No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Influence of Francis W. Parker on Doris Humphrey's Teaching Methodology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2014
Extract
Modern dance pioneer Doris Humphrey (1895–1958) is remembered today primarily for her dances and her theory of choreography, but her contributions to the dance extend far beyond the development of repertory and composition. She was a beautiful and accomplished performer, velvety and strong. She was a gifted educator, who influenced recreational students as well as professional dancers and teachers. She was also a brilliant technical innovator who, using the natural movements of the human body as the basis of her technique, developed a unique language of movement with which to communicate her experiences as an artist living in twentieth-century America.
Based on principles of movement, Humphrey's technique is less idiosyncratic than the technique of other modern dancers. Systematic in its practice, if not in its curriculum, the technique was never codified into a syllabus of repeatable exercises. The way in which it was taught by Humphrey and others is distinctive, and is as important an aspect of the technique as the movement principles upon which it was founded. Humphrey's teaching methodology grew from a progressive philosophical perspective towards education to which she had been exposed during her years as a student at the Francis W. Parker School. This paper will examine the Parker approach and trace its influence on Humphrey's emerging technique and teaching methodology.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1996
References
SELECTED BIBILIOGRAPHY
Campbell, Jack K. 1967. Colonel Francis W. Parker: The Children's Crusader. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Selma Jeanne. 1972. Doris Humphrey: An Artist First. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1929. Characters and Events. Edited by Ratner, Joseph. 2 vols. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Doris (1895–1958): A Major Artist of the Modern Dance Leaves a Living Heritage. Dance Magazine (Feb. 1959): 34.Google Scholar
Doris Humphrey Collection, 1811–1958 (Folder Z8), Dance Collection, New York Public Library for the Performing Arts, New York City, New York.Google Scholar
Frampton, Eleanor. 1960. Doris Humphrey the Educator. Journal of Health, Physical Education, Recreation 31/2: 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinman, Mary Wood. 1934. Educational Possibilities of the Dance. Journal of Health and Physical Education 5/4: 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinman, Mary Wood. 1924. Gymnastic and Folk Dances. 5 vols. New York: A. S. Barnes and Company.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Doris. 1956. Lecture. Audiotape of lecture presented by Doris Humphrey at the Juilliard School of Music New York City for the National Educational Television Program, Pioneers of Modern Dance, 7 Nov.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Doris. 1941. My Approach to the Modern Dance. Dance: A Basic Educational Technique. Edited by Rogers, Frederick Rand. New York: MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Doris. 1953. Repertory: Second of Two Articles on Teaching Values. New York Times (2 Aug.): 7X.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Doris. 1953. Repertory: Teaching Standard Works to the Artist-Pupil. New York Times (26 July): 7XGoogle Scholar
Martin, John. 1929. Achievement: The Unique Success of Doris Humphrey in Ensemble Building—New Programs. New York Times (7 Apr.): 8X.Google Scholar
Martin, John. 1934. Distortions: Doris Humphrey Introduces Delicate Topic Among Dance Educators. New York Times (9 Dec): 8X.Google Scholar
Martin, John. 1959. Epic Figure: Doris Humphrey Helped Shape an Art from First Impulses to Maturity. New York Times (11 Jan.): 12X.Google Scholar
Martin, John. 1965. The Modern Dance. Princeton, New Jersey: Dance Horizons/Princeton Book Company.Google Scholar
The Modern Dance: Humphrey Technique. Film. 1936. New York: Pictorial Films.Google Scholar
Odom, Selma Landen. 1987. Sharing the Dances of Many People: The Teaching Work of Mary Wood Hinman. Proceedings of the Society of Dance History Scholars. University of California, Irvine, Cal.Google Scholar
Palmer, Stuart. 1931. Doris Humphrey: Mistress of the Group. Dance Magazine (June): 60.Google Scholar
Palmer, Stuart. 1932. The Month in New York. The Dancing Times, new series, 259: 17–18.Google Scholar
Ratner, Joseph, ed. 1939. Intelligence in the Modern World: John Dewey's Philosophy. New York: Random House, Inc.Google Scholar
Raye, Zelia, and Davis, Joan. 1931. The Art of Doris Humphrey: An Appreciation. The Dancing Times, new series, 254: 143–45.Google Scholar
Rogers, Frederick Rand, ed. 1980. Dance: A Basic Educational Technique. New York: Dance Horizons.Google Scholar
Schurman, Nona, and Clark, Sharon Leigh. 1972. Modern Dance Fundamentals. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Spiesman, Mildred. 1950. The Traditional School of the 1890's and the Entry of Colonel Francis W. Parker. Dance Magazine (Nov. 22).Google Scholar
Stodelle, Ernestine. 1978. The Dance Technique of Doris Humphrey and its Creative Potential. Princeton: Princeton Book Company, Publishers.Google Scholar
Weidman, Charles. 1966–1967. Interview by Marian Horosko. Tape recording. 20 reels. Recorded 6, 7, 20 Dec. 1966; 31 Jan.; 28 Feb.; 7 Mar.; 7, 8, 9, Aug. 1967. Expression of Two Arts Theatre, New York City. Dance Collection, New York Public Library for the Performing Arts, New York City, New York.Google Scholar