Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.


    Giangiulio, Maurizio 2012. The Encyclopedia of Ancient History.

    Taylor, Claire 2007. From the Whole Citizen Body?: The Sociology of Election and Lot in the Athenian Democracy. Hesperia, Vol. 76, Issue. 2, p. 323.

    Lalonde, Gerald V 2006. IG I31055 B and the Boundary of Melite and Kollytos. Hesperia, Vol. 75, Issue. 1, p. 83.

    Gaeta, Luca 2004. Athenian democracy and the political foundation of space. Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 5, Issue. 4, p. 471.

    Forsdyke, Sara 2000. Exile, Ostracism and the Athenian Democracy. Classical Antiquity, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 232.

    Cummings, Stephen and Brocklesby, John 1997. Towardsdemokratia‐ myth and the management of organizational change in ancient Athens. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 71.

    Stanton, G. R. 1996. Some Inscriptions in Attic demes. The Annual of the British School at Athens, Vol. 91, p. 341.


Kleisthenes' Reform Bill

  • A. Andrewes (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2009

Modern research has done much to elucidate the question what the reforms of Kleisthenes in fact achieved, and the work continues, but that does not settle the question what he was trying to achieve. Herodotos gives him a political motive in outline, that he brought the people over to his side because he had been defeated in a struggle for power against Isagoras (5.66.2); and in resuming this proposition after a digression he describes the Athenian people as (5.69.2). But he gives us no clear insight into the nature or mechanism of the struggle with Isagoras, and in particular he does not say that the latter's election to the archonship in 508 constituted his victory, though the dating of the reform to the archonship of Isagoras ('A.21.1) makes that highly probable; nor does he explain in what sense or by whom the Athenian people had been ‘previously excluded’.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. S. Young , Hesperia 20 (1951), 140–3, suggested that some boundaries might have followed roads, partly because they are easy to follow; but a road, at least one inhabited on both sides, tends to unify rather than divide, and on the procedure I suggest below it would not matter if the ‘boundary’ ran behind the houses.

T. J. Cadoux , JHS 68 (1948), 114. There is no other evidence of the date of his archonship, which must thus depend on the view taken about the time needed to implement the reform.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Classical Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0009-8388
  • EISSN: 1471-6844
  • URL: /core/journals/classical-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *