Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Against a Sequestered Philosophy

  • EYJA M. BRYNJARSDÓTTIR (a1)
Abstract

This paper argues that philosophical practice in the Western world, in particular analytic philosophy, suffers from problems that contribute to its lack of diversity in two senses: the exclusion of women and minorities, and a narrow choice of subjects and methods. This is not fruitful for philosophical exchange and the flourishing of philosophical thought. Three contributing factors are covered: a flawed execution when instilling intellectual humility; the gaslighting of women in philosophy; and an overemphasis on a narrow conception of intelligence. The conclusion calls for a more humane and socially aware practice of philosophy.

Cet article soutient que la pratique philosophique dans le monde occidental, en particulier la philosophie analytique, souffre de problèmes qui contribuent à son manque de diversité, et ce, dans deux sens : l’exclusion des femmes et des minorités, et un choix étroit de sujets et de méthodes. Ceci n’est fructueux ni pour l’échange philosophique ni pour l’épanouissement de la pensée philosophique. Trois facteurs y contribuant sont l’objet de la discussion : une pratique défectueuse au moment d’inculquer l’humilité intellectuelle, le «gaslighting» pratiqué à l’endroit des femmes en philosophie et une trop grande importance accordée à une conception étroite de l’intelligence. La conclusion en appelle à une pratique plus humaine et socialement consciente de la philosophie.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*<eyjabryn@hi.is>
References
Hide All
Abramson, Kate 2014 “Turning up the Lights on Gaslighting.” Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1): 130.
Alcoff, Linda Martín (Ed.) 2003 Singing in the Fire: Stories of Women in Philosophy, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
APA Member Demographics 2014–2016 Demographic Statistics on the APA Membership, FY2014 to FY2016. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.apaonline.org/resource/resmgr/data_on_profession/Member_Demo_Chart_FY2016_rev.pdf. Accessed 25 September 2017.
Barnes, Elizabeth 2014 “Going Beyond the Fundamental: Feminism in Contemporary Metaphysics.” Proceedings of Aristotelian Society 114 (3): 335351.
Battersby, Christine 1989 Gender and Genius: Towards a Feminist Aesthetics, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Behrensen, Maren, and Kaliarnta, Sofia 2017 “Sick and Tired: Depression in the Margins of Academic Philosophy.” Topoi 36: 355364.
Benson, Paul 1994 “Free Agency and Self-Worth.” Journal of Philosophy 91 (12): 650–68.
Cherry, Myisha, and Schwitzgebel, Eric 2016 “Like the Oscars #PhilosophySoWhite.” Los Angeles Times 4 March 2016, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0306-schwitzgebel-cherry-philosophy-so-white-20160306-story.html. Accessed 30 May 2017.
Cudd, Ann 2006 Analyzing Oppression, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cukor, George 1944 Gaslight. Film.
Dickinson, Thorold 1940 Gaslight. Film.
Dotson, Kristie 2012 “How Is This Paper Philosophy?” Comparative Philosophy 3 (1): 329.
Dotson, Kristie 2014 “Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression.” Social Epistemology 28 (2): 115138.
Duca, Lauren 2016 “Donald Trump is Gaslighting America.” Teen Vogue 10 December 2016, https://www.teenvogue.com/story/donald-trump-is-gaslighting-america. Accessed 25 September 2017.
Fehr, Carla 2011 “What is in it for me? The benefits of diversity in scientific communities.” In Grasswick, Heidi (Ed.), Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.
Feynman, Richard P. 1985 “Surely You’re joking, Mr. Feynman!”: (Adventures of a Curious Character), Feynman, Richard P. as told to Leighton, Ralph; edited by Hutchings, Edward, New York: Norton.
Fricker, Miranda 2007 Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frye, Marilyn 1983 “Oppression.” In The Politics of Reality (pp. 116). Freedom, California: Crossing Press.
Goguen, Stacey 2016 “Stereotype Threat, Epistemic Injustice, and Rationality.” In Brownstein, Michael and Saul, Jennifer (Eds.), Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology (pp. 216237). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamilton, Patrick 1938 Gas Light. Stage play.
Hutchison, Katrina 2013 “Sages and Cranks. The Difficulty of Identifying First-Rate Philosophers.” In Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona (Eds.), Women in Philosophy. What Needs to Change? (pp. 103126). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jenkins, Katharine 2014 “That’s not philosophy: feminism, academia and the double bind.” Journal of Gender Studies 23 (3): 262274.
Kidd, Ian James, Medina, José, and Pohlhaus, Gaile 2017 The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, London/New York: Routledge.
Kitcher, Philip 2011 “Philosophy Inside Out.” Metaphilosophy 42 (3): 248260.
Leslie, Sarah-Jane, Cimpian, Andrei, Meyer, Meredith, and Freeland, Edward 2015 “Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines.” Science 347 (6219): 262265.
Meijers, Anthonie 2013 “Gender and Philosophy in the Netherlands.” New APPS Blog: http://www.newappsblog.com/2013/12/gender-and-philosophy-in-the-netherlands-guest-post.html. Accessed 27 September 2017.
Park, Eugene 2014 “Why I Left Academia: Philosophy’s Homogeneity Needs Rethinking.” Hippo Reads, Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hippo-reads/why-i-left-academia_b_5735320.html. Accessed 27 September 2017.
Pohlhaus, Gaile 2016 “Propaganda, Inequality, and Epistemic Movement.” Theoria 31 (3): 345356.
Rammstedt, Beatrice, and Rammsayer, Thomas H. 2000 “Sex differences in self-estimates of different aspects of intelligence.” Personality and Individual Differences 29 (5): 869880.
Roberts, Robert C., and Jay Wood, W. 2003 “Humility and Epistemic Goods.” In DePaul, Michael and Zagzebski, Linda (Eds.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ruíz, Elena Flores 2014 “Musing: Spectral Phenomenologies: Dwelling Poetically in Professional Philosophy.” Hypatia 29 (1): 196204.
Ryan, Sharon M. 2012 “Wisdom, Knowledge, and Rationality.” Acta Analytica 27 (2): 99112.
Salamon, Gayle 2009 “Justification and Queer Method, or Leaving Philosophy.” Hypatia 24 (1): 225230.
Saul, Jennifer 2013 “Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy.” In Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona (Eds.), Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change? (pp. 3960). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scheman, Naomi 1995 “Symposium: Feminist Epistemology: Feminist Epistemology.” Metaphilosophy 26 (3): 177190.
Schwitzgebel, Eric 2010 “On Being Good at Seeming Smart.” Schwitzsplinters: http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com/2010/03/on-being-good-at-seeming-smart.html. Accessed 30 May 2017.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty 1988 Can the Subaltern Speak? Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Syzmanowicz, Agata, and Furnham, Adrian 2011 “Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: Four meta analyses.” Learning and Individual Differences 21 (5): 493504.
Tschaepe, Mark 2016 “Addressing Microaggressions and Epistemic Injustice: Flourishing from the Work of Audre Lorde.” Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 24 (1): 87101.
Whitcomb, Dennis, Battaly, Heather, Baehr, Jason, and Howard-Snyder, Daniel 2015 “Intellectual Humility: Owning Our Limitations.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (3): 509539.
Women in Philosophy in the UK 2011 Report prepared by SWIP-UK and the British Philosophical Association Committee for Women in Philosophy http://www.swipuk.org/notices/2011-09-08/Women%20in%20Philosophy%20in%20the%20UK%20(BPA-SWIPUK%20Report).pdf. Accessed 27 September 2017.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 188
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 152 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th April 2018 - 19th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.