Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T17:23:45.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 in a Pediatric Population: Ste-Justine's Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

J.M. Boulanger
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Neurology HSJ, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal University, Montreal, QC, Canada
A. Larbrisseau
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Neurology HSJ, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal University, Montreal, QC, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

To date, few pediatric series of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) have been described in the literature even though it is the most frequently encountered phakomatosis.

Methods:

We reviewed 987 charts of pediatric patients with a presumptive diagnosis of NF-1 who were evaluated at Ste-Justine hospital from January 1, 1991 to July 31, 2002. Patients who presented with two or more cardinal criteria were diagnosed with NF-1. Clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively collected, including: demographics, neuroimaging and presence or absence of associated symptoms or signs of NF-1.

Results:

A total of 279 patients were diagnosed with NF-1. The mean age at diagnosis was 3.4 years. Ninety-nine percent of the patients had café au lait spots and 47% had a first degree relative with NF-1. Almost 60 percent (59.6%) of those seen by an ophthalmologist had Lisch nodules. Optic glioma was found in in 14.7%, cutaneous neurofibromas in 38.4%, plexiform neurofibromas in 24.7%, neurofibrosarcoma in 1.8%, learning disabilities in 39%, attention deficit disorder in 40.5%, osseous dysplasias in 7.2%, pseudoarthrosis in 3.6%, precocious puberty in 3.2% and short stature in 17.9%. Magnetic resonance, when performed, showed hyperintense T2 lesions in 87.1% of cases. The mean period of follow-up was 7.4 years.

Conclusion:

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a multisystemic disorder associated with increased risk of malignancy. It can be diagnosed at a very young age and clinical follow-up is advised. To our knowledge, this is the largest single center study of NF-1 in a pediatric population.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ:Introduction:

Bien que la neurofibromatose de type 1 (NF-1) soit la phacomatose la plus fréquente, peu de séries de patients d’âge pédiatrique atteints de NF-1 ont été rapportées dans la littérature.

Méthodes:

Nous avons revu 987 dossiers de patients d’âge pédiatrique chez qui l’hypothèse retenue quant au diagnostic était la NF- 1, qui ont été examinés à l’hôpital Ste-Justine entre le 1er janvier 1991 et le 31 juillet 2002. Un diagnostic de NF-1 était posé si les patients présentaient deux critères cardinaux ou plus de la maladie. Les données cliniques et les résultats d’investigations suivants ont été colligés rétrospectivement: les informations démographiques, la neuroimagerie et la présence ou l’absence de symptômes ou de signes associés de la NF-1.

Résultats:

On a posé un diagnostic de NF-1 chez 279 patients. L’âge moyen des patients au moment du diagnostic était de 3,4 ans. Quatre-vingt-dix-neuf pour cent des patients avaient des taches café au lait et 47% avaient un apparenté au premier degré atteint de NF-1. À peu près soixante pour cent (59,6%) de ceux qui ont été examinés par un ophtalmologiste avaient des nodules de Lisch. Un gliome optique était présent chez 14,7%, des neurofibromes cutanés chez 38,4%, des neurofibromes plexiformes chez 24,7%, un neurofibrosarcome chez 1,8%, des troubles d’apprentissage chez 39%, un trouble de déficit de l’attention chez 40,5%, des dysplasies osseuses chez 7,2%, une pseudarthrose chez 3,6%, une puberté précoce chez 3,2% et une insuffisance staturale chez 17,9%. Chez ceux qui ont subi une imagerie par résonance magnétique, on a observé des lésions hyper intenses en T2 chez 87,1% des cas. Le suivi moyen était de 7,4 ans.

Conclusion:

La neurofibromatose de type 1 est une maladie multisystémique associée à un risque accru de cancer. Le diagnostic peut être fait en très bas âge et un suivi s’impose. À notre connaissance il s’agit de la plus grande étude de patients pédiatriques atteints de NF-1 effectuée dans un même centre.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2005

References

1. Barker, D, Wright, E, Nguyen, K, et al. Gene for von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis is in the pericentromeric region of chromosome 17. Science 1987;236:11001102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Weiss, B, Bollag, G, Shannon, K. Hyperactive Ras as a therapeutictarget in neurofibromatosis type. AM J Med Genet 1999;89:1422.Google Scholar
3. Martin, GA, Viskochil, D, Bollag, G, et al. The GAP-related domain of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene product interacts with ras p21. Cell 1990;63:843849.Google Scholar
4. Huson, SM, Compston, DA, Harper, PS. A genetic study of vonRecklinghausen neurofibromatosis in south east Wales. II. Guidelines for genetic counselling. J Med Genet 1989;26:712729.Google Scholar
5. DeBella, K, Szudek, J, Friedman, JM. Use of the national institutes of health criteria for diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 in children. Pediatrics 2000;105:608614.Google Scholar
6. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: neurofibromatosis; Bethesda, Md., USA, July 13–15, 1987. Neurofibromatosis 1988;1:172–178.Google Scholar
7. Cnossen, MH, de Goede-Bolder, A, van den Broek, KM, et al. A prospective 10 year follow-up study of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Arch Dis Child 1998;78:408412.Google Scholar
8. Huson, SM, Neurofibromatosis 1: a clinical and genetic overview.Hughes RAC (Eds). The Neurofibromatoses: A Pathogenetic and Clinical Overview. London: Chapman and Hall, 1994; 160203 Google Scholar
9. Obringer, AC, Meadows, AT, Zackai, EH. The diagnosis of neurofibromatosis-1 in the child under the age of 6 years. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:717719.Google Scholar
10. Listernick, R, Charrow, J, Greenwald, M, Mets, M. Natural history ofoptic pathway tumors in children with neurofibromatosis type 1:a longitudinal study. J Pediatr 1994;125:6366.Google Scholar
11. Singhal, S, Birch, JM, Kerr, B, Lashford, L, Evans, DG. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and sporadic gliomas. Arch Dis Child 2002;87:6570.Google Scholar
12. Balcer, LJ, Liu, GT, Heller, G, et al. Visual loss in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and optic pathway gliomas: relation to tumor location by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:442445.Google Scholar
13. Mikaeloff, Y, Chaix, Y, Grill, J, et al. Optic pathway gliomas inneurofibromatosis type 1. Longitudinal study of 30 cases in two multidisciplinary practices (French). Arch Pediatr 2002;9;797804.Google Scholar
14. Parsa, CF, Hoyt, CS, Lesser, RL, et al. Spontaneous regression of optic gliomas: thirteen cases documented by serial neuroimaging. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:516529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Cnossen, MH, Stam, EN, Cooiman, LC, et al. Endocrinologic disorders and optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Pediatrics 1997;100:667670.Google Scholar
16. Virdis, R, Sigorini, M, Laiolo, A, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and precocious puberty. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metabol 2000;13 (Suppl 1):841844.Google Scholar
17. Needle, MN, Cnaan, A, Dattilo, J, et al. Prognostic signs in thesurgical management of plexiform neurofibromas: the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia experience. J Pediatr 1997;131:678682.Google Scholar
18. McCarron, KF, Goldblum, JR. Plexiform neurofibroma with andwithout associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 54 cases. Mod Pathol 1998;11:612617.Google Scholar
19. Koth, CM, Cutting, LE, Denckla, MB. The association of neurofibromatosis type 1 and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child Neuropsychol 2000;6:185194.Google Scholar
20. Costa, RM, Federov, NB, Kogan, JH, et al. Mechanism for thelearning deficits in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1. Nature 2002;415:526530.Google Scholar
21. Gutmann, D. Recent insights into neurofibromatosis type 1: Cleargenetic progress. Arch of Neurol 1998;55:778780.Google Scholar
22. North, K, Joy, P, Yuille, D, et al. Specific learning disability in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: significance of MRI abnormalities. Neurology 1994;44:878883.Google Scholar
23. Feldmann, R, Denecke, J, Grenzebach, M, Schuierer, G, Meglage, J. Neurofibromatosis type 1: motor and cognitive function and T2-weighted MRI hyperintensities. Neurology 2003; 61:17251728.Google Scholar
24. Hyman, SL, Gill, DS, Shores, EA, et al. Natural history of cognitive deficits and their relationship to MRI T2-hyperintensitis in NF-1. Neurology 2003;60:139145.Google Scholar
25. Legius, E, Descheemaeker, MJ, Steyaert, J, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 in childhood: correlation of MRI findings with intelligence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995;59:638640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Moore, BD, Slopis, JM, Schomer, D, Jackson, EF, Levy, BM. Neuropsychological significance of areas of high signal intensity on brain MRIs of children with neurofibromatosis. Neurology 1996;46:16601668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. North, KN, Riccardi, V, Samango-Sprouse, C, et al. Cognitive function and academic performance in neurofibromatosis type 1: consensus statement from the NF-1 Cognitive Task Force. Neurology 1997;48:11211127.Google Scholar
28. Fossali, E, Signori, E, Intermite, RC, et al. Renovascular disease and hypertension in children with neurofibromatosis. Pediatr Nephrol 2000;14:806810.Google Scholar
29. Virdis, R, Balestrazzi, P, Zampolli, M, et al. Hypertension in childrenwith neurofibromatosis. J Hum Hypertens 1994;8:395397.Google Scholar
30. Kulkantrakorn, K, Geller, TJ. Seizures in neurofibromatosis 1. Pediatr Neurol 1998;19;347350.Google Scholar
31. Es, SV, North, KN, McHugh, K, Silva, MD. MRI findings in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: a prospective study. PediatrRadiol 1996; 26:478487.Google ScholarPubMed