Skip to main content Accessibility help

Adaptive preferences: merging political accounts and well-being accounts

  • Rosa Terlazzo (a1)


Accounts of adaptive preferences are of two kinds: well-being accounts fully theorized for their own sake and political accounts theorized to facilitate the political project of reducing oppression and marginalization. Given their practical role, the latter are often less fully theorized, and are therefore less robust to theoretical criticism. In this paper, I first draw on well-being accounts to identify the well-theorized elements that political accounts should want to adopt in order to strengthen their project and avoid common criticisms. Second, I appeal to the political project to show the shortcomings of the well-being accounts on which I draw.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Baber, H. E. 2007. “Adaptive Preference.”; Social Theory and Practice 33 (1): 105126.
Bruckner, Donald W. 2009. “In Defense of Adaptive Preferences.”; Philosophical Studies 142 (3): 307324.
Colburn, Ben. 2011. “Autonomy and Adaptive Preferences.”; Utilitas 23 (1): 5271.
Deneulin, Séverine. 2002. “Perfectionism, Paternalism and Liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum’s Capability Approach.”; Review of Political Economy 14 (4): 497518.
Dorsey, Dale. 2010. “Preferences, Welfare, and the Status-Quo Bias.”; Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3): 535554.
Dorsey, Dale. 2012. The Basic Minimum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, Jennifer. 2008. “Well-being, Autonomy, and the Horizon Problem.”; Utilitas 20 (2): 143168.
Jaggar, Alison M. 2005. “‘Saving Amina’: Global Justice for Women and Intercultural Dialogue.”; Ethics & International Affairs 19 (3): 5575.
Jaggar, Alison. 2006. “Reasoning About Well-being: Nussbaum’s Method of Justifying the Capabilities Approach.”; Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (3): 301322.
James, Williams. 1979. “The Will to Believe.”; In The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Khader, Serene J. 2011. Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Empowerment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Khader, Serene J. 2012. “Must Theorizing about Adaptive Preferences Deny Women’s Agency?”; Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (4): 302317.
Khader, Serene J. 2013. “Identifying Adaptive Preferences in Practice: Lessons from Post-colonial Feminisms.”; Journal of Global Ethics 9 (3): 311327.
Levey, Ann. 2005. “Liberalism, Adaptive Preferences, and Gender Equality.”; Hypatia 20 (4): 127143.
Narayan, Uma. 2002. “Minds of Their Own: Choices, Autonomy, Cultural Practices, and Other Women.”; In A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, edited by Antony, Louise M. and Witt, Charlotte E.. Boulder: Westview Press.
Nussbaum, Martha. 1992. “Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism.”; Political Theory 20 (2): 202246.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. “Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Options.”; Economics and Philosophy 17 (1): 6788.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. “Perfectionist Liberalism and Political Liberalism.”; Philosophy & Public Affairs 39 (1): 345.
Okin, Susan Moller. 1994. “Gender Inequality and Cultural Differences.”; Political Theory 22 (1): 524.
Quong, Jonathan. 2011. Liberalism without Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. Expanded ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1980. “Equality of What?”; In Tanner Lectures on Human Values, edited by McMurrin, S.. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1993. “Capability and Well-being.”; In The Quality of Life, edited by Nussbaum, Martha and Sen, Amartya. Oxford: Clarendon.
Stoljar, Natalie. 2000. “Autonomy and the Feminist Intuition.”; In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, edited by Mackenszie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sugden, Robert. 2006. “What We Desire, What We Have Reason to Desire, Whatever We Might Desire: Mill and Sen on the Value of Opportunity.”; Utilitas 18 (1): 3351.
Superson, Anita. 2005. “Deformed Desires and Informed Desire Tests.”; Hypatia 20 (4): 109126.
Terlazzo, Rosa. Forthcoming. “Conceptualizing Adaptive Preferences Respectfully: An Indirectly Substantive Account.”; Journal of Political Philosophy.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Adaptive preferences: merging political accounts and well-being accounts

  • Rosa Terlazzo (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.