No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Second Rise and Fall of Teng Hsiao-p'ing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2009
Extract
The delivery of the eulogy on Premier Chou En-lai by Vice-premier Teng Hsiaa-p'ing at the memorial service held in Peking on 15 January was described by one China-watching correspondent as “ an impressive demonstration that he is now in charge in China,” As is well known, that was the occasion of Teng’s last official appearance – last, this is, unless his career were to take one more unexpected turn. If subsequent developments caught that correspondent by surprise, he had much company – in official as well as in non-official circles. Indeed, well-placed commentators have asserted that on the occasion of his most recent visit to China, Dr Kissinger had been assured on the highest authority that Teng Hsiao-p’ing would remain in power after Chou En-lai’se xpected demise. Dr Kissinger’s trip to China took place in December 1975, the highest authority in China is Mao Tse-tung, and Dr Kissinger had accompanied President Ford on the occasion of his call on Chairman Mao.
- Type
- Chinese Politics 1973-76
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The China Quarterly 1976
References
1. New York Times, 16 and 18 April 1976.
2. See John Bryan Starr, “ China in 1975: ‘ The Wind in the Bell Tower,” Asian Survey, January 1976, pp. 43–46.
3. With the honoured guest seated at Mao’s immediate right, the next seat beyond is the appropriate one for Mao’s ranking subordinate because it puts him in the best position to hear all that is said, thus facilitating his taking responsibility for any action arising from the conversation. Sometimes, of course, the seating arrangement may be altered to accommodate interpreters or additional guests, or for other reasons of protocol or convenience.
4. Rice, Edward E., Mao’s Way (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972), pp. 239–40.Google Scholar
5. Current Background, No. 891 (8 October 1969), p. 71.
6. Khrushchev Remembers: The Last Testament (New York: Little, Brown, 1974), p. 253.Google Scholar
7. Joseph Lelyveld, “ Resurrection in China,” New York Times Magazine, 30 November 1975, p. 101.
8. Edward E. Rice, “The campaign to criticize Lin Piao and Confucius,” Pacific Community, October 1974, p. 103.
9. Current Scene, December 1972 (chart), and April 1976, p. 16.
10. New York Times, 10 January 1976.
11. See Parris Chang, “Political profiles: Wang Hung-wen and Li Teh-sheng,” The China Quarterly, No. 57 (1974), pp. 128–31; and New York Times, 27 January 1975.
12. Peking Review, 24 January 1975, p. 11; and New York Times, 29 January 1975.
13. Peking Review, 9 April 1976, pp. 6–7.