No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Mothers of Mid-century Spanish Families: Agents of Social Change in the Context of Dictatorship and Patriarchy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2022
Abstract
This article focuses on how middle-class families created during the second half of the Francoist dictatorship in Spain decisively contributed to improving the educational level of the biggest generation in Spanish society, born between the late 1950s and the mid-1970s. Mothers played a particularly important role in this ‘educational shift’. Even though under Francoism legislation and moral habits implied female subordination in virtually all spheres of life, many of those mothers were willing and able to promote their children's education irrespective of their gender. Making use of oral history, the article offers an account of how mothers of the Spanish baby boom generation entered into marriage, organised their daily lives at home and took decisions regarding their children's welfare and education. Today in their old age, these women deserve to be considered important agents of the remarkable social change Spain has experienced during the last decades.
- Type
- Special Issue Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
1 Galdós, Benito Pérez, Episodios Nacionales. El equipaje del Rey José (Madrid: Alianza, 1999 [1875]), 45Google Scholar (own translation).
2 See, for instance, Radcliff, Pamela Beth, Modern Spain. 1808 to the Present (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2017), 266–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Requena, Miguel, ‘Economic and Social Changes since the Restoration of Democracy’, in Muro, Diego and Lago, Ignacio, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Spanish Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 100–14Google Scholar.
3 Outstanding in the initial formulation of this argument has been Pérez-Díaz, Víctor, The Return of Civil Society. The Emergence of Democratic Spain (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar. In the same vein, Radcliff, Pamela Beth, Making Democratic Citizens in Spain: Civil Society and the Popular Origins of the Transition, 1960–1978 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Focus has been put primarily on factors like (illegal or a-legal) workers’ and students’ unions, neighbourhood and professional associations, religious groupings, etc.; i.e. on formal civil society organisations. Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996), 8Google Scholar, noted that ‘we should not forget another part of society: ordinary citizens who are not a part of any organizations’. However, the authors emphasised the explicit political activity of these citizens in purely individual terms, thus disregarding the importance of socialisation in non-political communities, like families.
5 Reher, David, ‘The History of the Family in Spain: Past Development, Present Realities, and Future Challenges’, The History of the Family. An International Quarterly, 3, 2 (1998), 128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
6 Among others, Pérez-Diaz, Víctor, Chuliá, Elisa and Valiente, Celia, La familia española en el año 2000 (Madrid: Argentaria, 1999)Google Scholar; Landwerlin, Gerardo Meil, Individualización y solidaridad familiar (Barcelona: La Caixa, 2011)Google Scholar; Naldini, Manuela, The Family in the Mediterranean Welfare States (London: Frank Cass, 2003)Google Scholar and Mínguez, Almudena Moreno, ed., Family Well-Being. European Perspectives (New York: Springer, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 After the pioneering work of Gallego, M. Teresa, Mujer, Falange y Franquismo (Madrid: Taurus, 1983)Google Scholar, key texts in this field have been published by Morcillo, Aurora, True Catholic Womanhood. Gender Ideology in Franco's Spain (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2000)Google Scholar, Ángela Cenarro, La sonrisa de Falange. Auxilio Social en la guerra civil y la posguerra (Barcelona: Crítica, 2006) and Ruiz, Rosario, ¿Eternas menores? Las mujeres en el franquismo (Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, 2007)Google Scholar.
8 Among sociologists, see Soler, Constanza Tobío, ‘Conciliación o contradicción. Cómo hacen las madres trabajadoras’, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 97 (2002), 155–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Gay, Isabel Aler, La transformación de la maternidad en la sociedad española 1975–2005. Otra visión sociológica (Sevilla: Fundación Centro de Estudios Andaluces, 2006)Google Scholar. Among communication researchers, see Fuentes, María José Gámez, Cinematergrafía: la madre en el cine y la literatura de la democracia (Castellón: Universitat Jaume I, 2004)Google Scholar and Medina, Pilar, Figueras, Mònica and Gómez, Lorena, ‘El ideal de madre en el siglo XXI. La representación de la maternidad en las revistas de familia’, Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 20, 1 (2014), 487–504Google Scholar.
9 Eider de Dios-Fernández and Raúl Mínguez-Blasco, ‘Catholic Housewives in Transition: The Centres for the Promotion of Women between the Franco Dictatorship and Democracy in Spain (1960–1980)’, Journal of Religious History, 45, 4 (2021) and Morcillo, Aurora G., (In)visible Acts of Resistance in the Twilight of the Franco Regime. A Historical Narration (Bielefeld: Transcript, 2022)Google Scholar.
10 Redondo, Rosa Gómez, ‘El descenso de la mortalidad infantil en Madrid, 1900–1970’, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 32 (1985), 101–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 On the relationship between declining child mortality and falling fertility see MacInnes, John and Díaz, Julio Pérez, ‘The Reproductive Revolution’, The Sociological Review, 57, 2 (2009), 262–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Total fertility rates consistently fell from 1905 (4.69) to 1955 (2.53).
12 After five decades of unwavering decline, the total fertility rate increased between 1955 (2.53) and 1975 (2.85). It then swiftly began to drop. By 2000 it had plunged to 1.19.
13 Leandro Prados de la Escosura, Spanish Economic Growth, 1850–2015 (London: Palgrave, 2017), 20.
14 Bavel, Jan Van and Reher, David, ‘The Baby Boom and Its Causes: What We Know and What We Need to Know’, Population and Development Review, 39, 2 (2013), 257–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 Foessa, Fundación, Informe sociológico sobre la situación social de España 1970 (Madrid, 1972), 157, 326Google Scholar.
16 Morcillo, Aurora G., Seduction of Modern Spain: The Female Body and the Francoist Body Politic (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 2010), 136Google Scholar.
17 Mónica García-Fernández, ‘From National Catholicism to Romantic Love: The Politics of Love and Divorce in Franco's Spain’, Contemporary European History, 31 (2022), 2–14.
18 Huguet, Montserrat, La España del seiscientos. Memoria de la generación de los sesenta (Madrid: La Catarata, 2019), 17Google Scholar.
19 In 1950, 79 per cent of women aged 21 to 25 were single; in 1970 the percentage had fallen to 58, and in 1975 it was six points lower (52 per cent). Benito Cachinero Sánchez, ‘La evolución de la nupcialidad en España’, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 20 (1982), 87.
20 Morcillo, Seduction, 136.
21 Shubert, Adrian, A Social History of Modern Spain (London: Routledge, 1996), 213–14Google Scholar. Though abortion had been legalised by the government of the Second Republic in 1937, Franco abolished this legislation as he took power. The 1941 Penal Code introduced harsh repressive measures for all persons involved in abortion practices. Until 1978, three years after Franco's death, oral contraception was only allowed as a therapeutic gynecological drug. Ortiz-Gomez, Teresa and Ignaciuk, Agata, ‘“Pregnancy and Labour Cause more Deaths than Oral Contraceptives”: The Debate on the Pill in the Spanish Press in the 1960s and 1970s’, Public Understanding of Science, 24, 6 (2015), 658–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
22 Morcillo, Seduction, 159.
23 Sánchez-Domínguez, María and Lundgren, Anna Sofia, ‘The Marriage Boom: Spanish and Swedish Women Making Sense of Marriage During the Marriage Boom’, The History of the Family, 20, 1 (2015), 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 As defined by Morcillo, Seduction, 138, who claims that women's bodies and families were nationalised under Francoism in line with ideological and demographic goals.
25 During the baby boom natural population growth (difference between births and deaths) in Spain exceeded yearly 360,000 persons, unprecedented figures before 1958 which have never been reached after 1977. Anna Cabré, Domingo, Andreu and Menacho, Teresa, ‘Demografía y crecimiento de la población española durante el siglo XX’, Mediterráneo Económico, 1 (2012), 123Google Scholar.
26 Shubert, Social History, 214.
27 Sponsler, Lucy A., ‘The Status of Married Women under the Legal System of Spain’, Louisiana Law Review, 42, 5 (1982), 1599Google Scholar.
28 Franco, Rosario Ruiz, ‘Nuevas leyes para nuevos tiempos: la situación jurídica y social de las mujeres en España del tardofranquismo a la transición a la democracia’, Spagna contemporanea, 55 (2019), 38Google Scholar.
29 Ginsborg, Paul, Family Politics. Domestic Life, Devastation and Survival 1900–1950 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014), 228–311Google Scholar.
30 Only marital separation was allowed, but under limited conditions (among them, adultery, abandonment of home, maltreatment or violence).
31 General Franco suppressed all political parties that existed during the Second Republic, except for two (the Fascist-style Spanish Falange and the Traditionalist Communion) which were merged in 1937 in Falange Española Tradicionalista y de las Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional-Sindicalistas (known as the Falange). This was the only legal party in Spain until 1977.
32 Zira Box, ‘Metáforas de linealidad, género y fascismo español. Una propuesta de análisis socio-metafórico’, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 164 (2018), 41–56; Ángela Cenarro, ‘La Falange es un modo de ser (mujer): discursos e identidades de género en las publicaciones de la Sección Femenina (1938–1945)’, Historia y Política, 37 (2017), 91–120.
33 Meriwynn Grothe, ‘“Franco's Angels”: Recycling the Ideology of Domesticity’, Revista de Estudios Hispánicos 33, 3 (1999), 513–37.
34 Sergio Espuelas, ‘Political Regime and Public Social Spending in Spain: A Time Series Analysis (1850–2000)’, Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, 35, 3 (2017), 355–86.
35 These quotes are taken from the preamble of the Law of 24 Apr. 1958 which modifies some articles of the Civil Code (Ley de 24 de abril de 1958 por la que se modifican determinados artículos del Código Civil, B.O.E. 25–04–1958).
36 On the development and mobilsation of progressive Catholic female associations since the 1960s, see Celia Valiente, ‘Social Movements in Abeyance in Non-Democracies: The Women's Movement in Franco's Spain’, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change [online], (2015), 270–9, and Moreno, Mónica, ‘Mujeres en la Acción Católica y el Opus Dei. Identidades de género y culturas políticas en los años sesenta’, Historia y Política, 28 (2012), 167–94Google Scholar. Ruiz Franco, ‘“Nuevas leyes”, explains how female lawyers’ associations managed to influence changes in civil law decision making. The contribution of women's organisations to civil society and democratic citizenship has been analysed by Radcliff, Pamela, ‘Citizens and Housewives: The Problem of Female Citizenship in Spain's Transition to Democracy’, Journal of Social History, 36, 1 (2002), 77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
37 García-Fernández, ‘From National Catholicism’, 8–12.
38 See also Mary Nash, ‘Turismo, género y neocolonialismo’, Historia Social, 96 (2020), 41–62. It has been estimated that during the 1960s and early 1970s more than 100,000 workers per year emigrated to France, Germany and Switzerland: Olympia Bover and Pilar Velilla, ‘Migrations in Spain: Historical Background and Current Trends’, Banco de España (Documentos de Trabajo), 9909 (1999).
39 Sarasúa, Carmen, ‘Aprendiendo a ser mujeres: las escuelas de niñas en la España del siglo XIX’, Cuadernos de Historia Contemporánea, 24 (2002), 297Google Scholar.
40 Thus, a decree published in 1910 forbade the establishment of specifically female requirements for the access to secondary and tertiary education. See Canales, Antonio F., ‘Little Intellectuals. Girls’ Academic Secondary Education Under Francoism: Projects, Realities and Paradoxes’, Gender and Education, 24, 4 (2012), 377CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
41 Canales, ‘Little Intellectuals’, 386.
42 Domingo, Pilar Ballarín, ‘Género y políticas educativas’, Revista de Educación, 6 (2004), 35–42Google Scholar. A similar critical argument regarding the 1970 bill, in García, Consuelo Flecha, ‘Desequilibrios de género en educación en la España contemporánea: causas, indicadores y consecuencias’, Áreas. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, 33 (2014)Google Scholar.
43 M. Antonia García de León and Marisa García de Cortázar, ‘Universidades y universitarios (1970–1990), Revista de Educación, n° extr. (1992), 89–108.
44 Foessa, Informe, 1972, 283.
45 Where there was more than one daughter, the author has selected only one after taking into consideration the birth order of siblings so as to include different positions.
46 Abrams, Lynn, ‘Heroes of Their Own Life Stories: Narrating the Female Self in the Feminist Age’, Cultural and Social History, 16, 2 (2019), 205–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
47 All the interviews are in the possession of the author.
48 Garrido, Luis and Chuliá, Elisa, Ocupación, formación y el futuro de la jubilación en España (Madrid: CES, 2005), 46Google Scholar (table 2.1). The corresponding proportions for males are roughly one fifth (for those born between 1931 and 1945) and a half (for those born between 1961 and 1975). On the consequences of this ‘educational shift’ for current Spanish families and the structural position of today's adult women in Spanish society see Elisa Chuliá, ‘State, Society and Family Change in 20th Century Spain: The Evolution of the “Strong Family Model”’, in Jürgen Nautz, Paul Ginsborg and Ton Nijhuis, eds., The Golden Chain. Family, Civil Society and the State (Oxford: Berghahn, 2013), 120–43.
49 In 1970–71 the total number of university students (352,000) was well below the average number of yearly newborns during the baby boom period (c. 650,000). Ten years later the number of university students had increased to 698,000.
50 Abrams, ‘Heroes’, 220–1.
51 See, for instance, Valiente, ‘Social Movements’, Moreno, ‘Mujeres’, Ruiz Franco, ‘Nuevas leyes’ and García-Fernández, ‘From National Catholicism’.
52 For example, Pérez-Díaz, The Return, and Radcliff, Making Democratic Citizens.
53 See, for instance, Almudena Moreno Mínguez, ‘Understanding the Impact of Economic Crisis on Inequality, Household Structure, and Family Support in Spain from a Comparative Perspective’, Journal of Poverty, 21, 5 (2017), 454–81, and Ayuso, Luis, Requena, Félix, Jiménez-Rodríguez, Olga and Khamis, Nadia, ‘The Effects of COVID-19 Confinement on the Spanish Family: Adaptation or Change?’, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 51, 3–4 (2020), 274–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.