Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-01T14:12:41.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Catholic Historiography: A Post-Conciliar Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

David J. O'Brien
David J. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Professor of History, Loyola College, Montreal, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Papers on historiography, reviewing and assessing recent literature in a particular field, have become commonplace and no one questions their value or utility. A report of this sort would be useful today on the subject of American Catholicism for, in the ten years since Henry J. Browne last surveyed the field, a number of high quality monographs have appeared. Nevertheless there is a second type of historiographical analysis more relevant today. Historiography can be seen as a category of intellectual history which relates historical works to the periods in which they were written and attempts to uncover their basic assumptions, revealing more immediately the limitations of the historical discipline, suggesting new questions to be asked, new avenues to be explored, new techniques, new metaphors, new models to be utilized. Bernard Weisberger's well known article, “The Dark and Bloody Ground of Reconstruction Historiography,” for example, pointed out the influence of changing social conditions and intellectual fashions on historical views of the reconstruction period and suggested new questions and modes of interpretation arising quite self-consciously out of the needs and anxieties of the present.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 1968 , pp. 80 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For example: Ellis, John Tracy, Catholics in Colonial America (Baltimore, 1965)Google Scholar; Metzger, Charles H., Catholics and the American Revolution (Chicago, 1962)Google Scholar; McGloin, John B., S.J., California's First Archbishop (New York, 1966)Google Scholar; Sweeney, David F., O.F.M., The Life of John Lancaster Spalding (New York, 1965)Google Scholar; McAvoy, Thomas T., O.S.C., The Great Crisis in American Catholic History (Chicago, 1957)Google Scholar; Cross, Robert D., The Emergence of Liberal Catholicism in America (Cambridge, 1958)Google Scholar; Abell, Aaron I, American Catholicism and Social Action (Garden City, 1960)Google Scholar; Broderick, Francis L., The Right Reverend New Dealer: John A. Ryan (New York, 1963)Google Scholar; Tull, Charles, Father Coughlin and the New Deal (Syracuse, 1965)Google Scholar; Marx, Paul B., OSB, Virgil Michel and the Liturgical Movement (Collegeville, 1957)Google Scholar; Hennesey, James, S.J., The First Council of the Vatican: The American Experience (New York, 1963).Google Scholar

2. Weisberger, Bernard, “The Dark and Bloody Ground of Reconstruction Historiography,” Journal of Southern History, XXV (11 1959), 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Mead, Sidney E., “Church History Explained,” Church History XXXII (03 1963), 18–19.Google Scholar

4. Niebuhr, H. Richard, The Kingdom of God in America, Torchbook, Harper (New York, 1959), XV.Google Scholar

5. Mead, op. cit., 23; White, Hayden V., “The Burden of History,” History and Theory, (Spring 1966), 111–134.Google Scholar

6. Hofstadter, Richard, The Age of Reform (New York, 1956)Google Scholar; Anti-Intellecutalism in America (New York, 1962)Google Scholar; The Paranoid Style in American Politics and other Essays (New York, 1966).Google Scholar

7. May, Henry F., “The Revival of American Religious History,” American Historical Review, LXX (10 1964), 90.Google Scholar

8. Browne, Henry J., “American Catholic History: A Progress Report on Research and Study,” Church History, XXVI (12 1957), 372–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Clark, Hubert J., Conv, O.F.M.., “Seventy-Five Years of American Church History,” American Ecclesiastical Review CLI (08 1964), 73–96.Google Scholar

9. Quoted by Guilday, Peter, The Life and Times of John England (New York, 1927) II, 498–499.Google Scholar

10. McManamin, Francis G., “American Bishops and the American Electorate,” American Ecclesiastical Review, CLI (10, 1964) 217–229Google Scholar supports the bishops' right to speak on moral issues in politics by listing a number of examples of episcopal action in the United States.

11. Stedman, Murray S. Jr, Religion and Politics in America (New York, 1964)Google Scholar, Odegard, Peter, ed., Religion and Politics (New Brunswick, 1960).Google Scholar

12. Pastoral Letter of 1866 in Guilday, Peter, ed., The National Pastorals of the American Hierarchy (Westminster, 1954), 206.Google Scholar

13. Guilday, , A History of the Council of Baltimore (1791–1884) (New York, 1932) 182.Google Scholar

14. Ellis, , American Catholicism (Chicago, 1955), 92.Google Scholar

15. Moynahan, Daniel P., “The Irish,” in Moynahan, and Glazer, Nathan, ed., Beyond the Melting Pot (Cambridge, 1963), pp. 217–287Google Scholar; Levine, Edward M., The Irish and Irish Politicians, (Notre Dame, 1967)Google Scholar; Lubell, Samuel, The Future of American Politics (New York, 1951)Google Scholar; Lenski, Gerhard, The Religious Factor (New York, 1961)Google Scholar; Benson, Lee, The Concept of Jacksonian Democracy. New York as a Test Case (Princeton, 1961)Google Scholar; Hays, Samuel P., “The Social Analysis of Political History, 1880–1920,” Political Science Quarterly, LXXX (09 1965) 373–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Huthmacher, Joseph J.Massachusetts: People and Politics (Cambridge, 1959).Google Scholar

16. Gabriel, Ralph, The Course of American Democratic Thought (New York, 1956).Google Scholar

17. Cross, Robert D., “The Changing Image of the City Among American Catholics,” Catholic Historical Review, XLVIII (04 1962), 33–52Google Scholar; Guttmann, Allen, The Wound in the Heart (New York, 1962), ch. 3Google Scholar. For a useful discussion of the historical study of attitudes see Filene, Peter, “American Attitudes Toward Soviet Russia, 1917–1933,” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1964, introduction.Google Scholar

18. Cross, Robert D., “Rewriting American Catholic History,” The Commonweal, LXXIX (12 13, 1963), 351–352.Google Scholar

19. “American Catholics and the Intellectual Life,” Thought, XXX (Autumn 1955), 351–388.Google Scholar

20. Guilday, Peter, England, I, vii–viiiGoogle Scholar; Melville, Annabelle M., John Carroll of Baltimore (New York, 1955), 286–287.Google Scholar

21. Pastoral Letter of 1884 in Guilday, , Pastorals, 234–5.Google Scholar

22. Guilday, Peter, “The Catholic Church ha the United States,” Thought, I (06 1926), 7.Google Scholar

23. Joseph F. Contanzo, S.J., “Religious Heritage of American Democracy,” Ibid., XXX (Winter 1955–1956), 488–489.

24. Quoted by Moynihan, James H., The Life of Archbishop John Ireland (New York, 1953), 35.Google Scholar

25. Guilday, , The Life and Times of John Carroll (Westminster, 1954), 773.Google Scholar

26. This theme is present in the work of most American Catholic historians, but is most clearly associated with Father Thomas T. McAvoy, C.S.C. While insisting that the minority thesis merely means that Catholics were not the most numerous and had religious differences with their neighbors, Father McAvoy regards recognition of these facts as the key to American Catholic self-understanding. See “American Catholics: Tradition and Controversy,” Thought, XXXV (Winter 1960), 583–600Google Scholar; “The American Catholic Dilemma,” Review of Politics, XX (04 1959), 456–60Google Scholar, and numerous other articles.

27. Mead, op. cit., 24; Trinterud, L. J., “The Task of the American Church Historian,” Church History, XXV (03 1956), 10.Google Scholar

28. Daniel Callahan, utilizing the researches of MeAvoy and others, focused attention on the heavily institutional emphasis of American Catholic history in his The Mind of the Catholic Layman (New York, 1963).Google Scholar

29. O'Brien, David J., “American Catholic Social Thought in the 1930s,” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester, 1965.Google Scholar

30. Callahan, op. cit.; Ong, , Frontiers in American Catholicism (New York, 1957)Google Scholar and American Catholic Crossroads (New York, 1959)Google Scholar; Greeley, , The Hesitant Pilgrim (New York, 1966), ch. 2Google Scholar; SisterBland, Joan, S.N.D. “The New Dimension in United States Catholic History,” Records, American Catholic Historical Society of Philadelphia, LXXIII (03, 1962), 3–9.Google Scholar

31. See for example Blied, Benjamin J., Catholics and the Civil War (Milwaukee, 1945), ch. 2.Google Scholar

32. Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition in America (New York, 1955)Google Scholar; Hofstadter, Richard, The American Political Tradition (New York, 1958)Google Scholar; Potter, David, People of Plenty (Chicago, 1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Curley, Michael J., “Deeper Study of Catholic Immigration Needed,” Records. American Catholic Historical Society of Philadelphia, LXXXIX (03–12 1958), 56–62Google Scholar. Greene, Victor R., “The Ordeal of Minority Consciousness. The Polish and Lithuanian Case, 1870–1912,” Unpublished paper delivered at American Historical Association meeting December, 1966Google Scholar, for a suggestive discussion of internal conflicts within minority groups generating ethnic self-consciousness; Gleason, Philip, “The Melting Pot: Symbol of Fusion or Confusion,” American Quarterly, XVI (Spring 1964), 20–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Moynihan, and Glazer, , Beyond the Melting Pot, p. vi.Google Scholar

34. Shannon, William V., The American Irish (New York, 1963)Google Scholar; Broehl, Wayne G., The Molly Maguires (Cambridge, 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35. Elkins, Stanley and McKitrick, Eric, “Institutions in Motion,” American Quarterly, XII (Summer 1960), 190–191.Google Scholar

36. Daniel Callahan, op. cit.; Novak, Michael, “American Catholicism After the Council,” Commentary, XL (08 1965), 50–65Google Scholar. Leo, John, “Thinking It Over,” National Catholic Reporter, 09 28, 1966.Google Scholar

37. Hudson, Winthrop, The Great Tradition of the American Churches (New York, 1953), 20.Google Scholar

38. James H. Smylie has studied one example of this, uncovering a good deal of material to support the conclusion that Catholic spokesmen before 1928 had been unable to explain American Catholic experiences in such a way as to allay Protestant fears based on papal pronouncements. “The Roman Catholic Church, the State and Al Smith,” Church History, XXIX (09 1960), 321–343.Google Scholar

39. See for example Griffin, Clifford S., “Converting the Catholics. American Benevolent Societies and the Crusade Against the Church,” Cathoiic Historical Review, XLVII (10 1961), 325–341Google Scholar; Kinzer, Donald L.An Episode in Anti-Catholicism: The American Protective Association (Seattle, 1964).Google Scholar

40. Kinzer, op. cit., 32, 127.

41. May, op. cit., 91.

42. John, XXIII, Mater et Magestra, America press edition (New York, 1961), 50.Google Scholar

43. Browne, Henry J., “A History of the Catholic Church in the United States,” in Putz, Louis, C.S.C., ed., The Catholic Church, U.S.A. (Chicago, 1956), 35Google Scholar. Monsignor Ellis, whose essay on Catholics and the intellectual life has been mentioned, has also drawn attention to the Church's long standing neglect of the Negro. “Contemporary American Catholicism in the Light of History,” The Critic, XXIV (06–07 1966), 8–19Google Scholar. In the same essay he describes Catholic support for religious freedom and for the aspirations of the workingman as the two major strengths of American Catholicism. The extent and character of that support, and the arguments used to sustain it, are among the most pressing subjects awaiting further attention. For earlier work see a number of the essays in Ellis', Perspectives in American Catholicism (Baltimore, 1963)Google Scholar; Browne, Henry J., The Catholic Church and the Knights of Labor (Washington, 1949)Google Scholar; Karson, Marc, Politics and Labor Unions 1900–1918 (Carbondale, 1958)Google Scholar and Taft, Philip, The A.F. of L. in the Time of Gompers (New York, 1959), 334–341.Google Scholar

44. Quoted by Moynahan, op. cit., 50; Dohen, Dorothy J., Nationalism and American Catholicism (New York, 1967)Google Scholar. Bishop John Wright earlier expressed his concern over the Catholic's perhaps too uncritical Americanism and nationalism. See for example his introduction to Putz, op. cit., pp. xi-vviii.

45. Broom, Leonard and Senznick, Philip, Sociology, 3rd ed. (New York, 1963), 409.Google Scholar

46. Hofstadter, Richard, Anti-Intellectualism in America, 136.Google Scholar

47. The instrumental character of American religion was noted by Toqueville and Francis Grund a century before Will Herberg. See Brauer, Jeraid C., “Images of Religion,” Church History, XXX (03 1961), 7Google Scholar. On a recent discussion of “how far the American hierarchy departed from the Conservative traditions of the Church in their eager acceptance of the blessings of liberty” see Guttmann, Allen, “From Brownson to Eliot: The Conservative Theory of Church and State,” American Quarterly, XVII (Fall 1965), 489.Google Scholar

48. de Tocqueville, Aiexis, Democracy in America, Mentor edition (New York, 1955), 30.Google Scholar