We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2009
This study assesses the contribution of five of the research studies done for the Macdonald Royal Commission and of the opening chapter of the Commission Report to our understanding of the state. It examines the use of the term state, the economic and social functions that the latter is seen to perform, and the light that these studies may shed on such thorny topics as authority, legitimacy and citizenship in the late twentieth century. It concludes that, despite individual contributions of note, there are real limitations to what this Commission and its research associates tell us about the state.
Cet article examine ce que cinq des études commandées par la Commission Macdonald et le premier chapitre du Rapport lui-même nous enseignent sur la nature de l'État. L'auteur discute de la définition de l'État, de ses fonctions économiques et sociales, et de la façon avec laquelle ces études abordent les thèmes de l'autorité, de la légitimité, et de la citoyenneté en cette fin du 20e siècle. L'article conclut que certaines de ces études ont une valeur réelle, mais que l'apport global de ces volumes à notre compréhension de l'État moderne reste fort limité.
1 Cairns, Alan and Williams, Cynthia, “Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada: An Overview,” in Cairns, Alan and Williams, Cynthia (eds.), Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada, Royal Commission Research Studies, Vol. 33 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1985), 2.Google Scholar
2 Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada Report, Vol. 1 (Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, 1985), 11.Google Scholar
3 Ibid., 12.
4 Ibid., 65.
5 Thus, the term “state” appears on pages 7, 11,26-27,31, 39 of vol. 1 of the Report and the term “government” on pages 24-25, 28, 35, 38.
6 Badie, Bertrand and Birnbaum, Pierre, The Sociology of the State (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1983)Google Scholar, Part 3.
7 Mann, Thomas, Reflections of a Non-Political Man (New York: Frederick Ungar, 1983), 178.Google Scholar
8 Compare Nicolet, Claude, L'ldlée républicaine en France (1789-1924) (Paris: Gallimard, 1982).Google Scholar
9 Royal Commission Report, Vol. 1, 41, 43, 65.Google Scholar
10 Ibid., 65.
11 Cairns, Alan, “The Embedded State: State-Society Relations in Canada,” in Banting, Keith (ed.), State and Society: Canada in Comparative Perspective, Royal Commission Research Studies, Vol. 31 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1986), 55.Google Scholar
12 Ibid., 57.
13 Ibid., 68, 71, 82.
14 Constant, Benjamin, De la liberté des anciens comparée à ceile des modernes in Cours de politique constitutionnelle (Paris: Guillaumin, 1872), Vol. 2, 539-60.Google Scholar
15 Royal Commision Report, Vol. 1, 20.Google Scholar
16 Cairns, “The Embedded State,” 83.
17 Crozier, Michael, Huntington, Samuel P., and Watanaki, Joji, The Crisis of Democracy (The Trilateral Commission: New York University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
18 Cairns and Williams, “Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada,” 44.
19 The same process is at work in the federalism section of the research studies with Daniel Latouche's passionately nationalist essay (vol. 70), encompassed within a sea of more conventional federalist discourse.
20 Doern, Bruce, “The Politics of Canadian Economic Policy: An Overview,” in Doern, Bruce (ed.), The Politics of Economic Policy, Royal Commission Research Studies, Vol. 40 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1985), 6.Google Scholar
21 Althusser, Louis, “Les appareils idéologiques d'État,” in Positions (Paris: Éditions Sociales, 1976), 67–125.Google Scholar
22 Doern, “The Politics of Canadian Economic Policy,” 1.
23 Ibid., 6-7.
24 Laidler, David, “Economic Ideas and Social Issues: An Overview,” in Laidler, David (ed.), Approaches to Economic Weil-Being, Royal Commission Research Studies, Vol. 26 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1985), 5.Google Scholar
25 Ibid., 9.
26 Ibid., 21.
27 Banting, Keith, “Images of the Modern State: An Introduction,” in Banting, Keith (ed.), State and Society, 1.Google Scholar
28 Ibid., 17.
29 Rice, James, “Politics of Income Security: Historical Developments and Limits to Future Change,” in Doern, (ed.), The Politics of Economic Policy, 247.Google Scholar
30 Cameron, David R., “The Growth of Government Spending: The Canadian Experience in Comparative Perspective,” in Banting, (ed.), State and Society, 21–51.Google Scholar
31 Korpi, Walter, The Democratic Class Struggle (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983).Google Scholar
32 Peacock, A. T. and Wiseman, J., The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
33 Buchanan, James and Wagner, Richard E., Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes (New York: Academic Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Offe, Class, Contradictions of the Welfare State (Boston: M.I.T. Press, 1984)Google Scholar; O'Connor, James, The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Martin, Andrew, “The Politics of Employment and Welfare: National Policies and International Interdependence,” in Banting, Keith (ed.), The State and Economic Interests, Royal Commission Research Studies, Vol. 32 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1986), 157–241, 158.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., 158-59 (my emphasis).
36 Ibid., 229.
37 Blomqvist, A. G., “Political Economy of the Canadian Welfare State,” in Laidler, (ed.), Approaches to Economic Well-Being, 89–136, 102.Google Scholar
38 Laidler, “Economic Ideas and Social Issues,” 30, 31.
39 Ibid., 38.
40 Blomqvist, “Political Economy of the Canadian Welfare State,” 103-04.
41 Banting, Keith, “The State and Economic Interests: An Introduction,” in Banting, (ed.), The State and Economic Interests, 1–33.Google Scholar
42 William D. Coleman, “Canadian Business and the State,” ibid., 249.
43 Ibid., 251, 252.
44 Panitch, Leo, “The Tripartite Experience,” in Banting, (ed.), The Slate and Economic Interests, 37–119.Google Scholar
45 Ibid., 113.
46 Ibid., 112.
47 McRae, K. D., “Linguistic Diversity and Economic Decision-Making: Three European Case Studies,” in Banting, (ed.), The State and Economic Interests, 121-55, 152.Google Scholar
48 Fournier, Pierre, “Consensus Building in Canada: Case Studies and Prospects,” in Banting, (ed.), The State and Economic Interests, 291–335.Google Scholar
49 Ibid., 294.
50 Wolfe, David, “The Politics of the Deficit,” in Doern, (ed.), The Politics of Economic Policy, 111-62, 133.Google Scholar
51 Ibid., 137, 138.
52 Broadway, Robin and Bruce, Neil, “Theoretical Issues in Tax Reform,” in Laidler, (ed.), Approaches to Economic Well-Being, 137-93.Google Scholar
53 Wolfe, “The Politics of the Deficit,” 154.
54 Ibid., 141.
55 Doern, “The Politics of Canadian Economic Policy,” 16.
56 Ibid.
57 Birch, Anthony H., “Political Authority and Crisis in Comparative Perspective,” in , Banting (ed.), State and Society, 87–130.Google Scholar
58 Rose, Richard and Peters, Guy, Can Government Go Bankrupt? (New York: Basic Books, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59 Birch, “Political Authority and Crisis,” 120.
60 Cairns, “The Embedded State,” 54.
61 Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1976);Google ScholarPolitical Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (Boston: M.I.T. Press, 1985).Google Scholar
62 Birch, “Political Authority and Crisis,” 90.
63 Cairns and Williams, “Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada,” 41.
64 Williams, Cynthia, “The Changing Nature of Citizen Rights,” in Cairns, and Williams, (eds.), Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada, 99–131.Google Scholar
65 Cairns and Williams, “Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada,” 31.
66 Ibid., 34. See also Royal Commission Report, Vol. 1, 20.Google Scholar
67 Cairns and Williams, “Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada,” 38.
68 Knopff, Rainer and Morton, F. L., “Nation-Building and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” in Cairns, and Williams, (eds.), Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada, 133-82.Google Scholar
69 Ibid., 145.
70 Royal Commission Report, Vol. 1, 70.Google Scholar
71 Ibid., 69.
72 Taylor, Charles, “Alternative Futures: Legitimacy, Identity and Alienation in Late Twentieth Century Canada,” in Cairns, and Williams, (eds.), Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada, 183–229.Google Scholar
73 Ibid., 212, 213.
74 Ibid., 198.
75 Ibid., 211.
76 For examples of such economic and political alternatives one might cite Alec Nove, The Economics of Feasible Socialism (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1983);Google ScholarHodgson, Geoff, The Democratic Economy (London: Pelican, 1984);Google ScholarBarber, Benjamin, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984);Google ScholarDahl, Robert, A Preface to Economic Democracy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985).Google Scholar This whole literature is clearly foreign to this Royal Commission.
77 “Western societies appear to be condemned to long periods of privatization during which they live through an impoverishing ‘atrophy of public meanings’ followed by spasmodic outbursts of ‘publicness’ that are hardly likely to be constructive. What is to be done about this atrophy and subsequent spasm? How do we reintroduce more steady concern with public affairs as well as ‘genuine public celebrations’ into our everyday lives?” (Hirschman, Albert O., Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982], 132).Google Scholar
