Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 46
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Atherton, Andrew and Newman, Alex 2016. The emergence of the private entrepreneur in reform era China: re-birth of an earlier tradition, or a more recent product of development and change?. Business History, Vol. 58, Issue. 3, p. 319.


    Chan, Kwan Nok and Zhao, Shuang 2016. Punctuated Equilibrium and the Information Disadvantage of Authoritarianism: Evidence from the People's Republic of China. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 134.


    Chen, Geoffrey Chun-fung 2016. Governing Sustainable Energies in China.


    Dau, Magnus and Bräuer, Stephanie 2016. Continuity and Change in China’s Civic Engagement from a ‘State in Society’ Perspective. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,


    Deng, Yixiang Brombal, Daniele Farah, Paolo D. Moriggi, Angela Critto, Andrea Zhou, Yun and Marcomini, Antonio 2016. China's water environmental management towards institutional integration. A review of current progress and constraints vis-a-vis the European experience. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 113, p. 285.


    Li, Xiaojun 2016. Measuring Local Corruption in China: a Cautionary Tale. Journal of Chinese Political Science, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 21.


    Li, Hui Wing-Hung Lo, Carlos and Tang, Shui-Yan 2016. Nonprofit Policy Advocacy under Authoritarianism. Public Administration Review,


    LI, YANWEI KOPPENJAN, JOOP and VERWEIJ, STEFAN 2016. GOVERNING ENVIRONMENTAL CONFLICTS IN CHINA: UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS DO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS COMPROMISE?. Public Administration,


    Liu, Yi Li, Yanwei Xi, Bao and Koppenjan, Joop 2016. A governance network perspective on environmental conflicts in China: findings from the Dalian paraxylene conflict. Policy Studies, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 314.


    Maags, Christina and Holbig, Heike 2016. Replicating Elite Dominance in Intangible Cultural Heritage Safeguarding: The Role of Local Government–Scholar Networks in China. International Journal of Cultural Property, Vol. 23, Issue. 01, p. 71.


    Pohlner, Huw 2016. Institutional change and the political economy of water megaprojects: China’s south-north water transfer. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 38, p. 205.


    Su, Zheng and Meng, Tianguang 2016. Selective responsiveness: Online public demands and government responsiveness in authoritarian China. Social Science Research,


    van Rooij, Benjamin Stern, Rachel E. and Fürst, Kathinka 2016. The authoritarian logic of regulatory pluralism: Understanding China's new environmental actors. Regulation & Governance, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 3.


    Wang, Ju-Han Zoe and Connell, John 2016. Green Watershed in Yunnan: a multi-scalar analysis of environmental non-governmental organisation (eNGO) relationships in China. Australian Geographer, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 215.


    Zhang, Marina Yue 2016. Meso-level factors in technological transitions: The development of TD-SCDMA in China. Research Policy, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, p. 546.


    Zinda, John Aloysius Trac, Christine J. Zhai, Deli and Harrell, Stevan 2016. Dual-function forests in the returning farmland to forest program and the flexibility of environmental policy in China. Geoforum,


    Chien, Shiuh-Shen 2015. Local farmland loss and preservation in China—A perspective of quota territorialization. Land Use Policy, Vol. 49, p. 65.


    Kerr, David 2015. China’s Many Dreams.


    Li, Ji 2015. The Leviathan's RulebyLaw. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 12, Issue. 4, p. 815.


    Plagemann, Johannes and Destradi, Sandra 2015. Soft Sovereignty, Rising Powers, and Subnational Foreign Policy-Making: The Case of India. Globalizations, Vol. 12, Issue. 5, p. 728.


    ×
  • The China Quarterly, Volume 200
  • December 2009, pp. 995-1012

“Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process*

Abstract
Abstract

Traditional analyses of political liberalization in China focus on elections or other facets of democratization. But they cannot account for the fact that although China remains authoritarian, it is nevertheless responsive to the increasingly diverse demands of Chinese society. I argue that the rules of the policy-making process are still captured by the fragmented authoritarianism framework, but that the process has become increasingly pluralized: barriers to entry have been lowered, at least for certain actors (hitherto peripheral officials, non-governmental organizations and the media) identified here as “policy entrepreneurs.” With policy change as the variable of interest, I compare three cases of hydropower policy outcomes. I argue that policy entrepreneurs' ability to frame the issue effectively explains variation in hydropower policy outcomes. I then extend these findings to an unlikely policy area, international trade, specifically, the 2001–06 Sino-EU trade talks over child-resistant lighter safety regulations.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Sidney Tarrow , Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)

Melanie F. Manion , “The electoral connection in the Chinese countryside,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 90, No. 4 (1996), pp. 736–48

M. Kent Jennings , “Political pluralization in the Chinese countryside,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, No. 2 (1997), pp. 361–72

Ching Kwan Lee , “From the specter of Mao to the spirit of the law: labor insurgency in China,” Theory and Society, Vol. 31, No. 2 (2002), pp. 189228

William Hurst , “Understanding contentious collective action by Chinese laid-off workers: the importance of regional political economy,” Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 39, No. 2 (2004), pp. 94120

Arendt Lijphart , “Comparative politics and the comparative method,” The American Political Science Review, No. 65 (1971), pp. 682–93

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The China Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0305-7410
  • EISSN: 1468-2648
  • URL: /core/journals/china-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×