Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:35:03.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Alexandrian Christianity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Rorert M. Grant
Rorert M. Grant
Affiliation:
Mr. Grant is professor of New Testament and Early Christianity in the Divinity School of theUniversity of Chicago.His paper was first delivered as the Presidential Address at the dinner meeting of The American Society of Church History on December 29, 1970 in Boston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nearly everything that is recorded about the early history of Alexandrian Christianity lies in the Church History of Eusebius. Many Alexandrian theological writings are preserved, but as might be expected they cast little light on historical events. Now the basic difficulty with Eusebius' work is that it has to be classified as “official history.” It therefore contains a judicious mixture of authentic record with a good deal of suppression of fact and occasional outright lies. He wrote it in defence of himself and his friends and their outlook toward the nascent imperial church establishment under God's messenger Constantine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 1971 , pp. 133 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gringoire (30 April 1937), 17. I am grateful to Mr. David Kahn for the use of microfilms of these articles.

2. HE VI 23, 4Google Scholar; 33, 4; 36, 4.

3. Ibid., VI 39, 5 (594, 16 Schwartz); cf. p. 517, 8 (manuscripts E and R). For teleutē = death, cf. II 23, 3; III 31, 1.4; IV 15, 47; VI 2, 15.

4. Cf. Bieler, L., Theios Anēr (Wien, 1935-1936)Google Scholar; Koch, Hal in Pauly-Wissowa, , RE, XVIII (1942), 1036–40Google Scholar; Hornschuh, G. in ZKG, 71 (1960), 1–25. 193–214.Google Scholar

5. HE VI 21, 3–4Google Scholar; cf. Herzog, G. in Pauly-Wissowa, , RE X 421.Google Scholar

6. HE VI 31, 2Google Scholar; for Africanus cf. Routh, M. J., Reliquiae saorae (ed. 2, Oxford, 1846), II, 287 (frag. 39).Google Scholar

7. Demetrius: Jerome, , C. Rufin. II 18Google Scholar (PL 23, 461); Ambrose: Jerome, Ep. 84, 10 (CSEL 55, 132–33); census: Hombert, M. — Préaux, C., Recherohes sur le recensement dans l'Egypte romaine (Papyrologica Lugduno-Batava 5, Leiden, 1952), 76–84.Google Scholar

8. Epiphanius, , Haer. 64, 13, 12Google Scholar. For the use of drugs by M. Aurelius cf. Africa, T. W. in Journal of the History of Ideas, 22 (1961), 97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Witke, E. C. in Classical Philology, 60 (1965), 23–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Epiphanius, , Haer. 64, 2, 2–5.Google Scholar

10. Jerome, , Ep. 33, 5Google Scholar (CSEL 54, 259).

11. Reinmuth, O. W. in Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists, 4 (1967), 106–9Google Scholar; also Barnes, T. D. in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 74 (1970), 313–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. HE II 16–17.

13. Ibid., IV 2, 1–3.

14. Ibid., IV 7, 3.

15. Diog. Laert. I 21; cf. Clement, , Str. I 37, 6.Google Scholar

16. Dodds, E. B. in Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique V (Geneve, 1960), 32.Google Scholar

17. Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum (Tübingen, 1934), 49–64.Google Scholar

18. Clement, , Str. I 150, 4Google Scholar; Origen, , C. Cels. I 15Google Scholar; IV 51; V 38, 57.

19. Dial. 5, 6.

20. Eusebius, , HE IV 7, 7.Google Scholar

21. Str. II 114, 2.Google Scholar

22. Ibid., VI 53, 5.

23. Ibid., I 61, 4; IV 9, 1; Diog. Laert. I 15; VIII 2; Porphyry, , Vit. Pyth. 1Google Scholar; Iamblichus, , De vit. pyth. 9.Google Scholar

24. Adv. haer. I 25 (pp. 208–10 Harvey).Google Scholar

25. Ibid., I 1, 1 (p. 9); II 14, 5 (p. 299). For Pythagorean influence on Gnostics elsewhere cf. Carcopino, J., De Pythagore aux apôtres (Paris, 1956), esp. 99–221.Google Scholar

26. Text in Bardy, G., Revue biblique 51 (1942), 81–82.Google Scholar

27. HE V 10, 1–3.Google Scholar

28. Filliozat, J. in Revue de l'histoire des religions, 130 (1945), 59–91.Google Scholar

29. Zeitschrift für Kircheageschichte, 61 (1942), 136–70.Google Scholar

30. Abhandlungen … Mains, 1951 (no. 3), 173–202.Google Scholar

31. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1902), 377–415.Google Scholar

32. Fragments 9a-b Leemans = Eusebius, Praep. cv. IX 7 and Origen, , C. Cels. I 15.Google Scholar

33. Vit. Apolon. VIII 7 (cf. VI 15).Google Scholar

34. Str. I 71, 6Google Scholar; cf. Méhat, A., Étude sur lea ‘Stromates’ de Clément d'Alexandrie (Paris, 1966), 44–45.Google Scholar

35. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 77 (1957), 71–73Google Scholar; also in Aufsätze zur Gnosis (Abhandlungen …Gottingen III 69, 1967), 157–61.Google Scholar

36. Chadwick, H., The Sentences of Sextus (Cambridge, 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37. Str. I 72, 4Google Scholar; 100, 3 (so also to Numenius, I 150, 4).

38. Str. VI, c. 15; Delatte, A., Études sur la littérature pythagoricienne (Paris, 1915), 231–45.Google Scholar

39. Str. V 27, 2–31, 2.Google Scholar

40. Ecl. proph. 32.

41. Str. I 66, 2Google Scholar; cf. den Boer, W., De allegorese in het werk van Clemens Alexandrinus (Leiden, 1940), 67.Google Scholar

42. Str. I 66, 2Google Scholar; 69, 1. 6; 70, 1; VI 57, 2.

43. Ibid., I 150, 3.

44. Ibid., IV 9, 1.

45. Paed. II 11, 1.Google Scholar

46. Str. VII 32, 5Google Scholar (cf. Diog. Laert. VIII 13; Iamblichus, , De vit. pyth. 25, 35)Google Scholar; Sextus, Sent. 46; Pyth. Sent. 66.

47. Origène et la philosophie (Paris, 1962), 49.Google Scholar

48. HE VI 19, 8.Google Scholar

49. HE VI 19, 13Google Scholar; cf. Nautin, P., Lettres et éorivains chrétiens des iie et iie siécles (Paris, 1961), 126–34.Google Scholar

50. Porphyry, , Vit. Plot. 3, 24–27 Henry-Sehwyzer.Google Scholar

51. Dial. 2, 4.

52. HE VI 18, 3.Google Scholar

53. Ibid., VI 15.

54. Histoire de l'éducation dans l'antiquité (ed. 2, Paris, 1950), 524 (note 5).Google Scholar

55. Genethliakon für C. Robert (Berlin, 1910), 122–127.Google Scholar

56. Crouzel, H., Grégoire is Thaumaturge: Remeroiement à Origns (Paris, 1969), 188Google Scholar (Letter of Origen, 1, 15–16); 142 (Pan. 113–14). Ancient: Pan. 139. 151. 160; modern (= Stoic), 124. 160; scripture: Pan. 173–74.

57. Pan. 1–3.

58. Iamblichus, , De vit. pyth. 72.Google Scholar

59. Op. cit., 18–20.

60. Pan. 141; cf. Courcelle, P. in Settimane di Studio del Centro Italiano di studi sull'Alto Medioevo IX (Spoleto, 1962), 265–95Google Scholar; a minor correction on Philo, Migr. 8: Nazzaro, A. V. in Rivista di filologia, 98 (1970), 188–92Google Scholar; see now for hermetic usage Betz, H. D. in Harvard Theological Review, 63 (1970), 465–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61. Virtues: Pan. 122; lamblichus 167ff., 187ff., 214ff.; friendship: Pan. 81. 89–92; Iamblichus 101–2. 229. 240.

62. Pan. 7. 58–62; cf. Schemmel, F. in Philologische Wochenschrift, 45 (1925), 1278.Google Scholar

63. Koetsehau, P., Des Gregorios Thaumaturgos Dankrede an Origenes (Freiburg—Leipzig, 1894), xi–xii.Google Scholar

64. Pan. 192–93.

65. Ibid., 7.

66. C.Cels. I 7Google Scholar. Clement too mentioned the two groups (Str. V 59, 1Google Scholar), though he noted that other schools had esoteric doctrines; he also mentioned the ipse dixit (II 24, 3).

67. C. Cels. I 15Google Scholar; cf. Josephus, , C. Apion. I 162–65.Google Scholar

68. On the question of the philosophical emphasis of the school at Caesarea cf. Knauber, A. in Münchener Theologische Zeitsckrift, 19 (1968), 182–203Google Scholar; he contrasts Gregory's description with “die retrospektiv konstruierte innerkirchliche Deutung” in Eusebius.

69. Eusebius, , Praep. ev. XIV 23, 1.Google Scholar

70. Dio Cassius 77, 7, 3.

71. HE VII 32, 20Google Scholar (Anatolius = VII 32, 6–21).

72. Heiberg, J. L. in Annales internationales d'histoire. Congrès de Paris, 1900. 5e section (Paris, 1901), 27–41.Google Scholar

73. HE VII 32, 14–19Google Scholar; cf. Grumel, V. in Mélanges E. Tisserant II (Studi e Testi 232, 1964), 217–40.Google Scholar

74. Cf. H.I., Marrou in Momigliano, A. (ed.), The Conflict Between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century (Oxford, 1963), 126–50.Google Scholar

75. On him cf. After the New Testament (Philadelphia, 1967), 78–80.Google Scholar

76. HE VII 6; 24–25Google Scholar.

77. Ibid., VII 32, 31; VIII 13, 7; IX 6, 2.

78. Ibid., VII 32, 30.

79. Theodoret, , HE I 1, 18Google Scholar; Sozomen, , HE I 15Google Scholar; cf. Telfer, W. in Analecta Bollandiana, 67 (1949), 117–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

80. Eusebius, , HE V 22; VI 26.Google Scholar

81. Ibid., VI 2, 2.

82. Ibid., VI 3, 7.

83. Reitzenstein, R. in Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie… 1914, no. 8Google Scholar; cf. Festugière, A. J. in Revue des études grecques, 50 (1937), 478CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dörries, H. in Naehrichten der Akademie der Wisaenschaften in Göttingen, Philos.Hist. Kl. 1949, 357–410Google Scholar; Dodds, E. R., Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety (Cambridge, 1965), 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

84. For these points cf. Porphyry, , vit. Pyth. 1 (17, 10–13 Nauck)Google Scholar. 11–12 (23, 1–6); Iamblichus, , De vit. pyth. 9 (8, 6–13 Deubner).Google Scholar

85. lambliehus 69 (89, 3); cf. 13 (10, 11–14). 27 (16, 8).

86. Op. cit., 430 (cf. 527–60).

87. Photius, , Bibl. cod. 109Google Scholar in Stählin, O., Clemens Alexandrinus III 202 (frag. 23).Google Scholar

88. C. Celsum I 32 (tr. H. Chadwick).Google Scholar

89. Frag. 10 Leemans = Clement, , Str. I 150, 4.Google Scholar

90. Revue d'histoire ecclésiastque, 19 (1923), 481–506; 20 (1924), 5–37Google Scholar; cf. also my chapter in The Crucible of Christianity (ed. A. Toynbee, London, 1969), 318–30.Google Scholar