Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T12:35:09.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Eschatology of the Eos-Circle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Paul Gottfried
Paul Gottfried
Affiliation:
Mr. Gottfried is assistant professor of history inCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Madame de Staël, in her monumental study of German culture, L'Allemagne, wrote of the Catholic church at the dawn of the nineteenth century: “Today, standing disarmed, it has the majesty of an aged lion which formerly made the universe tremble.”1 The French empire, continuing the policy of the revolution, confiscated ecclesiastical property wherever it expanded. By 1804 Napoleon distributed the church's land in Germany—which had been the most extensive in her possession of any country in Christendom—among his client rulers on the right bank of the Rhine.2 All over Europe princes were dissolving monastic communities in order to make their revenues available to the state. Perhaps the church suffered her crowning indignity in 1809, when Napoleon responded to a dispute with the pope by making him his prisoner.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 187 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. de Staël, Madame, De L'Allemagne (Paris, 1960), V, 67–8.Google Scholar

2. Cf. Huber, E. R., Verfassungsgeschichte (Stuttgart: W. Kohlhanmer, 1961), pp. 40–44.Google Scholar

3. See especially Alexis de Tocqueville, The Old Regime and the Revolution, trans. Gilbert, S. (New York: Doubleday, 1955), pp. 6–8.Google Scholar

4. Ibid., and Goyau, George, L'Allemagne religieuse (Paris, 1905-1910), vol. I.Google Scholar

5. De L'Allemagne, V, 66.Google Scholar

6. Treitschke, Heinrich, Deittsche Gesohichte im XIX Jahrhunderte (Leipzig, 1879), I, 188.Google Scholar

7. Schnabel, Franz, Deutsche Gesochichte im XIX Jahrhunderte (Freiburg: Herber, 1947), IV, 55 and 80.Google Scholar

8. Goethe Briefe, ed. P. Stein (Berlin, 1905), Vii, 72–73.

9. Novalis Schriften, ed. J. Minor (Leipzig, 1907), II, 22–26.

10. De L'Allemagne, V, 69–72.Google Scholar

11. Schnabel, IV, 148 and 151.

12. Schlegel, Friedrich, Kritische Ausgabe, VII, ed. Behler, E. (Zurich, 1966), 495.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., p. 486.

14. Ibid., XIII, ed. Anstett, J. J. (Paderborn, Munich, and Vienna: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1960), 250.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., pp. 252–253.

16. Cf. Sehlegel's, Philosophy of Life (English trans.: London, 1851), p. 162.Google Scholar

17. Philosophy of History (English trans.: London, 1830), p. 308.Google Scholar

18. Kritsche Ausgabe, VII, 483.Google Scholar

19. Eos, No. 92, June 9, 1828.

20. Cf. H. Kapfinger's Eoskreis, Munich, 1928.

21. Cf. Reisse, Roman, Die weltanschauliche Entwicklung des jungen Goerres (Leipzig, 1928).Google Scholar

22. von Mueller, K. A., “Goerres in Strassburg,” in Goerres Festschrift (Munich, 1926).Google Scholar

23. Cf. Beguin, Albert, L'Ame romantique et le Reve (Paris; J. Corti, 1946), vol. I, chapter VIII.Google Scholar

24. Cf. Fuhrman's, H.Schellings Spaetphilosophie (Duesseldorf, 1940), p. 17.Google Scholar

25. Scheuing's, Saemmtliche Werke (Cotta Press, 1856-1861), Section II, IV, 50–254.Google Scholar

26. Ibid., pp. 220–280 passim.

27. Ibid., pp. 332–334.

28. Cf. the issues of Eos for June 1829.

29. Eos, no. 181, Nov. 12, 1828.

30. Ibid., no. 27, Feb. 16, 1831.

31. Cf. Mannheim's, K.Ideology and Utopia, trans. Wirth, L. (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1936), pp. 206–222Google Scholar. I am using the expression “utopianism” in the sense defined by Mannheim: as an “orientation transcending reality… which, when it passes into conduct… shatters the prevailing order.” (Ibid., p. 123).

32. Ibid., p. 218.

33. Ibid., pp. 208–212.

34. Eos, no. 154, Sept. 26, 1828.Google Scholar

35. Eos, no. 51, March 29, 1828.Google Scholar

36. Cf. Concordia (Vienna, 1821), I, 147.Google Scholar

37. See especially the following issues of Eos: no. 88, 06 3, 1829Google Scholar; no. 98, July 20, 1829; and no. 139, Sept. 2, 1831.

38. Cf. Baader's, Saemmtliche Werke (Leipzig, 1856), vol. VI and XV.Google Scholar

39. Goerres Ausgewaehlte Werke und Briefe, ed. W. Schellberg (Kempten, 1911), pp. 474–475.Google Scholar

40. Cf. Review of Politics, 21 (10, 1959), 635–36.Google Scholar

41. Philosophy of Life, pp. 162–63.

42. Eos, no. 92, June 9, 1828.Google Scholar

43. Novalis Schriften, II, 38–45.Google Scholar

44. Ibid., p. 37.

45. Schelling's, Saemmtliche Wedke, section I, Vol VII, 404–406, and 410–413.Google Scholar

46. Schrnidlin, Joseph, Papstgeschichte im XIX Jahrhunderte (Munich: Josef Kösel und Friedrich Pustet, 1933), I, 413.Google Scholar

47. Cf. Ringseis, J. N., Erinnerungen (Regensburg, 1886) III, 58.Google Scholar

48. Quoted in Susini's, EugeneF. von B. et le Romantisme mystique (Paris, 1942), II, 270.Google Scholar

49. Bander's, Baemmtiiche Werke, vol. XII and XIII.Google Scholar

50. Susini, I, 269.

51. Knittenmayr, Hinrich, Schelling und die romantische Schule (Munich: E. Reinhardt, 1929), pp. 32–35, 357–404, and 415–441.Google Scholar

52. Schellings Briefe, ed. G. L. Plitt (Leipzig, 1870), II, 222–227.Google Scholar

53. Cf. Doberl's, M.Entwicklungsgeschichte Bayerns (Munch: Oldenbourg, 1928), II, 462–475.Google Scholar

54. Cf. Ringseis, , Erinnerungen, I, 49–56Google Scholar; and Friedrich, J., Ignaz Doellinger (Munich, 1899), pp. 173–174.Google Scholar

55. For a thorough study of the formation of Boehme's cosmogeny, see Koyre's, AlexanderLa Phliosophic de J. Boehme (Paris, 1929).Google Scholar

56. Cf. Fuhrmans, op. cit., pp. 319–325 and the concluding chapter of Knittenmayr.

57. Quoted in Eduard Lecanuet's biography of Count de Montalembert (Paris, 1903), I, 382.

58. Goerres Ausgewaehlte Werke und Briefe, p. 460.

59. Athenasus (Regensburg, 1838), p. 144.Google Scholar

60. Ibid., p. 145.

61. Sehnabel, IV, 211.

62. Cf. Grisar, Joseph, Bayern und Preussen zur Zeit der Koelner Wirren (unpublished dissertation, Munich, 1923)Google Scholar; and Tonsor, Stephen, “The Historical Morphology of Ernst Lasaulx,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 25 (1964), 378–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar