Skip to main content Accessibility help

From Sweden to Singapore: The Relevance of Foreign Models for China's Rise

  • Kai Yang (a1) and Stephan Ortmann (a2)


China can be described as a “learning state” which has adapted to changing conditions and frequently turned outward for lessons. In recent years, Sweden and Singapore have drawn particularly strong interest from Chinese academics because the two countries represent two different “third ways” between Communism and capitalism and have been useful for developing a socialism “with Chinese characteristics.” Sweden is seen to symbolize the ideals of social equity and harmony while Singapore is seen as a model of authoritarian state-capitalism. China's transformation has resembled the Southeast Asia city state's model more than the Scandinavian social democratic model. Since Xi Jinping assumed power in 2012, interest in Sweden has reached a nadir, while attentiveness to Singapore has peaked. Although Chinese state-capitalism faces many challenges, including rising inequality and persistent corruption, it will be difficult to find an alternative role model that can successfully combine one-party rule with economic modernization.

中国可以被视为一个不断适应新形势的 “学习型国家”, 频繁地学习外部经验。近年来, 瑞典和新加坡都引起中国学术界的兴趣, 因为这两个国家分别代表两种区别于共产主义和资本主义的 “第三条道路”, 被认为对 “中国特色” 的社会主义具有启发意义。瑞典被认为是社会公平与和谐的典范, 而新加坡被视为威权型国家资本主义的模范。相对于斯堪的纳维亚式的社会民主模式, 中国的转型更类似于新加坡这个东南亚城市国家的模式。自从习近平 2012 年上台以来, 对瑞典的兴趣降至低点, 而对新加坡的关注则达到高潮。虽然中国的国家资本主义面临很多挑战, 包括贫富分化加剧和腐败横行, 目前很难找到一个替代的模式能像新加坡那样成功地实现一党政治下的经济现代化。


Corresponding author

E-mail: (corresponding author).


Hide All
Arnason, J. Pall. 2005. The Future That Failed: Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model. London: Routledge.
Barr, Michael D. 2000. “Lee Kuan Yew and the ‘Asian values’ debate.” Asian Studies Review 24(3), 309334.
Cai, Dingjian. 2005. “Xiang Xinjiapo xue shenme? (What can you learn from Singapore?)” Zhongguo qingnian bao, Special Monthly Edition 11, 6.
Cai, Dingjian. 2006. “Bei wudu he hulue de Xinjiapo jingyan” (The misinterpreted and ignored Singapore experience), Nanfeng chuang, 20 February,, Accessed 14 August 2016.
Cai, Dingjian. 2009. “Bei wudu de Xinjiapo” (Misinterpreted Singapore), Nanfang News, 16 September, Accessed 15 August 2016.
Cai, Dingjian. 2010. “Xinjiapo shi weiquanzhuyi buzhide zhongguo jiejian” (Singaporean authoritarianism is not worth China's reference), Hebei qingnian bao, 30 November, Accessed 15 August 2016.
Cai, Haoxiang. 2010. “Dr Goh helped shape China's economy: Zhao Ziyang's son,” The Straits Times, 19 May, Accessed 23 March 2017.
Cao, Yunhua. 2016. “Probing the ‘Singapore Fever’ phenomenon in post-1978 China,” presented at the workshop “The ‘Singapore Model’ and Its Influence on China,” City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 9 May 2016.
Chen, Huashan. 1994. “Lun Ruidian jingji moshi” (On the Swedish economic model). Qiushi 6, 4550.
Chen, Lin. 1995. “Geming yu gailiang zhizheng de youlai he yanbian” (The origin and evolution of argumentation between revolutionalism and reformism). Jiangxi shehui kexue 7.
Chu, Jianzhong. 1996. “Ruidian de shiye baozhang zhidu jiqi dui woguo de qishi” (Swedish unemployment welfare system and its implications for China). Nankai guanli pinglun 4, 3034.
Cumings, Bruce 1984. “The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy: Industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequences.” International Organization 38(1), 140.
Deng, Xiaoping. 1992. Deng Xiaoping yu Shenzhen: 1992 Chun (Deng Xiaoping and Shenzhen: Spring 1992). Shenzhen: Haitian Publishing House.
Ding, Jianding. 2003. “20 shiji 80 niandai yilai Ruidian de shehui baozhang zhidu gaige” (Swedish social welfare system reform since 1980s). Guoji luntan 5, 7277.
Dreyer, J. Teufel. 2015. China's Political System. New York: Routledge.
Duus, Peter. 1996. “Imperialism without colonies: the vision of a greater East Asia co-prosperity sphere.” Diplomacy and Statecraft 7(1), 5472.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
Gewirtz, Julian B. 2017. Unlikely Partners: Chinese Reformers, Western Economists, and the Making of Global China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 2013. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
Goh, Chok Tong. 1994. “Social values, Singapore style.” Current History 93(587), 417422.
Gylfason, Thorvaldur, Andersen, Torben M., Honkapohja, Seppo, Isachsen, Arne Jon, and Williamson, John. 1997. The Swedish Model under Stress: A View from the Stands. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
He, Bingmeng. 2008. “Cong ‘Ruidian moshi’ kan Ouzhou shemindang shehui minzhu zhuyi ‘zhuanxing’ de shizhi” (Probing the nature of social democracy “transition” among European social democratic parties by the “Swedish model”). Gaoxiao lilun zhanxian 4, 2021.
He, Qinglian. 2015. “Mantan Zhongguo chaoye dui Xinjiapo moshi de aiyuhen” (China's love and hatred towards the Singapore model), VOA, 23 March, Accessed 14 August 2016.
Ho, Benjamin. 2015. “Learning from Lee: lessons in governance for the middle kingdom from the little red dot.” East Asia 33, 133156.
Holliday, Ian. 2000. “Productivist welfare capitalism: social policy in East Asia.” Political Studies 48(4), 706723.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. “Democracy's third wave.” Journal of Democracy 2(2), 1234.
Huo, Shitao. 1988. “Guanyu Ruidian shehui minzhudang ‘zhongjian daolu’ de ruogan sikao” (Some thoughts on the “middle way” of Swedish social democratic party). In Huang, Anmiao and Zhang, Xiaojin (eds.), Ruidian moshi chutan (Preliminary studies on the Swedish model). Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang People's Publishing House, 184195.
Jansen, Marius B. 1970. The Japanese and Sun Yat-sen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ji, Yun. 2016. “Xinjiapo moshi de liangge zhidian.” (Two pillars of the Singapore model). Lianhe zaobao, 27 June, Accessed 15 August 2016.
Junko, Oikawa. 2016. “China's social divisions and the search for a common ‘baseline’.” The Tokyo Foundation, 15 August, Accessed 20 August 2016.
Kraar, Louis, and Yew, Lee Kuan. 1997. “A blunt talk with Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew: he's a model for China and the New Hong Kong, but he insists that ‘My job is not to be an example to anybody’,” Fortune, 4 August, Accessed 10 June 2012.
Lee, Kuan Yew. 1993. Li Guangyao sishinian zhenglun xuan (Lee Kuan Yew's Political Writings of 40 Years). Beijing: Xiandai Chubanshe.
Lee, Kuan Yew. 2000. From Third World to First: The Singapore Story, 1965–2000. Singapore: Singapore Press Holdings.
Lee, Kuan Yew. 2010. “Eulogy by Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew,” The Straits Times, 23 May, Accessed 18 August 2016.
Li, He. 2002. “The role of think tanks in Chinese foreign policy.” Problems of Post-Communism 49(2), 3343.
Li, He. 2015. Political Thought and China's Transformation: Ideas Shaping Reform in Post-Mao's China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lim, Kean Fan. 2014. “‘Socialism with Chinese characteristics’: uneven development, variegated neoliberalization and the dialectical differentiation of state spatiality.” Progress in Human Geography 38(2), 221247.
Lindbeck, Assar. 1997. “The Swedish experiment.” Journal of Economic Literature 35(3), 12731319.
Liu, Jianshe. 1990. “Minzhu shehui zhuyi de ‘Ruidian moshi’ pingxi” (On democratic socialism and the “Swedish model”). Xuaxiao dangjian yu sixiang jiaoyu 3, 3336.
Liu, Xirui, and Duan, Longfei. 2004. “Fuwuxing zhengfu: benzhi jiqi lilun jichu (Service oriented government: nature and theoretical foundation.” Guojia xingzheng xueyuan xuebao 5, 2529.
Liu, Zhonghua. 2004. “Ruidian moshi: zhongjie yihuo xinsheng.” (Swedish model: to die or to be reborn,” Renmin ribao, 7 January, Accessed 29 March 2017.
Lye, Liang Fook. 2016. “Singapore's role in China's reform process: an institutional approach.” Paper presented at the workshop “The ‘Singapore Model’ and Its Influence on China,” Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong, 9 April.
Meidner, Rudolf. 1992. “The rise and fall of the Swedish model.” Studies in Political Economy 39(1), 159171.
Miao, Shubin, and Wen, Chen. 2004. “Beiou moshi: zhengfu zhineng zhuanbian he zhidu anpai-fenlan, Ruidian, danmai sanguo kaocha” (North European model: government function transformation and institutional arrangement-field trip report on Finland, Sweden and Denmark). Gaige fazhan yanjiu yuan, January, Accessed 17 August 2016.
Misra, Kalpana. 2003. “Neo-left and neo-right in post-Tiananmen China.” Asian Survey 43(5), 717744.
Nathan, Andrew. 2003. “Authoritarian resilience.” Journal of Democracy 14(1), 617.
Naughton, Barry. 2017. “Is China Socialist?Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(1), 324.
Ortmann, Stephan, and Thompson, Mark R.. 2014. “China's obsession with Singapore: learning authoritarian modernity.” The Pacific Review 27(3), 433455.
Ortmann, Stephan, and Thompson, Mark. R.. 2016. “China and the ‘Singapore model’.” Journal of Democracy 27(1), 3945.
Pan, Peixin. 1988. “Ruidian shehui minzhudang yu tuoxie zhengzhi.” (Swedish social democratic party and compromise politics). In Anmiao, Huang and Xiaojin, Zhang (eds.), Ruidian moshi chutan. Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang People's Publishing House, 144157.
Pan, Wei. (ed.) 2009. Zhongguo moshi: Jiedu Zhonghua renmin gongheguo liushinian (A new development model: from the sixty years of the People's Republic). Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press.
Przeworski, Adam. 2004. “Democracy and economic development.” In Mansfield, Edward D. and Sisson, R. (eds.), The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Democracy, Autonomy, and Conflict in Comparative and International Politics. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 300324.
Quah, Jon. S.T. 1998. “Singapore's model of development? Is it transferable?” In Rowen, Henry S. (ed.), Behind East Asian Growth: The Political and Social Foundations of Prosperity. London: Routledge, 105125.
Ramesh, M. 2000. “The Politics of Social Security in Singapore.” The Pacific Review 13(2), 243256.
Roy, Denny. 1994. “Singapore, China, and the ‘soft authoritarian challenge’.” Asian Survey 34(3), 231242.
Rozman, Gilbert. 2010. “Concluding assessment: the Soviet impact on Chinese society.” Bernstein, Thomas P. and Li, Hua-Yu (eds.), China Learns from the Soviet Union, 1949–Present. Plymouth: Lexington, 513520.
Rozman, Gilbert. 2014. The Chinese Debate about Soviet Socialism, 1978–1985. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sautman, Barry. 1992. “Sirens of the strongman: neo-authoritarianism in recent Chinese political theory.” The China Quarterly 129, 72102.
Shambaugh, David. 2008. China's Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Shambaugh, David. 2016. “Contemplating China's future.” The Washington Quarterly 39(3), 121130.
Shen, Zhihua. 2015. Sulian zhuanjia zai Zhongguo (1948–1960) (Soviet Experts in China (1948–1960)) (third edition). Beijing: Social Science Academic Press.
Song, Xinning. 2010. “‘European models’ and their implications to China: internal and external perspectives.” Review of International Studies 36(3), 755775.
Stan, Ken. 2012. “Jiemi zhongguo haiwai guanyuan peixun.” (Unveiling Chinese cadre overseas trainings). Zhongwen wang, 6 November, Accessed 13 August 2016.
Steinhardt, Christoph, and Zhao, Litao. 2015. “From ‘stability overrides everything’ to ‘social governance’: the evolving approach of social order in China.” In Yongnian, Zheng and Gore, Lance L.P. (eds.), China Entering the Xi Jinping Era. Abingdon: Routledge, 193216.
Sun, Jingfeng. 2002. “Jiaqiang dui Xinjiapo renming xingdongdang de yanjiu” (Studies on Singapore People's Action Party should increase). Henan shifan daxue xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban) 29(3), 2528.
Sun, Jinhua, and Da, Bangyin. 2009. “Lun Zhongguo Tese Shehui Zhuyi yu Ruidian Minzhu Shehui Zhuyi de Genben Qubie” (The fundamental difference between socialism with Chinese characteristics and Swedish democratic socialism). Jingji yanjiu daokan 31, 201–02.
Sun, Yang. 2014. “‘Xinjiapo moshi’ de lingyimian” (The other side of the “Singapore model”). Fenghuang zhoukan, 12 November, Accessed 13 August 2016.
Thompson, Mark. R. 2010. “Japan's German path and Pacific Asia's flying geese.” Asian Journal of Social Science 38(5), 697715.
Wang, Tingyou. 2008. “Ying ruhe kandai Ruidian shehuiminzhudang ji Ruidian moshi” (How to interpret Swedish Social Democratic Party and Swedish model). Lilun tantao 4, 5359.
White, Gordon, and Goodman, Roger. 1998. “Welfare orientalism and the search for an East Asian welfare model.” In Goodman, Roger, White, Gordon and Kwon, Huck-ju (eds.), The East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State. London: Routledge, 324.
Wu, Jinsheng. 2012. Xi Jinping he Xinjiapo Moshi (Xi Jinping and Singapore model). Hong Kong: Tujing Press.
Xiang, Wenhua. 1999. Sikandinaweiya minzhu shehui zhuyi yanjiu (Research on Democratic Socialism in Scandinavia). Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press.
Xiang, Wenhua, and Xuemei, Li. 2002. “20 Shiji 90 Niandai Ruidian, Yingguo de Shehui Fuli Zhidu Gaige” (Social welfare system reform in Sweden and Britain in 1990s). Guoji luntan 4, 7277.
Xie, Tao. 2007. “Minzhu shehui zhuyi moshi yu Zhongguo qiantu.” (Democratic socialist model and China's future). Yanhuang chunqiu 2, 18.
Xinhua. 2007. “Lin Zexu-jindai zhongguo ‘kaiyan kanshijie diyiren’.” (Lin Zexu: the first person who opened his eyes and looked at the world), Xinhua wang, 1 January, Accessed 13 August 2016.
Xinhua. 2015. “Xinjiapo wei zhongguo tigong ‘yangben’.” (Singapore provides references for China), Xinhua wang, 30 November, Accessed 15 August 2016.
Xu, Chongwen. 2007. “Ruidian moshi de lishi jincheng he jingyan jiaoxun.” (The historical transition and lessons of Swedish model). Fudan xuebao (shehui kexue ban) 4, 1524.
Yan, Chen, and Qingguan, Xu. 2013. “Zengqiang ‘Mao Zedong sixiang he zhongguo tese shehui zhuyi lilun tixi gailun’ ke shishaoxing de tansuo.” (To enhance the effectiveness of: “Introduction to Mao Ze-dong Thought and Theoretical System of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics”). Jaimusi jiaoyu xueyuan xuebao 9(2), 3, 8.
Yang, Qixian. 2003. “Yipian chidao de kaocha jiyao: Ruidian shehui zhuyi kaocha” (A postponed field trip report on Swedish socialism). Lilun cankao 1, 4245.
Yang, Xiaming. 2007. “Zhongguo shijiaoxia de ‘Ruidian moshi’.” (Swedish model from China's perspective). Shehui zhuyi yanjiu 1, 136–38.
Yu, Mingkun. 2011. “Zhongguo de ‘Xinjiapo Re’ xiangxiang yanjiu.” (On ‘Singapore fever’ in China). Master thesis, Jinan University.
Yuan, Gangong. 2015. “Zhongguo zenyang xuexi ‘Xinjiapo moshi’.” (How China learns from the “Singapore model”), Helanonline, 30 March, Accessed 15 August 2016.
Yuan, Qun. 2009. “Ruidianshi shehui zhuyi yu Zhongguo tese shehui zhuyi zhi bijiao” (Comparison between Swedish socialism and socialism with Chinese characteristics). Anhui jingguan zhiye xueyuan xuebao 5, 7678.
Yuan, Xia. 1996. “Shehui zhuyi moshi duanxiang” (Some thoughts on the socialist model). Shehui zhuyi yanjiu 1, 67.
Zhang, Benyan. 2012. “Jinnianlai guonei Ruidian minzhu shehui zhuyi moshi yanjiu shuping” (Summary of the domestic study on the model of democratic socialism in Sweden in recent years). Tianshui xingzheng xueyuan xuebao 1, 2831.
Zhang, Chuanhe. 2009. “Ruidian Shehui Minzhudang zhengji he Ruidian chenggong yinsu xinjie” (The achievements of SAP and new interpretations for its success). Kexue shehui zhuyi 1, 132–36.
Zhang, Ping, and Sun, Min. 1994. Ruidian-Shehui Fuli Jingji de Dianfan (Paragon of Social Welfare Economy). Wuhan: Wuhan Publishing House.
Zhang, Shuangshuang. 2011. “Zhengque renshi minzhu shehui zhuyi de ‘Ruidian moshi’.” (Correctly understanding the democratic socialist “Swedish model”). Lilun jie 6, 6768.
Zhao, Suisheng. 1997. “Chinese intellectuals’ quest for national greatness and nationalistic writing in the 1990s.” The China Quarterly 152, 725745.
Zhao, Suisheng. 2004. A Nation-State by Construction: Dynamics of Modern Chinese Nationalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zheng, Dahua. 2006. “Guanyu weiyuan de ‘shiyi changji yi zhiyi’.” (On Wei Yuan's “learning merits from the foreign to conquer the foreign”). Renmin ribao, 14 February, Accessed 13 August 2016.
Zheng, Yongnian. 2004. Globalization and State Transformation in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zheng, Yongnian. 2007. “Zhongguo weishenme dui minzhu shehui zhuyi ganxingqu” (Why China is interested in democratic socialism), Caogen, 16 October, Accessed 25 August 2016.
Zheng, Yongnian. 2010. “Zhongguo yao cong Xinjiapo moshi xue shenme” (What does China want to learn from the Singapore model?). Zhongguo baodao 7, 5055.
Zhu, Wenliang. 2007. “On the thought of ‘learning merits from the foreign to conquer the foreign’.” Master's thesis, Xiangtan University.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

From Sweden to Singapore: The Relevance of Foreign Models for China's Rise

  • Kai Yang (a1) and Stephan Ortmann (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.