Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T20:40:05.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Technological Rationality: Notes on “Work and Freedom in Marcuse and Marx”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

William Leiss
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina Campus

Extract

Mr Andrew has chosen an important topic for discussion, one which embraces some of the most significant theoretical and practical issues in contemporary society (both capitalist and socialist). His article is concerned with the concept of technological rationality, considered in the light of the attitudes of Marx and Marcuse towards the nature of work. He lists a series of points on which their attitudes differ and claims that “These differences may be seen to derive from a single source, namely, that Marx was not an adherent of technological rationality and Marcuse is.” In what follows I would like to comment briefly on his argument and to indicate the results of some other recent contributions to this discussion.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Andrew, Edward, “Work and Freedom in Marcuse and Marx,” this Journal, III, no. 2 (June 1970), 241–56.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., 255.

3 “Technology and Science as ‘Ideology,’” Toward a Rational Society, trans. Shapiro, J. (Boston, 1970)Google Scholar; first published in German in 1968.

4 Their essays will be found in the collection Antworten auf Herbert Marcuse, ed. Habermas, J. (Frankfurt, 1968).Google Scholar Bergmann's distinction between “technical rationality” and “technological rationality” is helpful.

5 “One-Dimensionality: The Universal Semiotic of Technological Experience,” Critical Interruptions, ed. Breines, P. (New York, 1970).Google Scholar

6 Kritik der “Politischen Technologie” (Frankfurt, 1970).

7 “Industrialism and Capitalism in the Work of Max Weber,” Negations (Boston, 1968), 218; One-Dimensional Man (Boston, 1964), 231. The essay on Weber is fundamental for understanding Marcuse's thought on the topics under discussion here.

8 One-Dimensional Man, 18.

9 Ibid., 237.

10 The reference (at p. 254 of the article) is to ibid., pp. 231, 237.

11 Ibid., p. 236.

12 “The Obsolescence of Marxism,” Marx and the Western World, ed. Lobkowicz, N. (Notre Dame, Ind., 1967), p. 415.Google Scholar

13 Der Begriff der Natur in der Lehre von Marx (Frankfurt, 1962).

14 Marx, penseur de la technique: de l'aliénation de l'homme à la conquête du monde (3rd ed., Paris, 1969). Fallot, Jean, Marx et le machinisme (Paris, 1966)Google Scholar criticizes Axelos and sketches Marx's views more accurately.

15 “Über die philosophischen Grundlagen des wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Arbeitsbegriffs” (1933), reprinted in Kultur und Gesellschaft 2 (Frankfurt, 1965); “Neue Quellen zur Grundlegung des historischen Materialismus” (1932), reprinted in Ideen zu einer kritischen Theorie der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt, 1968).