Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-jhnrh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-01T19:55:35.829Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Systematic Review of Screening Tools for Predicting the Development of Dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2012

Andrea R. Lischka ,
Marissa Mendelsohn ,
Tom Overend  and
Dorothy Forbes
Andrea R. Lischka*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario
Marissa Mendelsohn
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario
Tom Overend
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario
Dorothy Forbes
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta
*
*Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: Andrea R. Lischka, M.Sc. Faculty of Health Sciences University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, N6G 1H1 (alischka@alumni.uwo.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Early detection of dementia is essential to guide front-line health care practitioners in further clinical evaluations and treatments. There is a paucity of literature assessing the effectiveness of screening tools to predict the development of dementia, thus we conducted a systematic review to fill this gap. The purpose of the systematic review was to make recommendations to health care practitioners on which screening tool best predicts the development of dementia and is most feasible in the primary care setting. Ten databases were searched for relevant articles, yielding 751 papers. Of these, 12 met relevance criteria for inclusion. Screening tools were assessed for test accuracy, cognitive domain coverage, predictive ability, and feasibility. Four screening tools were recommended. Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE) was considered to be the ideal tool. A revised version of this tool is now used in clinical practice but the psychometric properties of the ACE-R remain to be established.

Résumé

La détection précoce de la démence est essentielle pour guider les praticiens en premier ligne de soins de santé concernant de nouvelles évaluations cliniques et des traitements. Il y a une pénurie de la littérature qui évalue l’efficacité des outils de dépistage pour prédire le développement de la démence; ainsi, nous avons effectué une revue systématique pour combler cette lacune. Le but de l’examen systématique était de formuler des recommandations pour les praticiens de soins de santé sur lequel outil de dépistage prévoit mieux le développement de la démence et serait la plus faisable dans le contexte de soins primaires. On a cherché dix bases de données, ce qui a donné 751 articles. Parmi eux, 12 ont satisfait les critères de pertinence pour être inclus. Les outils de dépistage ont été évalués pour la précision des tests, la couverture du domaine cognitif, la capacité prédictive, et la faisabilité. Quatre outils de dépistage ont été recommandées. L’Examen cognitive d’Addenbrooke (ECA) a été considéré comme l’outil idéal. Une version revisée de cet outil est utilisée maintenant dans la pratique clinique, mais les propriétés psychometriques de l’ECA-R restent à déterminer.

Keywords

revue systématiqueoutil de dépistagedémence précocetroubles cognitifs légersdiagnosticévaluation cliniquesystematic reviewscreening toolearly dementiamild cognitive impairmentdiagnosisclinical evaluation
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 295 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alzheimer Society of Canada (ACS). (2008). Population Screening for Dementia – Position Statement. Toronto, Ontario. Retrieved February 5, 2010, fromhttp://www.alzheimer.ca/english/society/policies-popscreening.htm.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Benton, A. (1965). Manuel Pour l’Application du Test de Rétention Visuelle. Applications Cliniques et Expérimentales [Sight Retention Test Implementation Guide. Clinical and Experimental Applications]. Paris, France: Centre de Psychologic appliqué.Google Scholar
Burns, J.M., & Morris, J.C. (2008). Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Detection and Diagnosis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Buschke, H., Kuslansky, G., Katz, M., Stewart, W.F., Sliwinski, M.J., Eckholdt, H.M., et al. . (1999). Screening for dementia with the memory impairment screen. Neurology, 52, 231–238.Google Scholar
Cattarinich, X., Gibson, N., & Cave, A. (2001). Assessing mental capacity in Canadian aboriginal seniors. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1469–1479.Google Scholar
Chang, C.Y., & Silverman, D. (2004). Accuracy of early diagnosis and its impact on the management and course of Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 4(1), 63–69.Google Scholar
Chopard, G., Vanholsbeek, G., Tio, G., Pitard, A., Binetruy, M., Rumbach, L., et al. . (2009). Rapid screening of cognitive change in patients with questionable dementia using the memory impairment screen and the Isaacs set test. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57, 703–708.Google Scholar
Cullen, B., O’Neil, B., & Evans, J.J. (2007). A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment. Journal of Neurological Neurosurgery Psychiatry 78, 790–799.Google Scholar
Dartiques, J.F., Commenges, D., Letenneur, L., Barber-Gateau, P., Gilleron, V., Fabrigoule, C., et al. . (1997). Cognitive predictors of dementia in elderly community residents. Neuroepidemiology, 16, 29–39.Google Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2, 189–108.Google Scholar
Friedrich, M.J. (2009). Alzheimer researchers focus efforts on early development and earlier detection. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300, (22), 2595–2597.Google Scholar
Haynes, R.B., Sackett, D.L., Guyatt, G.H., & Tugwell, P. (2006). Clinical Epidemiology: How to do Clinical Practice Research (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.Hollingworth, W., Medina, S., Lenkinski, R.E., Shibata, D.K., Bernal, B., Zurakowski, D. et al. (2006). Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool: A preliminary assessment. Academic Radiology, 13(7), 803–810.Google Scholar
Herholz, K., Perani, D., & Morris, C. (2006). The Dementias: Early Diagnosis and Evaluation. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Imai, Y., & Hasegawa, K. (1994). The Revised Hasegawa’s Dementia Scale (HDS- R) – evaluation of its usefulness as a screening test for dementia. The Hong Kong College of Psychiatrists, 4, 20–24.Google Scholar
Isaacs, B., & Kennie, A.T. (1973). The set test as an aid to the detection of dementia in old people. The British journal of Psychiatry, 123, 467–470.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J.W., Bernhard, M.R., Delgado, A., & Strain, J.J. (1977). Screening for organic mental syndromes in the medically ill. Annals of Internal Medicine, 86, 40–46.Google Scholar
Jorm, A.F., & Jacomb, P.A. (1989). The informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): Socio-demographic correlates, reliability, validity and some norms. Psychological Medicine, 19, 1015–1022.Google Scholar
Kerwin, D.R., (2009). How to prevent a delayed Alzheimer’s diagnosis. The Journal of Family Practice, 58(1), 9–15.Google Scholar
Kokmen, E, Naessens, J.M., & Offord, K.P. (1987). A short test of mental status: description and preliminary results. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 62, 281–288.Google Scholar
Lam, L.C.W., Tam, C.W.C., Lui, V.W.C., Chan, W.C., Chan, S.S.M., Chui, H.F.K., et al. . (2008). Screening of mild cognitive impairment in Chinese older adults—a multistage validation of the Chinese abbreviated mild cognitive impairment test. Neuroepidemiology, 30, 6–12.Google Scholar
Larner, A.J. (2007). Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination (ACE) for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dementia. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 109, 491–494.Google Scholar
Mariani, E., Monastero, R., & Mecocci, P. (2007). Mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 12, 23–35.Google Scholar
Mathuranath, P.S., Nestor, P.J., Berrios, G.E., Rakowicz, W., & Hodges, J.R. (2000). A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 55, 1613–1620Google Scholar
Mioshi, E., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Arnold, R., & Hodges, J.R. (2006). The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 1078–1085.Google Scholar
Molloy, D.W., Alemayehu, E., & Roberts, R. (1991). Reliability of a standardized mini-mental state examination compared with the traditional mini-mental state examination. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 102–105.Google Scholar
Nasreddine, Z.S., Collin, I., Chertkow, H., Phillips, N., Bergman, H., & Whitehead, V. (2003). Sensitivity and specificity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for detection of mild cognitive deficits. Canadian Journal Neurological Sciences, 30(2 Suppl. 2), 30. Presented at Canadian Congress of Neurological Sciences Meeting, Québec City, Québec, June 2003.Google Scholar
Nasreddine, Z.S., Phillips, N.A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., et al. . (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699.Google Scholar
Nestor, P.J., Scheltens, P., & Hodges, J.R. (2004). Advances in the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 7, 534–540.Google Scholar
Rosen, W.G., Mohs, R.C., & Davis, K.L. (1984). A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 1356–1364.Google Scholar
Roth, M., Tym, E., Mountjoy, C.Q., Huppert, F.A., Hendrie, H., Verma, S., et al. . (1986). CAMDEX. A standardized instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 698–709.Google Scholar
Rozzini, L., Chilovi, V.C., Bertoletti, E., Conti, M., Delrio, I., Trabucchi, M., et al. . (2008). The importance of Alzheimer disease assessment scale-cognitive part in predicting progress for amnestic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, (4), 261–267.Google Scholar
Schmand, B., Walstra, G., Lindeboom, J., Teunisse, S., & Jonker, C. (2000). Early detection of Alzheimer’s disease using the Cambridge cognitive examination (CAMCOG). Psychological Medicine, 30, 619–627.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Gildeh, N., & Holmes, C. (2007). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 52(5), 329–332.Google Scholar
Srikanth, V., Thrift, A., Fryer, J., Saling, M.M., Dewey, H.M., Sturm, J.W., et al. . (2006). The validity of brief screening cognitive instruments in the diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia after first-ever stroke. International Psychogeriatrics, 18(2), 295–305.Google Scholar
Tang-Wai, D.F., Knopman, D.S., Geda, Y., Edland, S., Smith, G.E., Ivnik, R.J., et al. . (2003). Comparison of the short test of mental status and the mini- mental state examination in mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Neurology, 60, 1777–1781.Google Scholar
Tierney, M.C., Szalai, J.P., Dunn, E., Geslani, D., & McDowell, I. (2000). Prediction of probable Alzheimer disease in patients with symptoms suggestive of memory impairment. Archives of Family Medicine, 9, 527–532.Google Scholar
Tsukamoto, R., Akisaki, T., Kuranaga, M., Takata, T., Yokono, K., & Sakirai, T. (2009). Hasegawa dementia scale-revised, for screening of early Alzheimer’s disease in the elderly with type 2 diabetes. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 9, 213–215.Google Scholar
Weiner, M.F., & Lipton, A.M. (2009). The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Alzheimer’s Disease and other Dementias. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Whiting, P., Rutjes, A.S., Reitsma, J.B., Bossuyt, P.M., & Kleijnen, J. (2003). The development of the QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3, 1–13.Google Scholar
Xu, G., Meyer, J.S., Thornby, J., Chowdhury, M., & Quach, M. (2002). Screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) utilizing combined mini-mental cognitive capacity examinations for identifying dementia prodromes. International journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 1027–1033.Google Scholar
Yudofsky, S.C., & Kim, H.F. (2004). Neuropsychiatric Assessment. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar