Skip to main content
×
Home

China Scholars and Twitter

  • Jonathan Sullivan (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Situating external engagement within the broader context of developments in Western higher education (HE) and technologies that are changing many aspects of academic life, this research note draws on the experiences of a large number of China scholars to assess the merits of Twitter for individual academics and the field as whole. Celebrating its tenth anniversary in March 2016, Twitter has shaken off its earlier image of celebrity stalking and inane ephemera and has become a tool used by many professionals working on China. Despite initial scepticism, many academics have recognized the utility of Twitter for various professional activities, including networking, increasing research visibility, gathering and disseminating information, and building a public profile. As external engagement activities become a routine expectation for academics in many Western universities, social media like Twitter have drawn attention as potentially useful tools. However, there are numerous obstacles to effective use, which this note addresses.

摘要

西方高等教育不断朝更广阔的环境发展, 科技也不断改变学术生活的方方面面, 对外联系在此背景下应运而生。基于大量中国学学者的经验, 本研究纪要将探讨推特 (Twitter) 对个体学者及学术领域的积极作用。在 2016 年3月迎来十周年之际, 推特 (Twitter) 已摆脱充斥明星八卦和空泛热点的早期形象, 并逐渐成为众多中国学研究领域专业人士的工具。众多学者最初持怀疑态度, 如今则基本认可推特 (Twitter) 在从事专业活动时的实用性, 其中包括建立联系网、增加研究知名度、收集和传播资讯,以及建立公众形象。随着对外联系活动逐渐成为西方高校学者的常态, 与推特 (Twitter) 类似的社交媒体作为潜在实用工具已引起一定关注。本研究纪要将探讨影响社交媒体高效使用的若干障碍。

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      China Scholars and Twitter
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      China Scholars and Twitter
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      China Scholars and Twitter
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Berk Ronald. 2010. “How do you leverage the latest technologies, including web 2.0 tools, in your classroom?International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning 6(1), 113.
Blair Alasdair. 2013. “Democratising the learning process: the use of Twitter in the teaching of politics and international relations.” Politics 33(2), 135145.
Dhir Amandeep, Buragga Khalid and Boreqqah Abeer A.. 2013. “Tweeters on campus: Twitter a learning tool in the classroom?Journal of Universal Computer Science 19(5), 672691.
Durose Catherine, and Tonkiss Katherine. 2013. “Fast scholarship is not always good scholarship: relevant research requires more than an online presence.” LSE Impact of Social Sciences, 11 October, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/10/11/fast-scholarship-is-not-always-good-scholarship/ Accessed 7 April 2016.
Evans Chris. 2013. “Twitter for teaching: can social media be used to enhance the process of learning?British Journal of Educational Technology 45(5), 902915.
Gladwell Malcolm. 2010. “Small change,” The New Yorker, 4 October, 42–49.
Gruzd Anatoliy, Staves Kathleen and Wilk Amanda. 2011. “Tenure and promotion in the age of online social media.Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 48(1), 19.
Holmberg Kim, and Thelwall Mike. 2014. “Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication.” Scientometrics 101(2), 1027–42.
Johnson Allen. 2012. “Using Twitter for curated academic content,” 18 November, http://thisisallan.com/2012/11/18/twitterworkflow/. Accessed 7 April 2016.
Lewis Bex, and Rush David. 2013. “Experience of developing Twitter-based communities of practice in higher education.” Research in Learning Technology 21, 113.
Miah Andy. 2013. “Top 5 social media platforms for research development.” LSE Impact of Social Sciences, 26 July, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/07/26/a-to-z-of-social-media-for-academia/. Accessed 7 April 2016.
Priem Jason, and Hemminger Bradley H.. 2010. “Scientometrics 2.0: new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web.” First Monday 15(7), np.
Priem Jason, Piwowar Heather A. and Hemminger Bradley M.. 2012. “Altmetrics in the wild: using social media to explore scholarly impact.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.4745.
Remler Dahlia. 2014. “Are 90% of academic papers really never cited? Reviewing the literature on academic citations.” LSE Impact of Social Sciences, 23 April, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/04/23/academic-papers-citation-rates-remler/. Accessed 7 April 2016.
Sullivan Jonathan. 2012. “A tale of two microblogs in China.” Media, Culture & Society 34(6), 773783.
Sullivan Jonathan. 2014a. “China scholars and the media: improving an awkward, important relationship.” The China Quarterly 220, 1111–22.
Sullivan Jonathan. 2014b. “China's Weibo: is faster different?New Media & Society 16(1), 2437.
Weller Martin. 2011. The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Changing Academic Practice. London: Bloomsbury.
Whitworth Andrew. 2009. Information Obesity. Oxford: Chandos
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The China Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0305-7410
  • EISSN: 1468-2648
  • URL: /core/journals/china-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1237
Total number of PDF views: 1059 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2521 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 7th February 2017 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.