 56% plus susceptibles d'être retournés à domicile avec des services d'appoint que les patients qui ont subi des lésions similaires à cause d'une chute.

Conclusion:

Même dans un système où il existe une couverture universelle des soins de santé, la disponibilité d'une assurance privée peut être un déterminant indépendant des services après la période de soins aigus. Son influence sur le coût et l'issue des soins chez les TC devront faire l'objet de recherches plus poussées.

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 48 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2006

References

1. Chan, L, Doctor, J, Temkin, N, et al. Discharge disposition from acutecare after traumatic brain injury: the effect of insurance type. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001:1151–4.Google Scholar
2. Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology (2001): The Health of Canadians: The Federal Role. The story so far: Interim report on the state of the health care system in Canada. Vol. 1. Ottawa, Ontario: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
3. Landry, M. Physical therapy services in Ontario: Assessing achanging public/private mix. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto (Toronto, Canada); 2005.Google Scholar
4. Canadian Institute for Health Information. National HealthExpenditure Trends, 1975–2003; http://www.cihi.ca. Last updated June 4, 2004; accessed Sept. 2004.Google Scholar
5. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada (Roy JRomanow Commissioner). Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada: Final Report. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer, 2002.Google Scholar
6. Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science andTechnology (2002): The Health of Canadians: The Federal Role. Recommendations for reform: Final report on the state of the health care system in Canada. Vol. 6. Ottawa, Ontario: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
7. Deber, R. Health care reform: Lessons from Canada. Am J Pub Health. 2003; 93:20–4.Google Scholar
8. Deber, R. Delivering health care: public, not-for-profit, or private? The fiscal sustainability of health care in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004:233–96.Google Scholar
9. Landry, M, Williams, A, Deber, R, et al. Market failure in Ontario’shome and community sector: The case of publicly funded physical therapy services. Quebec City, Quebec: Canadian Physiotherapy Association Congress, May 30th, 2004.Google Scholar
10. Hoppe, E, Rowat, B, Verrier, MC. A black box: the rehabilitationclinic. Physiother Can. 1996;48(1):106–17.Google Scholar
11. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Ontario Trauma Registry 2001a Report. Hospital Injury Admissions. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2001.Google Scholar
12. ICD-9-CM: The International Classification of Diseases, 9th version, Clinical Modification. Available from: http://www.cs.umu.se/~medinfo/ICD9.html. Jul. 1996.Google Scholar