Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:02:38.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Excitability of Human Corticospinal Neurons is Depressed by Thiopental

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

K. Kong
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology and Playfair Neuroscience Unit, University of Toronto, Toronto
C. Ukachoke
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology and Playfair Neuroscience Unit, University of Toronto, Toronto
G. McGuire
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto
D. Wong
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto
P. Ashby*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology and Playfair Neuroscience Unit, University of Toronto, Toronto
*
Division of Neurology, Playfair Neuroscience Unit #13-319, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Streel, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 2S8
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

We tested the effect of thiopental on the excitability of the corticospinal-motoneuron axis in normal human subjects.

Methods

Magnetic stimulation was used to excite the neurons in the motor cortex which give rise to the fast conducting corticospinal pathway. The characteristics of the composite excitatory post-synaptic potentials (EPSPs) produced in individual spinal motoneurons by cortical stimulation were derived from changes in the firing probability of voluntarily activated motor units of the first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Results

In 5 normal subjects, we found that thiopental, in incremental doses sufficient to sustain drowsiness (total dose 75 to 175 mg), significantly reduced the amplitude of these composite EPSPs.

Conclusions

Thiopental reduced the facilitation of motoneurons from the cortex most likely by depressing cortical neurons.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1995

References

1.Olsen, RW.Barbiturates. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1988; 26: 254261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Day, BL, Dressier, D, Maertens de Noordhout, A, et al. Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J Physiol 1989; 412: 449473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Edgley, SA, Eyre, JA, Lemon, RN, Miller, S.Excitation of corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey. J Physiol 1990; 425: 301320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Burke, D, Hicks, R, Gandevia, SC, et al. Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation. J Physiol 1993; 470: 383393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Palmer, E, Ashby, P.Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurons in humans. J Physiol 1992; 448: 397412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Ashby, P, Zilm, D.Relationship between EPSP shape and cross-correlation profile explored by computer simulation for studies on human motoneurons. Exp Brain Res 1982; 47: 3340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Palmer, E, Ashby, P.Evidence that a long latency stretch reflex in humans is transcortical. J Physiol 1992; 449: 429440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Maertens de Noordhout, A, Rothwell, JC, Day, BL, et al. Effect of digital nerve stimulation on responses to electrical or magnetic stimulation of the human brain. J Physiol 1992; 447: 535548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Mao, CC, Ashby, P, Wang, M, McCrea, D.Synaptic connections from large muscle afferents to the motoneurons of various leg muscles in man. Exp Brain Res 1984; 56: 341350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Burke, D, Hicks, H, Stephen, J.Anodal and cathodal stimulation of the upper-limb area of the human motor cortex. Brain 1992; 115: 14971508.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Hicks, RG, Woodforth, IJ, Crawford, MR, Stephen, JPH, Burke, DJ.Some effects of isoflurane on I waves of the motor evoked potential. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69: 130136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hicks, R, Burke, D, Stephen, J, Woodforth, I, Crawford, M.Corticospinal volleys evoked by electrical stimulation of human motor cortex after withdrawal of volatile anaethetics. J Physiol 1992; 456: 393404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Loughnan, BA, Anderson, SK, Hetreed, MA, et al. Effects of halothane on motor evoked potential recorded in the extradural space. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 561564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Brouwer, B, Ashby, P, Midroni, G.Excitability of corticospinal neurons during tonic muscle contractions in man. Exp Brain Res 1989; 74: 649652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Edwards, FR, Redman, SJ, Walmsley, B.The effect of polarizing currents on unitary la excitatory post-synaptic potentials evoked in spinal neurons. J Physiol 1976; 259: 705723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Schwindt, PC, Calvin, WH.Equivalence of synaptic and injected current in determining the membrane potential trajectory during motoneuron rhythmic firing. Brain Res 1973; 59: 389394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Zentner, J, Kiss, I, Ebner, A.Influence of anaesthetics – nitrous oxide in particular – on electro-myographic response evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation of the cortex. Neurosurgery 1989; 24: 253256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hufnagel, A, Elger, CE, Marx, W, Ising, A.Magnetic motor-evoked potentials in epilepsy: effect of the disease and of anticonvulsant medication. Ann Neurol 1990; 28: 680686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Haghighi, SS, Madsen, R, Green, KD, Oro, JJ, Krackle, GR.Suppression of motor evoked potentials by inhalation anesthetics. J Neurosurg Anesthesia 1990; 2: 7378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Zentner, J, Ebner, A.Nitrous oxide suppresses the electromyographic response evoked by electrical stimulation of the motor cortex. Neurosurgery 1989; 24: 6062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Calancie, B, Klose, KJ, Baier, S, Green, BA.Isoflurane-induced attenuation of motor evoked potentials caused by electrical motor cortex stimulation during surgery. J Neurosurg 1991; 74: 897904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Kalkman, CJ, Drummond, JC, Ribberink, AA, et al. Effects of propofol, etomidate, midazolam and fentanyl on motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation in humans. Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 502509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed