Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:42:55.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Property Rights Were Excluded from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Alexander Alvaro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Constitution Act, 1867, contained what were intended to be strong protections of property ownership. These protections gradually eroded, as property was subordinated to democratic will and legislation. The “property rights” debate took place in this context. Those provinces which opposed the property rights clause wanted to safeguard the supremacy of democratic institutions from the potential ramifications posed by such a clause. The federal government, the proponent of the clause, did not intend that such supremacy be usurped. However, the clause was never crucial to the Charter and the federal government abandoned the clause in order to achieve provincial agreement on patriation of the constitution.

Résumé

La Loi constitutionnelle de 1867 avait un contenu visant à protéger les droits de propriété. Ces mesures de protection se sont graduellement estompées pendant que la propriété a été soumise à la volonté démocratique et à la législation. Le débat sur les « droits de propriété » s'est tenu dans ce contexte. Les provinces qui se sont opposées à la clause des droits de propriété ont toujours craint la perte de la suprématie des institutions démocratiques à cause des implications possibles d'une telle clause. Le gouvernement fédéral, partisan de la clause en question, n'avait aucunement l'intention de faire en sorte que cette suprématie soit usurpée. Mais la clause n'a jamais eu un caractère décisif pour la charte et le gouvernement fédéral a laissé tomber ladite clause en vue de conclure une entente avec les provinces au niveau du rapatriement constitutionnel.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 309 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Canada, House of Commons Debates, May 2, 1988, 15044.

2 The Constitution Act, 1982, s. 38(1).

3 Monahan, Patrick, Politics and the Constitution (Toronto: Carswell/Methuen, 1987), 103–106Google Scholar.

4 George, M. Dorothy, England in Transition (London, 1931), 218Google Scholar, cited in Will and Durant, Ariel, Rousseau and Revolution (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1967), 684Google Scholar.

5 Ibid.

6 Ibid., 685.

7 Ibid., 684–85.

8 Britain, Great, Parliamentary Debates, March 8, 1763Google Scholar. Hansard's Parliamentary History of England, Vol. 15: 1753–1765 (London: TC Hansard, 1813), 1307Google Scholar.

9 (1765) 19 State Trials 1029.

10 Ibid., 1066.

11 Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957), 101Google Scholar.

12 Smiley, D. V., The Federal Condition in Canada (Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1987), 39Google Scholar.

13 Parliamentary Debates on the Subject of Confederation of the British North American Provinces, 3rd Session, 8th Provincial Parliament of Canada (Ottawa: 1865, reprinted 1951), 39Google Scholar. (Hereafter cited as Confederation Debates.)

14 Ibid., 36.

15 British North America Act, 1867, s. 23(4). Now Constitution Act, 1867.

16 Confederation Debates, 33.

17 Specifically, ss. 91(2), (15), (16), (18), (19), (21), (22), (23) and (28) of the BNA Act. Hogg, Peter W., Constitutional Law of Canada (2nd ed.; Toronto: Carswell, 1985), 454–455Google Scholar.

18 Ibid., 455.

19 Confederation Debates, 29.

20 Ibid.

21 Report of the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and House of Commons on Senate Reform (Ottawa, 1984), 8Google Scholar.

22 Scott, Frank R., “Section 94 of the British North America Act,” in Essays on the Constitution (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977), 116Google Scholar.

23 Canada, House of Commons Debates, March 12, 1902, 1093.

24 Murray, W. Gladstone, Private Property a Guarantee of Freedom: Text of Address to the Ontario Property Owners' Association (Toronto: Bryant Press, November 14, 1944), 5Google Scholar.

25 Ibid., 2.

26 Trudeau, Pierre Elliott, A Canadian Charter of Human Rights (Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1968), 17Google Scholar.

27 Ibid., 18.

28 Hogg, Constitutional Law of Canada, 747.

29 Shapiro, Martin and Tressolini, Rocco J., American Constitutional Law (New York: Macmillan, 1983), 296Google Scholar.

30 Ibid., 299.

31 Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45; 25 Sup. Ct. 539; 49 L.Ed. 937 (1905) in Shapiro and Tressolini, American Constitutional Law, 299, 314.

32 Tarnopolsky, Walter, “A Bill ofRights and Future Constitutional Change,” Canadian Bar Review 57 (1979), 632Google Scholar.

33 Ibid., 633.

34 Extract from Joint Communique of Ministers, Proposals on the Canadian Constitution, 1971–78: Collation (Ottawa: CICS, December 1978), 73Google Scholar.

35 Ibid.

36 Roblin, Senator Duff, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada, Issue 46 (Ottawa: January 27, 1981), 46:21Google Scholar.

37 The Globe and Mail, January 26, 1981, Al.

38 Murphy, Rod, in Canada, House of Commons Debates, April 29, 1983, 25008Google Scholar.

39 Horsman, James D., Notes for an Address by The Hon. James D. Horsman, Q.C. Minister of Federal and Intergovernmental Affairs, Government of Alberta, Canada, to Alberta Real Estate Association (Jasper, May 13, 1985), 5–6Google Scholar.

40 Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada, Issue 41(Ottawa,January 20, 1981), 41A:1Google Scholar, and Issue 43 (Ottawa, January 22, 1981), 43:58, 43:59.

41 The Globe and Mail, January 26, 1981, A1.

42 Trudeau, A Canadian Charter of Human Rights, 19.

43 Trudeau, Pierre E., The Constitution and the People of Canada (Ottawa, 1969), 50Google Scholar.

44 Ibid., 52.

45 Government of Canada, The Constitutional Amendment Bill: Text and Explanatory Notes (Bill C-60) (Ottawa, July 1978), 36Google Scholar.

46 MacGuigan, Mark, in Canada, House of Commons Debates, April 29, 1983, 25004Google Scholar.

47 Trudeau, Pierre E., in Canada, House of Commons Debates, January 27, 1981, 6595Google Scholar.

48 Russell, Peter H., “The Political Purposes of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” Canadian Bar Review 30 (1983), 30–54Google Scholar.

49 Knopff, Rainer and Morton, F. L., “Nation-Building and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” in Cairns, Alan and Williams, Cynthia, eds., Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press for Supply and Services Canada, 1985), 133–182Google Scholar.

50 Russell, “The Political Purposes of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” 31, and Knopff and Morton, “Nation-Building and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” 136–37.

51 Ibid., 139.

52 Russell, “The Political Purposes of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” 40–43, and Knopff and Morton, “Nation-Building and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” 144–50.

53 Ibid., 54.

54 Ibid., 148.

55 Ibid., 147.

56 Ibid., 147–48

57 Ibid., 148.

58 Monahan, Politics and the Constitution, 104.

59 Russell, “The Political Purposes of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” 30.

60 Trudeau, A Canadian Charter of Human Rights, 19.

61 Ibid., 20.

62 Trudeau, The Constitution and the People of Canada, 52.

63 Ibid.

64 Government of Canada, The Constitutional Amendment Bill: Text and Explanatory Notes, 36.

65 Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada, Report to Parliament, Issue 20(Hull,October 10, 1978), 20:11Google Scholar.

66 MacGuigan, Mark, in Canada, House of Commons Debates, April 29, 1983, 25004Google Scholar.

67 Hunter v. Southam, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, at 156.

68 2 S.C.R. 145, at 158, where Justice Dickson states: “There is … nothing in the language of [section 8] to restrict it to the protection of property or to associate it with the law of trespass. It guarantees a broad and general right to be secure from unreasonable search and seizure.”

69 Reference Re British Columbia Motor Vehicle Act, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 486.

70 Ibid., 499.

71 McBean, Jean, “The Implications of Entrenching Property Rights in Section 7 of the Charter of Rights,” Alberta Law Review 26 (1988), 548Google Scholar.

72 The Queen (N.B.) v. Fisherman's Wharf, (1982) 135 D.L.R. (3d) 307.

73 Hogg, Constitutional Law of Canada, 745, n. 17.

74 Whyte, John, “Fundamental Justice: The Scope and Application of Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” in The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Initial Experience, Emerging Issues, Future Challenges (Cowansville: Canadian Institute for Administration of Justice, 1984), 39Google Scholar. This volume is a compilation of papers delivered at the Institute's conference, October 12–15, 1983.

75 Brandt, G. J., “Right to Property as an Extension of Personal Security—Status of Undeclared Rights,” Canadian Bar Review 61 (1983), 398Google Scholar.

76 New Brunswick v. Eastabrooks Pontiac Buick Ltd.; New Brunswick v. Fisherman's Wharfs Ltd., (1982) 144 D.L.R. (3d) 21, at 31. Referred to by Garant, Patrice, “Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Justice (Section 7),” in Beaudoin, Gérald-A. and Ratushny, Ed, eds., The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (2nd ed.; Toronto: Carswell, 1989), 347Google Scholar.

77 Regal Petroleum Ltd. v. Ministry of Energy Mines and Resources, (1985), 63 N.R. 135, at 136. Referred to in Ibid.

78 Ibid.